Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) With Drug-Eluting Stents (DES) Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) for Patients With Significant Left Main Stenosis

NCT ID: NCT00176397

Last Updated: 2007-09-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Recent technical advances in percutaneous coronary interventions have made it possible to approach patients with coronary lesions formerly considered to be classical candidates for bypass surgery, e.g. patients with left main coronary stenosis. However, it is still unclear whether the good long-term results achieved with the surgical therapy can be reproduced by an interventional strategy using drug-eluting stents (DES).

The aim of the current trial is, therefore, to compare the clinical and angiographic results of PCI and CABG in patients with left main coronary stenosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Recent technical advances in percutaneous coronary interventions have made it possible to approach patients with coronary lesions formerly considered to be classical candidates for bypass surgery, e.g. patients with left main coronary stenosis. However, it is still unclear whether the good long-term results achieved with the surgical therapy can be reproduced by an interventional strategy using drug-eluting stents (DES).

The aim of the current trial is, therefore, to compare the clinical and angiographic results of PCI and CABG in patients with left main coronary stenosis.

The study was planned as a "non-inferiority" trial based on the hypothesis that PCI may be able to reach similar long-term results as compared to CABG.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Stenosis Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (left main)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Significant left main coronary stenosis \>= 50%

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute myocardial infarction (STEMI \< 48h)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Leipzig

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gerhard Schuler, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Leipzig

Friedrich Mohr, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Leipzig

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Leipzig, Heart Center

Leipzig, Saxony, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Enno Boudriot, MD

Role: CONTACT

+49-341-865 ext. 1428

Gerhard Schuler, MD

Role: CONTACT

+49-341-865 ext. 1428

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Enno Boudriot, MD

Role: primary

+49-341-865 ext. 1428

Gerhard Schuler, MD

Role: backup

+49-341-865 ext. 1428

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

118/2003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id