Assessing the Effectiveness of Communication Therapy in the North West (The ACT NoW Pilot Study)

NCT ID: NCT00158106

Last Updated: 2005-09-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-02-28

Study Completion Date

2005-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study investigates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of speech and language therapy for adults who suffer communication difficulties following a stroke.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Research Question: This is the pilot phase of a two-phase study. Phase 1 - What is the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of therapy for adults with post-stroke communication impairment? to be followed in 2006 by Phase 2 - What are the effectiveness, costs and service user preferences, for the provision of speech and language therapy for communication difficulties experienced by people in hospital with a stroke? Methodology: Phase 1 - Qualitative (focus groups \& individual interviews) and quantitative (pilot RCT). Phase 2 - Qualitative (focus groups \& individual interviews) and quantitative (a pragmatic, multicentred, randomised controlled trial, stratified by diagnosis and therapist/centre, using an 'intention to treat' approach). Discrete choice experiments will be used to determine cost effectiveness.

Outcome Measures: The primary outcome will be functional communicative ability. The economic analysis will estimate the incremental cost effectiveness and net benefit of the intervention group compared to the control group from a societal perspective. The qualitative study will examine service users' and carers' perspectives on the process and effects of Speech and Language Therapy or the control treatment.

Sample Group: Adults with dysarthria or aphasia, seen early after admission to hospital with a stroke. Exclusions: subarachnoid haemorrhage, progressive dementia, expected recovery without therapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Speech or Language Impairment Following Stroke

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

functional communicative ability cost effectiveness service user preferences

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

ECT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Speech and Language therapy for dysarthria and/or aphasia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults with communication impairment following a new stroke

Exclusion Criteria

* Not fluent in the English language
* Subarachnoid haemorrhage
* Pre-existing, progressive dementia or learning disability
* Palliative care only or deceased since admission
* Resident outside the treatment area
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Audrey Bowen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The University of Manchester, UK

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Human Communication and Deafness, School of Psychological Sciences, Humanities Devas Street, The University of Manchester

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ISRCTN78617680

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

04/MRE03/30

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

HTA ref. 02/11/04

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id