Second Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing (CTOPP II): Pilot Trial

NCT ID: NCT00182416

Last Updated: 2007-10-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-05-31

Study Completion Date

2006-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pacemaker therapy has been recognized as effective for the control of sinus and atrio-ventricular (AV) node dysfunction. Single chamber pacing when compared with dual chamber pacing, has numerous advantages of low complication rates, lower cost, better longevity, with non-inferiority in the quality of life and hard outcomes proven in direct randomized comparisons. However, comparison between single and dual chamber pacers was never adequate, since not more then half of the patients in the trials were actually using pacemakers for the majority of the time. Routine dual chamber pacing using a right ventricle apical lead is also associated with significant increase in peri-operative and remote complications. Some of these complications may be related to ventricular desynchronization secondary to the pacing location, which is potentially avoidable by using biventricular pacing. A randomized trial which will compare single chamber rate responsive pacing to the best available modification of dual chamber pacing (biventricular pacing) in suitable patients is therefore warranted.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pacemaker Dependence

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

pacemakers atrial fibrillation stroke cardiovascular death

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

pacemaker

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient has symptomatic bradycardia and is a candidate for first pacemaker implantation
* Patient has high risk of being pacemaker dependent by (at least one of the following):

1. Average heart rate of 60 or less on pre-implant Holter
2. Maximal heart rate of 60 in patient on telemetry monitoring 12 hrs preoperatively, when not under medications decreasing heart rate, or under chronic medical treatment inducing bradycardia, which is unlikely to be changed
3. First degree AV block with PR intervals \> 300 ms, or second degree AV block at heart rates \<= 80 bpm.
4. Dependence for 12 hrs when on temporary pacemaker set at 50 bpm if bradycardia is not secondary to medication, or under chronic medical treatment inducing bradycardia, which is unlikely to be changed.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<= 65 years
* Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
* Indication for ICD
* Non-cardiovascular death is likely to occur within 3 years
* Geographical, social, or psychiatric reasons making follow-up problematic
Minimum Eligible Age

66 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eugene Crystal, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre

Robin S Roberts

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

McMaster Univeristy, Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics

Stuart Connolly, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hamilton Health Sciences - General Division

Paul Dorian, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Unity Health Toronto

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hamilton Health Sciences - General Division

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kingston General Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St. Mary's General Hospital

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

University of Ottawa Heart Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CTMG-2005-CTOPPII

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id