Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-07-31
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Paracetamol for Cancer Pain
NCT01313247
Usefulness of Acetaminophen Associated With Strong Opioids for Acute Pain in Cancer Patients
NCT04779567
Switching From Morphine to Oral Methadone Plus Acetaminophen in the Treatment of Cancer Pain
NCT00525967
Opioid Titration Order Sheet or Standard Care in Treating Patients With Cancer Pain
NCT00666211
Pilot Study to Evaluate the Safety and Analgesic Activity of M40403 Co-Administered With an Opioid Agent for Cancer Pain
NCT00101621
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To assess whether regular oral acetaminophen can reduce pain in cancer patients already on a strong opioid regimen.
Rationale:
It is estimated that 75% of people with advanced cancer suffer significant pain. Many of these people continue to have pain despite being on strong opioids. The rationale behind adding an additional analgesic with a different mechanism of action is to attempt to improve analgesia without increasing side effects.
Overview:
This is a double blind, randomised placebo-controlled, crossover trial to evaluate whether the addition of regular acetaminophen can reduce pain in cancer patients already on a strong opioid regimen. The study will be performed in ambulatory cancer patients who have pain that is believed to be caused by their cancer, and who have already been stabilised on an opioid regimen of \> 60mg/day of morphine equivalents. Each patient will be randomly allocated to receive either acetaminophen 1g qid or an identical appearing placebo qid for a seven-day period, and then crossed over to the other arm for a further seven-day period. Patients will complete daily pain diaries and weekly questionnaires (Brief Pain Inventory) and comparison will be made between the pain scores for the two treatment periods. Patient preference for the two treatment periods will also be evaluated.
Research Question:
A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled crossover trial to determine if the addition of regular acetaminophen (1g PO qid) leads to improved analgesic control in adult cancer patients at Princess Margaret Hospital, who are already on strong opioids (\> 60mg morphine equivalents/day) as evaluated by daily pain scores measured by Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).
Hypothesis:
Regular acetaminophen improves pain control in cancer patients who are already on strong opioid regimens.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A, 1, acetaminophen
acetaminophen
Acetaminophen
acetaminophen 1g po qid
acetaminophen
acetaminophen 1g po qid for 7 days
B placebo
placebo PO qid
placebo, sugar pill
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Acetaminophen
acetaminophen 1g po qid
acetaminophen
acetaminophen 1g po qid for 7 days
placebo, sugar pill
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age \> 18 years
3. Performance status of 0-2 by the European Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Scale
4. Sufficient English skills to be able to complete the daily diary, BPI and to understand the consent form
5. Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with severe pain are excluded, however once their pain control is optimised they are eligible.
3. Patient has received radiation therapy in the six weeks prior to commencing the study or is likely to require radiotherapy during the study period.
4. Patient has commenced, or had dose modifications, to either non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or corticosteroids in the week prior to commencing the study, or during the two-week study period.
5. Patient has commenced chemotherapy or hormone therapy in the 4 weeks prior to the study or is expected to commence chemotherapy or hormonotherapy during the study period. Patients who are stable on long-term chemotherapy or hormones are eligible for this study. Patients who receive high dose steroids as antiemetics with their chemotherapy are eligible providing they are not receiving the steroids during the study period.
6. Patient has a contraindication to acetaminophen.
7. Use of acetaminophen in the 48 hours prior to commencement of the study period.
8. Abnormal laboratory values:
* Absolute neutrophil count \< 1.5 X 10\^9/L and white blood cell (WBC) count \< 3 X 10\^9/L
* Platelet count \< 100 X 10\^9/L
* Liver transaminases \> 2.5 X upper limit of normal
* Bilirubin \> 1.5 X upper limit of normal
* Creatinine \> 1.5 X upper limit of normal
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Health Network, Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Janette Vardy, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Health Network, University of Toronto
David Warr, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Health Network, University of Toronto
Ian Tannock, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Health Network, University of Toronto
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sydney Cancer Centre
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ACETAPLAC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.