Comparison of Psychometric Properties of Three Depression Measures in Patients With Stroke
NCT ID: NCT00173797
Last Updated: 2005-09-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
300 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2005-08-31
2008-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will be divided into two parts. In the first part, we will spend 3 years in recruiting 200 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of first stroke onset to compare the validity, responsiveness, and acceptability of the HAMD, HADS, and BDI. All patients will be assessed using the three depression scales and other functional measures at 14, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days after stroke.
In the second part, the inter-rater reliability of the three depression scales will be examined in the first year. Sixty chronic stroke patients will be recruited in the study.
Furthermore, the other 60 chronic stroke patients will be recruited in the second year for examining the test-retest reliability and measurement error of the three depression scales.
This study would be the first one to systematically compare the psychometric properties of the three depression scales in a long-term follow up study. The results of the study will be able to help clinicians and researchers select the most suitable depression scales for stroke patients. The results will also provide us references to develop a new depression scale, if needed, for stroke patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
DEFINED_POPULATION
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
0 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan
OTHER_GOV
National Taiwan University Hospital
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ching-Lin Hsieh, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University
Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Ching-Lin Hsieh, PhD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NSC-94-2314-B-002-080
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
9361701232
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id