Trial Outcomes & Findings for Phase IV Study, Betaseron Versus Copaxone for Relapsing Remitting or CIS Forms of MS Using Triple Dose Gad 3 T MRI (NCT NCT00176592)
NCT ID: NCT00176592
Last Updated: 2021-11-16
Results Overview
Results are per patient mean number of lesions per scan. Results are per patient mean number of lesions per elapsed month. Contrasts types are: IFN 1b interferon beta 1b and GA glatiramer acetate.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
75 participants
up to 2 years
2021-11-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Betaseron
Betaseron 250 micrograms SQ every other day
Betaseron: Betaseron 250 micrograms injected SQ every other day
|
Copaxone
20 mg daily SQ
Copaxone: Copaxone 20 mg injected SQ every day (glatiramer acetate)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
36
|
39
|
|
Overall Study
Followed for 1 Year
|
35
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
Followed for 2 Years
|
29
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
36
|
39
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Phase IV Study, Betaseron Versus Copaxone for Relapsing Remitting or CIS Forms of MS Using Triple Dose Gad 3 T MRI
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Betaseron
n=36 Participants
Betaseron 250 micrograms SQ every other day
Betaseron: Betaseron 250 micrograms injected SQ every other day
|
Copaxone
n=39 Participants
20 mg daily SQ
Copaxone: Copaxone 20 mg injected SQ every day (glatiramer acetate)
|
Total
n=75 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
36 Years
n=5 Participants
|
36 Years
n=7 Participants
|
36 Years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
36 participants
n=5 Participants
|
39 participants
n=7 Participants
|
75 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 2 yearsPopulation: Randomization was stratified by the presence or absence of enhancement. Analysis was intention to treat.
Results are per patient mean number of lesions per scan. Results are per patient mean number of lesions per elapsed month. Contrasts types are: IFN 1b interferon beta 1b and GA glatiramer acetate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Betaseron
n=1688 Combined Active Lesions
Betaseron 250 micrograms SQ every other day
Betaseron: Betaseron 250 micrograms injected SQ every other day
|
Copaxone
n=1053 Combined Active Lesions
20 mg daily SQ
Copaxone: Copaxone 20 mg injected SQ every day (glatiramer acetate)
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Primary Outcome Measure is the Number of "Combined Active Lesions" (CAL) by Monthly MRI at the Conclusion of the Study.
|
0.63 Average number of lesions per scan
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
0.58 Average number of lesions per scan
Standard Deviation 2.46
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 2 yearsThe first part of the secondary outcome measure is the total number of enhancing lesions per patient per treatment arm. The second part of the secondary outcome is the total number of new enhancing lesions per patient per treatment arm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Betaseron
n=1531 Enhancing Lesion
Betaseron 250 micrograms SQ every other day
Betaseron: Betaseron 250 micrograms injected SQ every other day
|
Copaxone
n=973 Enhancing Lesion
20 mg daily SQ
Copaxone: Copaxone 20 mg injected SQ every day (glatiramer acetate)
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Number of Enhancing Lesions.
|
878 New Enhancing Lesion
|
626 New Enhancing Lesion
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearThe 1 year MRI results were used to determine the quantity of disease free patients per contrast type.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Betaseron
n=36 Participants
Betaseron 250 micrograms SQ every other day
Betaseron: Betaseron 250 micrograms injected SQ every other day
|
Copaxone
n=39 Participants
20 mg daily SQ
Copaxone: Copaxone 20 mg injected SQ every day (glatiramer acetate)
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Number of MRI Disease Free Patients.
The number of relapse-free patients at the completion of the study.
|
19 participants
|
28 participants
|
|
The Number of MRI Disease Free Patients.
Free of combined active lesions, namely the combination of enhancing lesions plus new T2 lesions.
|
7 participants
|
10 participants
|
Adverse Events
Betaseron
Copaxone
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Betaseron
n=36 participants at risk
Betaseron 250 micrograms SQ every other day
Betaseron: Betaseron 250 micrograms injected SQ every other day
|
Copaxone
n=39 participants at risk
20 mg daily SQ
Copaxone: Copaxone 20 mg injected SQ every day (glatiramer acetate)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Pregnancy
|
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Malignant Nodule in Lung
|
0.00%
0/36 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroenteritis
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
0.00%
0/39 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Loss of Hearing
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
0.00%
0/39 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pain near IV Site
|
0.00%
0/36 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Myelitis
|
0.00%
0/36 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Venous Thromboembolism
|
0.00%
0/36 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Balance Impairment
|
0.00%
0/36 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aneurysm
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
0.00%
0/39 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Pancreatitis
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
0.00%
0/39 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/36 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
2.6%
1/39 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
0.00%
0/39 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Betaseron
n=36 participants at risk
Betaseron 250 micrograms SQ every other day
Betaseron: Betaseron 250 micrograms injected SQ every other day
|
Copaxone
n=39 participants at risk
20 mg daily SQ
Copaxone: Copaxone 20 mg injected SQ every day (glatiramer acetate)
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Pain/Burning at Injection Site
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
5.1%
2/39 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
|
General disorders
Headache/Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/36 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
5.1%
2/39 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
7.7%
3/39 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events in the form of symptoms were gathered over the duration of the study (24 months).
Adverse events were recorded spontaneously and upon questioning by nurse at MRI for the hour of the MRI. Additional events were recorded at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Additional lab results were studied at follow up visit within three months of MRI. Finally, lab results and clinical adverse events were studied at three interim analyses by data monitoring committee.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place