Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease With Adacolumn (NCT NCT00162942)
NCT ID: NCT00162942
Last Updated: 2009-04-07
Results Overview
Clinical Remission is defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of ≤150 when evaluated at Week 12
COMPLETED
PHASE3
235 participants
Baseline to Week 12
2009-04-07
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Adacolumn
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
157
|
78
|
|
Overall Study
Week 12
|
127
|
61
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
51
|
26
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
106
|
52
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Adacolumn
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
10
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Enter Open-Label Study
|
76
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
Alternate Therapy
|
6
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Flare During Active Treatment
|
7
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
2 or more consecutive treatments missed
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease With Adacolumn
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=157 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=78 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Total
n=235 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
40.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 • n=5 Participants
|
41.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=7 Participants
|
40.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
81 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
76 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
110 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
142 participants
n=5 Participants
|
75 participants
n=7 Participants
|
217 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Pacific Islander
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Alcohol Use
Consumes Alcohol
|
85 participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 participants
n=7 Participants
|
139 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Alcohol Use
Previously Drank
|
33 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
45 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Alcohol Use
Never Drank
|
39 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
51 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking Status
Current Smoker
|
46 participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 participants
n=7 Participants
|
72 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking Status
Ex-Smoker
|
39 participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 participants
n=7 Participants
|
62 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking Status
Non-Smoker
|
72 participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 participants
n=7 Participants
|
101 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Baseline Crohn's Disease Activity Index Score
|
309.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 55.7 • n=5 Participants
|
314.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 53.5 • n=7 Participants
|
311.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 54.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Crohn's Disease History
|
139.5 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 125.1 • n=5 Participants
|
129.9 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 123.1 • n=7 Participants
|
136.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 124.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Height
|
170.3 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 • n=5 Participants
|
169.9 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=7 Participants
|
170.2 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Flares in the Past 12 Months
|
2.2 flares
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 • n=5 Participants
|
2.5 flares
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 • n=7 Participants
|
2.3 flares
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
74.89 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.22 • n=5 Participants
|
72.29 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.23 • n=7 Participants
|
74.03 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.28 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT was used for effectiveness analysis. The week 12 CDAI score was used for the analysis. Subjects without a week 12 CDAI score or with a major violation on prohibited medications were considered a treatment failure.
Clinical Remission is defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of ≤150 when evaluated at Week 12
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=157 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=78 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Remission
|
17.8 percentage of participants
|
19.2 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 12 VisitPopulation: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis.
All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=157 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=78 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Frequency and Severity of Adverse Events Through Week 12
Any Adverse Event
|
93 percentage of participants
|
93.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Frequency and Severity of Adverse Events Through Week 12
Severe Adverse Event
|
19.7 percentage of participants
|
19.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Frequency and Severity of Adverse Events Through Week 12
Device-Related Adverse Event
|
61.1 percentage of participants
|
75.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Frequency and Severity of Adverse Events Through Week 12
Serious Adverse Event
|
8.3 percentage of participants
|
6.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Frequency and Severity of Adverse Events Through Week 12
Device-Related Serious Adverse Event
|
0.6 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Frequency and Severity of Adverse Events Through Week 12
Adverse Event Leading to Device Discontinuation
|
10.8 percentage of participants
|
11.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis. The week 12 score was used for the analysis. If no week 12 score, then the week 9 score was be used. If no week 9 score, the subject was considered a treatment failure.
601-point, ordinal scale which quantifies the symptoms of patients with Crohn's Disease from 0 (complete remission) to 600 (most severe active disease). Mean change=Week 12 Mean CDAI-Baseline Mean CDAI
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=152 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=73 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
CDAI Score Change From Baseline
|
-65.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 96.6
|
-62.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 103
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis. The week 12 CDAI score or Last Observation Carried Forward was used for the analysis. Subjects with a major violation on prohibited medications were considered a treatment failure.
Clinical Response is defined as a ≥ 100-point reduction in the CDAI scores at Week 12
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=157 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=78 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Response
|
28.0 percentage of participants
|
26.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis. The week 12 score or Last Observation Carried Forward was used for the analysis.
101-point, ordinal scale measuring general health of patients from 0 (low quality of life) to 100 (high quality of life), Mean change=Week 12 Mean -Baseline Mean
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=145 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=71 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Short-Form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score
|
3.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.76
|
3.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.19
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis. The week 12 score or Last Observation Carried Forward was used for the analysis.
101-point, ordinal scale measuring general health of patients from 0 (low quality of life) to 100 (high quality of life), Mean change=Week 12 Mean -Baseline Mean
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=145 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=71 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Short-Form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score
|
2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.13
|
2.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.23
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis. The week 12 score or Last Observation Carried Forward was used for the analysis.
193-point, ordinal scale measuring disease-specific quality of life from 32 (low quality of life) to 224 (high quality of life). Mean change= Week 12 Mean-Baseline Mean
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=148 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=74 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Questionnaire (IBDQ)
|
18.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.1
|
16.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis. The week 12 score or Last Observation Carried Forward was used for the analysis.
A continuous scale that is a cardinal index of health from 0 (no impairment) to 1 (most impairment), Mean change=Week 12 Mean -Baseline Mean
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=147 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=72 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in EuroQol Score (Single Index)
|
0.0392 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2239
|
0.0917 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2648
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis. The week 12 score or Last Observation Carried Forward was used for the analysis.
101-point, ordinal scale which measures non-disease specific health-related quality of life from 0 (Worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=148 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=73 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in EuroQol Score (Visual Analog Scale)
|
4.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.8
|
5.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis. The week 12 score or Last Observation Carried Forward was used for the analysis.
101-point, ordinal scale which measures the degree to which health problems interfere with certain aspects of job performance and productivity from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all the time), Mean change=Week 12 Mean -Baseline Mean
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=132 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=63 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Work Limitations Questionnaire (Time Management)
|
-9.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.5
|
-6.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis. The week 12 score or Last Observation Carried Forward was used for the analysis.
101-point, ordinal scale which measures the degree to which health problems interfere with certain aspects of job performance and productivity from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all the time), Mean change=Week 12 Mean -Baseline Mean
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=136 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=68 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Work Limitations Questionnaire (Physical Demands)
|
-5.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.1
|
2.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis. The week 12 score or Last Observation Carried Forward was used for the analysis.
101-point, ordinal scale which measures the degree to which health problems interfere with certain aspects of job performance and productivity from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all the time), Mean change=Week 12 Mean -Baseline Mean
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=136 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=66 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Work Limitations Questionnaire (Mental-Interpersonal Demands)
|
-5.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.5
|
-2.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis. The week 12 score or Last Observation Carried Forward was used for the analysis.
101-point, ordinal scale which measures the degree to which health problems interfere with certain aspects of job performance and productivity from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all the time), Mean change=Week 12 Mean -Baseline Mean
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=132 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=63 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Work Limitations Questionnaire (Output Demands)
|
-7.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.8
|
-3.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis. The week 12 score or Last Observation Carried Forward was used for the analysis.
101-point, ordinal scale which measures the degree to which health problems interfere with certain aspects of job performance and productivity from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all the time), Mean change=Week 12 Mean -Baseline Mean
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=123 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=59 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ Index)
|
-1.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.6
|
-0.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: Endoscopic evaluations were to be performed at baseline and Week 12 on a subset of study subjects.
26-point,ordinal scale that assesses the severity of Crohn's Disease from 0 (least severe) to 26 (most severe), Mean change=Week 12 Mean -Baseline Mean
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=25 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=8 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity
|
2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.73
|
-4.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.20
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis. The week 12 score or Last Observation Carried Forward was used for the analysis.
7-point,ordinal scale that measures the subject's state of Crohn's Disease from 0 (totally inactive) to 7 (as bad as it gets), Mean change=Week 12 Mean -Baseline Mean
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=149 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=71 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Subject Global Rating
|
-0.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
-0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session were included in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). The ITT population was used for effectiveness analysis. The week 12 value or Last Observation Carried Forward was used for the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=147 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=71 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in C-Reactive Protein
|
-1.75 milligrams/liter
Standard Deviation 22.67
|
0.24 milligrams/liter
Standard Deviation 12.59
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session and had a CDAI score greater than 300 at baseline were included in the analysis population. The week 12 CDAI score was used for the analysis. Subjects without a week 12 CDAI score or subjects with a major violation on prohibited medications were considered a treatment failure.
A clinical response is defined as a 70-point decrease in CDAI score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=80 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=48 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Response in Subjects With a CDAI Score Greater Than 300
Baseline CDAI Score>300
|
43.8 percentage of participants
|
27.1 percentage of participants
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session and had a CDAI score less than or equal to 300 at baseline were included in the analysis population. The week 12 CDAI score was used for the analysis. Subjects without a week 12 CDAI score or with a major violation on prohibited medications were considered a treatment failure.
A clinical response is defined as a 70-point decrease in CDAI score
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=77 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=30 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Response in Subjects With a CDAI Score Less Than or Equal to 300
|
39.0 percentage of participants
|
43.3 percentage of participants
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session and previously used TNFa-inhibitors were included in the analysis population. The week 12 CDAI score was used for the analysis. Subjects without a week 12 CDAI score or subjects with a major violation on prohibited medications were considered a treatment failure.
A clinical response is defined as a 70-point decrease in CDAI score
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=28 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=19 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Response Based on Previous Use of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF-a) Inhibitors
|
50.0 percentage of participants
|
21.1 percentage of participants
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session and who have not used TNFa-inhibitors were included in the analysis population. The week 12 CDAI score was used for the analysis. Subjects without a week 12 CDAI score or subjects with a major violation on prohibited medications were considered a treatment failure.
A clinical response is defined as a 70-point decrease in CDAI score
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=129 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=59 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Response Based on No Previous Use of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF-a) Inhibitors
|
39.5 percentage of participants
|
37.3 percentage of participants
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session and who used 5-aminosylisalates during the study were included in the analysis population. The week 12 CDAI score was used for the analysis. Subjects without a week 12 CDAI score or subjects with a major violation on prohibited medication were considered a treatment failure.
A clinical response is defined as a 70-point decrease in CDAI score
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=64 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=23 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Response Based on Use of 5-Aminosylisalates During the Study
|
48.4 percentage of participants
|
21.7 percentage of participants
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12Population: All subjects who received at least one apheresis treatment session and who did not use 5-aminosylisalates during the study were included in the analysis population. The week 12 CDAI score was used for the analysis. Subjects without a week 12 CDAI score or subjects with a major violation on prohibited medications were considered a treatment failure.
A clinical response is defined as a 70-point decrease in CDAI score
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adacolumn
n=93 Participants
Adacolumn, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
Sham
n=55 Participants
Sham, ten apheresis sessions within 9 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Response Based on no Use of 5-Aminosylisalates During the Study
|
36.6 percentage of participants
|
38.2 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60