PI Vs. NNRTI Based Therapy for HIV Advanced Disease

NCT ID: NCT00162643

Last Updated: 2006-09-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-12-31

Study Completion Date

2007-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ritonavir boosted protease inhibitor based therapy will have equivalent antiviral efficacy over 48 weeks compared to NNRTI based therapy in patients who are antiretroviral therapy naïve and initiate therapy with CD4 counts ≤ 200/mm3.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Current guidelines for initial therapy in HIV infection recommend 2 NRTIs plus either a ritonavir boosted protease inhibitor or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). Recent data suggests that the rate of response to PI based therapy may be slightly compromised if the baseline CD4 count is ≤ 200/mm3 and the plasma HIV-1-RNA ≥ 100,000 copies/mL. This may not be equally apparent if ritonavir boosted protease inhibitors are used. The effect of baseline CD4 count and HIV-1-RNA levels on the antiviral efficacy of NNRTI based regimens has been less well characterized. A significant number of patients currently initiate therapy at late stages of progression, typically with baseline CD4 count is ≤ 200/mm3. In Mexico approximately 60% of patients who initiate therapy are within this range of CD4 cell counts. Currently, the two combinations recommended as preferred are with two NRTIs and either Efavirenz or Lopinavir/ritonavir, while other combinations of PIs and ritonavir are considered alternative.

Comparison: The efficacy of ritonavir boosted protease inhibitor based therapy versus NNRTI based therapy in patients who are antiretroviral therapy naïve and initiate therapy with a CD4 count ≤ 200/mm3.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active Protease Inhibitors Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

zidovudine+lamivudine+lopinavir/ritonavir

Intervention Type DRUG

zidovudine + lamivudine + efavirenz

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* HIV infected individuals
* Men or women at least 18 years old
* CD4+ T cells ≤200/ml
* Antiretroviral naive

Exclusion Criteria

* Suspected or documented active, untreated HIV 1 related opportunistic infection (OI) or other condition requiring acute therapy (e.g., hepatitis C virus infection)
* Platelet count \< 75,000 cells/mm3.
* Hemoglobin \< 9 g/dL .
* AST and/or ALT greater than 5 times the upper limit of normal
* Documented or suspected active tuberculosis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Council of Science and Technology, Mexico

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Juan G Sierra-Madero, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital de Especialidades Centro Medico Nacional siglo XXI

Mexico City, D.F., Mexico

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital General Regional de Leon

León, Guanajuato, Mexico

Site Status RECRUITING

Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital General Regional #53

Los Reyes Acaquilpan, State of Mexico, Mexico

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital General Regional #72

Tlalnepantla, State of Mexico, Mexico

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Juan G Sierra-Madero, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 5255-56559675

Email: [email protected]

Angelina Villasis-Keever, MD MSc

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 5255-56559675

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Leticia M Perez-Saleme, MD

Role: primary

Juan L Mosqueda-Gomez, MD

Role: primary

Angelina Villasis-Keever, MD MSc

Role: primary

Luis E. Soto-Ramirez, MD

Role: backup

Patricia Mendez-Cardos, MD

Role: primary

Fernanda Gutierrez-Escolano, MD MSc

Role: primary

Pueblito Pizano-Gonzalez, MD

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lima VD, Sierra-Madero J, Wu Z, Singer J, Wood E, Hull MW, Richard Harrigan P, Montaner JS. Comparing the efficacy of efavirenz and boosted lopinavir using viremia copy-years. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 May 6;17(1):18617. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.1.18617. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24805184 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SALUD-2003-C01-123

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id