Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil in Children and Adolescent Patients With High Blood Pressure
NCT ID: NCT00151775
Last Updated: 2016-06-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
362 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-05-31
2008-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Olmesartan in Essential Hypertension
NCT00185172
A Study Of Valsartan Used To Treat Hypertension For Up To 13 Months In Hypertensive Children Ages 6 - 16 Years Of Age
NCT00171041
Efficacy, Safety, & Pharmacokinetics of Candesartan Cilexetil in Hypertensive Paediatric Subjects 6 to < 17 Years of Age
NCT00244595
Olmesartan/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg Combination Therapy Versus Olmesartan Medoxomil 40 mg Monotherapy in Essential Hypertension
NCT00441350
A Study of the Blood Pressure Lowering Ability and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil in Stage I and Stage II Hypertension
NCT00430638
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Subjects 1 to 5 years of age were enrolled into Cohort C regardless of race. Body weight of any patient was \>=5Kg. SeSBP was \>=95th percentile for gender and height-for-age, or \>=90th percentile if the patient is diabetic, or has glomerular kidney disease, or has a family history of hypertension. Patients on stable doses of concomitant antihypertensive agents including calcium channel blockers and/or diuretics only are permitted to enroll. Patients with symptomatic hypertension requiring immediate established therapy, or who are above 2 SD above the 99th percentile did not participate in the study.
The study comprised four periods. Period I was a wash-out period from Week -1 to randomization. Subjects were randomized to treatment sequences carried through the remainder of the study. Period II was a three-week, double-blind, dose-ranging period for Cohorts A and B, beginning at Day 1 and ending at the end of Week 3. In Cohorts A and B, subjects received either low-dose or high-dose olmesartan (OM) once daily. In Cohort C, Period II was an open-label OM treatment period where all subjects received 0.3 mg/kg OM per day. Period III was a double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal period beginning at Week 4 and ending after 1 or 2 weeks, depending on the seated blood pressure measurement at each weekly study visit. Subjects either continued their Period II OM regimen or switched to placebo based on the initial randomization scheme. Period IV was a 46-week open-label extension period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Period 2
For Cohorts A and B, olmesartan medoxomil suspension 2.5 mg to 40 mg in patients 6-16 years old, depending on weight.
For Cohort C, olmesartan medoxomil suspension 0.3 mg/kg to in patients 1-5 years old.
olmesartan medoxomil
Cohorts A and B: 2.5mg to 40mg olmesartan, as a suspension (depending on weight), once daily. Tablets were used to prepare a suspension.
Cohort C: 0.3mg/kg olmesartan ,as a suspension, once daily
Period 3
Cohorts A, B, C - olmesartan medoxomil suspension or placebo taken once daily. Olmesartan medoxomil dose continued as in previous period.
olmesartan medoxomil
Cohorts A and B: 2.5mg to 40mg olmesartan, as a suspension (depending on weight), once daily. Tablets were used to prepare a suspension.
Cohort C: 0.3mg/kg olmesartan ,as a suspension, once daily
placebo
Cohorts A, B, C: placebo, once daily
Period 4
Cohorts A and B: Open label olmesartan medoxomil suspension or tablets 10mg - 40 mg
Cohort C: Open label olmesartan medoxomil suspension 0.3 mg/kg - 0.6 mg/kg
olmesartan medoxomil
Cohorts A and B: Open label olmesartan medoxomil suspension or tablets 10mg - 40 mg. Tablets were used to prepare the suspension or were given directly.
Cohort C: Open label olmesartan medoxomil suspension 0.3 mg/kg - 0.6 mg/kg
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
olmesartan medoxomil
Cohorts A and B: 2.5mg to 40mg olmesartan, as a suspension (depending on weight), once daily. Tablets were used to prepare a suspension.
Cohort C: 0.3mg/kg olmesartan ,as a suspension, once daily
placebo
Cohorts A, B, C: placebo, once daily
olmesartan medoxomil
Cohorts A and B: Open label olmesartan medoxomil suspension or tablets 10mg - 40 mg. Tablets were used to prepare the suspension or were given directly.
Cohort C: Open label olmesartan medoxomil suspension 0.3 mg/kg - 0.6 mg/kg
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Negative for hepatitis B and C
* Negative for HIV
Exclusion Criteria
* Known sensitivity to olmesartan medoxomil
* Taking prohibited medication
* Consumed greater than 180 mg of caffeine daily
* Malignant hypertension
* History of congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, or obstructive valve disease
* Renal transplant within the previous 6 months
* Severe nephritic syndrome not in remission
1 Year
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Daiichi Sankyo
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Fresno, California, United States
Los Angeles, California, United States
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Miami, Florida, United States
Orlando, Florida, United States
Tampa, Florida, United States
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
Park Ridge, Illinois, United States
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Kinston, North Carolina, United States
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Portland, Oregon, United States
Beaumont, Texas, United States
Houston, Texas, United States
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
San Miguel de Tucumán, TUC, Argentina
Bahía Blanca, , Argentina
Buenos Aires, , Argentina
Capital Federal, , Argentina
Mar del Plata, , Argentina
Campinas, , Brazil
Curitiba, , Brazil
Porto Alegre, , Brazil
Recife, , Brazil
São Paulo, , Brazil
Santiago, , Chile
Bogotá, , Colombia
Cali-Valle, , Colombia
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
Mangalore, Karna, India
Vellore, Karna, India
Trivandrum, Kerala, India
Lucknow, Uttar Prad, India
Chandigarh, , India
Hyderabad, , India
New Delhi, , India
Tamil Nadu, , India
Nairobi, , Kenya
Lima, , Peru
Bloemfontein, , South Africa
Cape Town, , South Africa
Durban, KZ-Natal, , South Africa
E Cape, , South Africa
Eastern Cape, , South Africa
Park Town, Gauteng, , South Africa
Pietermaritzburg, KZ-Natal, , South Africa
Potchefstroom, Northwest, , South Africa
Pretoria, Gauteng, , South Africa
Western Cape, , South Africa
Kampala, , Uganda
Kitwe, , Zambia
Lusaka, , Zambia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CS0866-A-U301
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.