Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study on the Efficacy and Mechanism of Cardiac Rehabilitation for Stem Cell Mobilization and Heart Failure Improvement (NCT NCT00154466)
NCT ID: NCT00154466
Last Updated: 2014-06-26
Results Overview
First-pass, contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion images acquired for 80 heart beats in the left ventricle. Short-axis views were obtained after intravenous administration of gadodiamide. Perfusion studies were performed at rest and during the stress induced by a 4 min infusion of dipyridamole at a concentration of 0.14 mg/kg of body weight per minute.To determine absolute MBF values at rest and stress status, we adopted a model-independent deconvolution method proposed by Jerosch-Herold et al, a method that was previously validated in experimental animal studies by comparison with blood-flow measurements with radiolabelled microspheres.
COMPLETED
NA
58 participants
3 months
2014-06-26
Participant Flow
This prospective randomised controlled study was approved by the ethics committee of the National Taiwan University Hospital. Between August 2004 and December 2005, 91 postinfarction patients were informed about the trial. Thirty-seven refused to participate and 15 did not meet the inclusion criteria.
Inclusion criteria:a successful primary stenting, a clinically stable course after MI, and no ischemia on exercise testing. Exclusion criteria: effort angina, Af, sustained ventricular arrhythmia, NYHA functional class IV, exercise-limiting diseases, severe pulmonary or renal disease, an implanted pacemaker, or claustrophobia.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Post-infarction Training
which underwent a 3-month cardiac rehabilitation program
|
Post-infarction Nontraining
in which patients continued their usual lifestyle.
|
Healthy Controls
For comparison of myocardial perfusion and angiogenic cytokines, 19 age-, weight-, and height-matched subjects without cardiovascular risk factors were selected as healthy controls.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
19
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
19
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Study on the Efficacy and Mechanism of Cardiac Rehabilitation for Stem Cell Mobilization and Heart Failure Improvement
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Postinfarction Training Patients
n=20 Participants
39 postinfarction patients randomised to either a 3-month training group (n=20) or a nontraining group (n=19), and 19 normal controls.
|
Postinfarction Nontraining Patients
n=19 Participants
39 postinfarction patients randomised to either a 3-month training group (n=20) or a nontraining group (n=19), and 19 normal controls.
|
Healthy Controls
n=19 Participants
39 postinfarction patients randomised to either a 3-month training group (n=20) or a nontraining group (n=19), and 19 normal controls.
|
Total
n=58 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=5 Participants
|
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=7 Participants
|
50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=5 Participants
|
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to the training group, which underwent a 3-month cardiac rehabilitation program, or the nontraining group in which patients continued their usual lifestyle. Healthy controls underwent the test of myocardial perfusion only at baseline. The analysis was intention-to-treat.
First-pass, contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion images acquired for 80 heart beats in the left ventricle. Short-axis views were obtained after intravenous administration of gadodiamide. Perfusion studies were performed at rest and during the stress induced by a 4 min infusion of dipyridamole at a concentration of 0.14 mg/kg of body weight per minute.To determine absolute MBF values at rest and stress status, we adopted a model-independent deconvolution method proposed by Jerosch-Herold et al, a method that was previously validated in experimental animal studies by comparison with blood-flow measurements with radiolabelled microspheres.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Post-infarction Training
n=20 Participants
Eligible patients who provided written informed consent were randomly assigned to the training group, which underwent a 3-month cardiac rehabilitation program, or the nontraining group in which patients continued their usual lifestyle. At baseline and the 3-month follow-up, all patients underwent a functional evaluation that included clinical evaluation, exercise testing, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and measurements of plasma angiogenic cytokines levels. Both groups were receiving stable and optimal pharmacologic treatment supervised by their physicians.
|
Post-infarction Nontraining
n=19 Participants
Eligible patients who provided written informed consent were randomly assigned to the training group, which underwent a 3-month cardiac rehabilitation program, or the nontraining group in which patients continued their usual lifestyle. At baseline and the 3-month follow-up, all patients underwent a functional evaluation that included clinical evaluation, exercise testing, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and measurements of plasma angiogenic cytokines levels. Both groups were receiving stable and optimal pharmacologic treatment supervised by their physicians.
|
Healthy Controls
19 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Myocardial Blood Flow at Baseline and 3-month Follow-up
Change of stress MBF in the remote myocardium
|
0.62 ml/min/g
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
-0.27 ml/min/g
Standard Deviation 0.56
|
—
|
|
Myocardial Blood Flow at Baseline and 3-month Follow-up
Change of stress MBF in the infarcted myocardium
|
0.44 ml/min/g
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
0 ml/min/g
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: We calculated that we would need 18 patients in each group to achieve a power of at least 80% to detect a 20% difference in MBF change between study groups, with a two-sided significance level of p\<0.05, and a 20% increase for the stress MBF change from baseline to 3 months' follow-up. The analysis was intention-to-treat.
Angiogenic cytokines such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) and stem cell factor (SCF) are known to increase the formation of new vessels at ischaemic sites and thus enhance myocardial perfusion. To rule out any effect of short-term exercise on cytokines levels, blood samples were always taken after at least 72 h of physical inactivity and overnight fasting when the subject had rested in the sitting position for at least 10 min. The plasma samples were immediately frozen and stored at -70°C. High-sensitivity ELISA (Bender MedSystems, R\&D) were used to measure plasma levels of SCF, SDF-1 and VEGF according to the manufacturer's protocols.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Post-infarction Training
n=20 Participants
Eligible patients who provided written informed consent were randomly assigned to the training group, which underwent a 3-month cardiac rehabilitation program, or the nontraining group in which patients continued their usual lifestyle. At baseline and the 3-month follow-up, all patients underwent a functional evaluation that included clinical evaluation, exercise testing, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and measurements of plasma angiogenic cytokines levels. Both groups were receiving stable and optimal pharmacologic treatment supervised by their physicians.
|
Post-infarction Nontraining
n=19 Participants
Eligible patients who provided written informed consent were randomly assigned to the training group, which underwent a 3-month cardiac rehabilitation program, or the nontraining group in which patients continued their usual lifestyle. At baseline and the 3-month follow-up, all patients underwent a functional evaluation that included clinical evaluation, exercise testing, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and measurements of plasma angiogenic cytokines levels. Both groups were receiving stable and optimal pharmacologic treatment supervised by their physicians.
|
Healthy Controls
n=19 Participants
19 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Angiogenic Cytokines at Baseline and 3-month Follow-up
Change of stromal-derived factor-1
|
-196 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 209
|
-68 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 175
|
-57 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 200
|
|
Angiogenic Cytokines at Baseline and 3-month Follow-up
Change of vascular endothelial growth factor
|
0.70 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
0.95 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 1.46
|
-1.2 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 2.92
|
|
Angiogenic Cytokines at Baseline and 3-month Follow-up
Change of stem cell factor
|
20 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 120
|
17 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 47
|
-18 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 60
|
Adverse Events
Postinfarction Training Patients
Postinfarction Nontraining Patients
Healthy Controls
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place