The Diagnostic Efficacy of Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) in Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM)- A Prospective Study

NCT ID: NCT00173303

Last Updated: 2005-09-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

3000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-31

Study Completion Date

2008-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evalute whether CAD (computer-aided detection) in FFDM (full-field digital mammography) can facilitate the detection rate of breast cancer on mammography compared with FFDM without CAD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Mammography is currently the only documented effective imaging tool for breast cancer screening. However, the sensitivity of mammography may be reduced in dense breasts, and sometimes it is difficult to even perceive a very subtle cancer which presents as a small stellate lesion, or very faint microcalcifications, missed diagnosed thus occurs. Herein, some researchers in Western countries developed computer-aided detection (CAD) system to help radiologists detect subtle, easily overlooked findings to facilitate early breast cancer detection, and most of the research regarding CAD was used in screen-film mammography (SFM) system. Ikeda, et al, worked on the retrospective CAD usage of those negative mammograms which later developed breast cancers. CAD could correctly mark 40% of the areas on these mammograms reported negative previously that later developed evident cancers. However, 80% of these are only nonspecific findings, and do not warrant recall for additional workup even at retrospective unblinded review by well-trained mammographers. The other research concluded that CAD could improve early cancer detection rate of mammography, with the sensitivity of 92% in detection of breast cancer size smaller than 5mm, 94% for cancer size 11-15mm. CAD can detect more microcalcifications than masses (sensitivity for microcalcifications 98%, masses 84%, mass with microcalcifications 92%). CAD could mark an average of 1.3 false positive marks per mammographic exam.

Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) is a new approved technology for breast cancer detection after SFM era since 2000. The diagnostic accuracy of FFDM versus SFM is still under clinical trials, and it is believed the sensitivity and accuracy of FFDM for screening population is relatively equivalent to SFM. However, there are very few reports regarding the CAD application in FFDM, since FFDM can offer the post-acquisition processing on high-resolution review workstation for interpretation. Nevertheless, the spatial resolution of soft-copy reading on monitors for FFDM is slightly inferior to but the contrast resolution is slightly superior to that of conventional SFM. Herein, the diagnostic efficacy and role of CAD in FFDM are still unclear. Therefore, the goal of our study is to explore the sensitivity, false-negative (FN) and false-positive (FP) rates of combination usage of CAD in FFDM system, in comparison with the sensitivity, FN and FP rates of interpretation based on FFDM without CAD combination. We are also about to evaluate the efficacy, additional time spent in adjunct application CAD in FFDM interpretation, in order to assess the feasibility of CAD in FFDM.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Breast neoplasms Breast radiography Cancer screening

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

DEFINED_POPULATION

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* women for mammographic screening
* women with breast disease

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnant women
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tiffany TF Shih, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

National Taiwan University Hospital

Jane Wang, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Taiwan University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jane Wang, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 886-2-23123456

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jane Wang, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Brem RF, Hoffmeister JW, Zisman G, DeSimio MP, Rogers SK. A computer-aided detection system for the evaluation of breast cancer by mammographic appearance and lesion size. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Mar;184(3):893-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.3.01840893.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15728614 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

9461700528

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id