Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil in Children and Adolescent Patients With High Blood Pressure

NCT ID: NCT00151775

Last Updated: 2016-06-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

362 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-05-31

Study Completion Date

2008-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study assesses the efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in children ages 1-16 with high blood pressure. After a 5-week blinded treatment period of up to 5 weeks participants can continue to take olmesartan medoxomil (OM) for up to an additional 46 weeks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, prospective dose-ranging study in subjects 1 to 16 years of age with hypertension. Subjects were enrolled into 1 of 3 cohorts based on age and race. Subjects 6 to 16 years of age were enrolled into Cohort A. Subjects enrolled into Cohort A were stratified by age with approximately half aged 6 to 12 years and the remainder aged 13 to 16 years. Approximately 15% of the subjects in Cohort A were to be Black or of African descent. When a minimum of 28 Black subjects were randomized into Cohort A, enrollment in Cohort B was started. Black subjects only, 6 to 16 years of age, were enrolled into Cohort B. For Cohorts A and B body weight of any patient was \>=20Kg. Seated systolic blood pressure (SeSBP) was \>=95th percentile for gender and height-for-age, or \>=90th percentile if the patient is diabetic, or has glomerular kidney disease, or has a family history of hypertension. Patients with symptomatic hypertension requiring immediate established therapy, or who are above 2 standard deviations (SD) above the 99th percentile did not participate in the study.

Subjects 1 to 5 years of age were enrolled into Cohort C regardless of race. Body weight of any patient was \>=5Kg. SeSBP was \>=95th percentile for gender and height-for-age, or \>=90th percentile if the patient is diabetic, or has glomerular kidney disease, or has a family history of hypertension. Patients on stable doses of concomitant antihypertensive agents including calcium channel blockers and/or diuretics only are permitted to enroll. Patients with symptomatic hypertension requiring immediate established therapy, or who are above 2 SD above the 99th percentile did not participate in the study.

The study comprised four periods. Period I was a wash-out period from Week -1 to randomization. Subjects were randomized to treatment sequences carried through the remainder of the study. Period II was a three-week, double-blind, dose-ranging period for Cohorts A and B, beginning at Day 1 and ending at the end of Week 3. In Cohorts A and B, subjects received either low-dose or high-dose olmesartan (OM) once daily. In Cohort C, Period II was an open-label OM treatment period where all subjects received 0.3 mg/kg OM per day. Period III was a double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal period beginning at Week 4 and ending after 1 or 2 weeks, depending on the seated blood pressure measurement at each weekly study visit. Subjects either continued their Period II OM regimen or switched to placebo based on the initial randomization scheme. Period IV was a 46-week open-label extension period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Period 2

For Cohorts A and B, olmesartan medoxomil suspension 2.5 mg to 40 mg in patients 6-16 years old, depending on weight.

For Cohort C, olmesartan medoxomil suspension 0.3 mg/kg to in patients 1-5 years old.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

olmesartan medoxomil

Intervention Type DRUG

Cohorts A and B: 2.5mg to 40mg olmesartan, as a suspension (depending on weight), once daily. Tablets were used to prepare a suspension.

Cohort C: 0.3mg/kg olmesartan ,as a suspension, once daily

Period 3

Cohorts A, B, C - olmesartan medoxomil suspension or placebo taken once daily. Olmesartan medoxomil dose continued as in previous period.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

olmesartan medoxomil

Intervention Type DRUG

Cohorts A and B: 2.5mg to 40mg olmesartan, as a suspension (depending on weight), once daily. Tablets were used to prepare a suspension.

Cohort C: 0.3mg/kg olmesartan ,as a suspension, once daily

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Cohorts A, B, C: placebo, once daily

Period 4

Cohorts A and B: Open label olmesartan medoxomil suspension or tablets 10mg - 40 mg

Cohort C: Open label olmesartan medoxomil suspension 0.3 mg/kg - 0.6 mg/kg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

olmesartan medoxomil

Intervention Type DRUG

Cohorts A and B: Open label olmesartan medoxomil suspension or tablets 10mg - 40 mg. Tablets were used to prepare the suspension or were given directly.

Cohort C: Open label olmesartan medoxomil suspension 0.3 mg/kg - 0.6 mg/kg

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

olmesartan medoxomil

Cohorts A and B: 2.5mg to 40mg olmesartan, as a suspension (depending on weight), once daily. Tablets were used to prepare a suspension.

Cohort C: 0.3mg/kg olmesartan ,as a suspension, once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

Cohorts A, B, C: placebo, once daily

Intervention Type DRUG

olmesartan medoxomil

Cohorts A and B: Open label olmesartan medoxomil suspension or tablets 10mg - 40 mg. Tablets were used to prepare the suspension or were given directly.

Cohort C: Open label olmesartan medoxomil suspension 0.3 mg/kg - 0.6 mg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Benicar (olmesartan medoxomil) Benicar (olmesartan medoxomil)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The patient's seated systolic BP (SeSBP) will be greater than or equal to 95th percentile for gender and height-for- age, or greater than or equal to 90th percentile if the patient is diabetic, or has glomerular kidney disease, or has a family history of hypertension.
* Negative for hepatitis B and C
* Negative for HIV

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient should not have serious other conditions that could interfere with the analysis of the results or that could interfere with the well-being of the patient in the trial.
* Known sensitivity to olmesartan medoxomil
* Taking prohibited medication
* Consumed greater than 180 mg of caffeine daily
* Malignant hypertension
* History of congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, or obstructive valve disease
* Renal transplant within the previous 6 months
* Severe nephritic syndrome not in remission
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Daiichi Sankyo

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Park Ridge, Illinois, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Kinston, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Beaumont, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

San Miguel de Tucumán, TUC, Argentina

Site Status

Bahía Blanca, , Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Capital Federal, , Argentina

Site Status

Mar del Plata, , Argentina

Site Status

Campinas, , Brazil

Site Status

Curitiba, , Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Recife, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Bogotá, , Colombia

Site Status

Cali-Valle, , Colombia

Site Status

Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Site Status

Mangalore, Karna, India

Site Status

Vellore, Karna, India

Site Status

Trivandrum, Kerala, India

Site Status

Lucknow, Uttar Prad, India

Site Status

Chandigarh, , India

Site Status

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

New Delhi, , India

Site Status

Tamil Nadu, , India

Site Status

Nairobi, , Kenya

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Bloemfontein, , South Africa

Site Status

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Durban, KZ-Natal, , South Africa

Site Status

E Cape, , South Africa

Site Status

Eastern Cape, , South Africa

Site Status

Park Town, Gauteng, , South Africa

Site Status

Pietermaritzburg, KZ-Natal, , South Africa

Site Status

Potchefstroom, Northwest, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, Gauteng, , South Africa

Site Status

Western Cape, , South Africa

Site Status

Kampala, , Uganda

Site Status

Kitwe, , Zambia

Site Status

Lusaka, , Zambia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Brazil Chile Colombia India Kenya Peru South Africa Uganda Zambia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CS0866-A-U301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.