Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy Study of Galantamine for Cognitive Impairments in Schizophrenia (NCT NCT00176423)
NCT ID: NCT00176423
Last Updated: 2020-12-16
Results Overview
Participants were administered an eight-test neuropsychological test battery at baseline and end-of-study. The battery included the following tests: working memory: WAIS-III Letter-Number Sequencing and Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia Number Sequencing; verbal memory: California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT); visual memory: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (BVMT); motor speed: Grooved Pegboard; processing speed: WAIS-III Digit Symbol and WAIS-III Symbol Search; and the Gordon Diagnostic System CPT. Alternate forms of the CVLT and BVMT were used for the two test occasions. For each neuropsychological test, participant scores were converted to z-scores: z = (score - baseline mean)/baseline SD. For the primary outcome measure, an overall composite z-score was computed from the average of the individual test z-scores. A positive z-score would reflect better performance compared to baseline; a negative z-score would reflect worse performance compared to baseline.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
117 participants
12 weeks
2020-12-16
Participant Flow
The number of people who signed informed consent was "117". Thirty-one participants who signed informed consent did not complete the Evaluation Phase of the study and were not randomized. Eight-six (86) participants completed the Evaluation Phase of the study and were randomized.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Galantamine
galantamine, 24mgs, p.o., qday
|
Placebo
placebo, 3 tablets, p.o., qday
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
42
|
44
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
35
|
38
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy Study of Galantamine for Cognitive Impairments in Schizophrenia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Galantamine
n=42 Participants
galantamine, 24mgs, p.o., qday
galantamine: see arm/group description
|
Placebo
n=44 Participants
placebo, 3 tablets, p.o., qday
galantamine: see arm/group description
|
Total
n=86 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
42 participants
n=5 Participants
|
44 participants
n=7 Participants
|
86 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksParticipants were administered an eight-test neuropsychological test battery at baseline and end-of-study. The battery included the following tests: working memory: WAIS-III Letter-Number Sequencing and Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia Number Sequencing; verbal memory: California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT); visual memory: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (BVMT); motor speed: Grooved Pegboard; processing speed: WAIS-III Digit Symbol and WAIS-III Symbol Search; and the Gordon Diagnostic System CPT. Alternate forms of the CVLT and BVMT were used for the two test occasions. For each neuropsychological test, participant scores were converted to z-scores: z = (score - baseline mean)/baseline SD. For the primary outcome measure, an overall composite z-score was computed from the average of the individual test z-scores. A positive z-score would reflect better performance compared to baseline; a negative z-score would reflect worse performance compared to baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Galantamine
n=35 Participants
galantamine, 24mgs, p.o., qday
galantamine: see arm/group description
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
placebo, 3 tablets, p.o., qday
galantamine: see arm/group description
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Cognitive Improvement Z-score
Week 0
|
0.03 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
-0.03 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
|
Overall Cognitive Improvement Z-score
Week 12
|
0.15 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
0.61 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksThree measures were examined: PR interval, QRS interval, and QTc interval. The three measures were derived from a standard 12-lead ECG recording.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Galantamine
n=42 Participants
galantamine, 24mgs, p.o., qday
galantamine: see arm/group description
|
Placebo
n=44 Participants
placebo, 3 tablets, p.o., qday
galantamine: see arm/group description
|
|---|---|---|
|
ECG Changes From Baseline to 12 Weeks.
PR interval
|
25.7 msec
Standard Deviation 56.0
|
3.0 msec
Standard Deviation 12.0
|
|
ECG Changes From Baseline to 12 Weeks.
QRS interval
|
11.4 msec
Standard Deviation 25.1
|
-1.6 msec
Standard Deviation 11.7
|
|
ECG Changes From Baseline to 12 Weeks.
QTc interval
|
3.03 msec
Standard Deviation 28.89
|
3.03 msec
Standard Deviation 27.68
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeks (Week 12 - Week 0)The SAS total were calculated by adding scores from scales #1-#11. Each scale ranges from "0=None/Normal" to "4=Extreme/Severe". The minimum total score is 0 and the maximum score is 44. Higher scores indicate a more severe extrapyramidal side effect rating.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Galantamine
n=42 Participants
galantamine, 24mgs, p.o., qday
galantamine: see arm/group description
|
Placebo
n=44 Participants
placebo, 3 tablets, p.o., qday
galantamine: see arm/group description
|
|---|---|---|
|
Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score
Week 0
|
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
|
Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score
Week 12
|
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeks (Week 12 - Week 0)Change in AIMS Total Score: Frequencies of Maximum Within-Participant Increases (worsening) from Baseline by Treatment Group. Total score calculated by adding scores from scales #1-#10. Each scale ranges from "0=None" to "4=Severe". The minimum total AIMS score is 0 and the maximum score is 40. Higher scores indicate a more severe abnormal involuntary movement rating.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Galantamine
n=42 Participants
galantamine, 24mgs, p.o., qday
galantamine: see arm/group description
|
Placebo
n=44 Participants
placebo, 3 tablets, p.o., qday
galantamine: see arm/group description
|
|---|---|---|
|
Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)
Week 12
|
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
|
Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)
Week 0
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
Adverse Events
Galantamine
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Galantamine
n=42 participants at risk
galantamine, 24mgs, p.o., qday
galantamine: see arm/group description
|
Placebo
n=44 participants at risk
placebo, 3 tablets, p.o., qday
galantamine: see arm/group description
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
hospitalization due to pneumonia
|
2.4%
1/42
|
0.00%
0/44
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Galantamine
n=42 participants at risk
galantamine, 24mgs, p.o., qday
galantamine: see arm/group description
|
Placebo
n=44 participants at risk
placebo, 3 tablets, p.o., qday
galantamine: see arm/group description
|
|---|---|---|
|
Psychiatric disorders
worsening of psychiatric symptoms
|
2.4%
1/42
|
2.3%
1/44
|
|
Social circumstances
increased alcohol consumption
|
2.4%
1/42
|
0.00%
0/44
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
dizziness
|
0.00%
0/42
|
2.3%
1/44
|
Additional Information
Robert W. Buchanan, M.D.
Maryland Psychiatric Research Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place