Study of Cisplatin/Vinorelbine +/- Cetuximab as First-line Treatment of Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (FLEX)

NCT ID: NCT00148798

Last Updated: 2014-06-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1861 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-10-31

Study Completion Date

2012-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this trial is to investigate the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy in comparison to chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer who did not received prior chemotherapy. Overall survival will be taken as primary measure of efficacy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cetuximab plus chemotherapy

cetuximab + cisplatin + vinorelbine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cetuximab + cisplatin + vinorelbine

Intervention Type DRUG

cetuximab given as an intravenous (i.v.) infusion every week (400mg/m\^2 initial dose and 250mg/m\^2 subsequent doses) until progressive disease (PD) + cisplatin 80mg/m\^2 i.v. infusion on day 1 of each 3-week cycle + vinorelbine 25mg/m\^2 i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle.

Chemotherapy alone

cisplatin + vinorelbine alone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

cisplatin + vinorelbine

Intervention Type DRUG

cisplatin 80mg/m\^2 i.v. infusion on day 1 of each 3-week cycle + vinorelbine 25mg/m\^2 i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cetuximab + cisplatin + vinorelbine

cetuximab given as an intravenous (i.v.) infusion every week (400mg/m\^2 initial dose and 250mg/m\^2 subsequent doses) until progressive disease (PD) + cisplatin 80mg/m\^2 i.v. infusion on day 1 of each 3-week cycle + vinorelbine 25mg/m\^2 i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

cisplatin + vinorelbine

cisplatin 80mg/m\^2 i.v. infusion on day 1 of each 3-week cycle + vinorelbine 25mg/m\^2 i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC, stage IIIb with documented malignant pleural effusion or stage IV
* Immunohistochemical evidence of EGFR expression on tumor tissue
* Presence of at least 1 bi-dimensionally measurable index lesion, whereby index lesions must not lie in an irradiated area

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous exposure to monoclonal antibodies, signal transduction inhibitors or EGFR-targeting therapy
* Previous chemotherapy for NSCLC
* Documented or symptomatic brain metastasis
* Superior vena cava syndrome contra-indicating hydration
* Previous malignancy in the last 5 years except basal cell carcinoma of the skin or pre-invasive carcinoma of the cervix
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert Pirker, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin I, Wien

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Research Site

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Research Site

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Melbourne, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Randwick, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Sydney, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Wodonga, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Charleroi, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Stara Zagora, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Veliko Tarnovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Antofagasta, , Chile

Site Status

Research Site

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Research Site

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Brest, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Caen, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Augsburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Gauting, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Göttingen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Großhansdorf, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Halle-Dölau, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Löwenstein, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

München, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Stralsund, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Wuppertal, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Honh Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Nyiregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szombathely, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Törökbálint, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Zalegerzeg-Pózva, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Research Site

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Carpi, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Rozzano-Milano, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Treviglio, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Nieuwegeln, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Zwolle, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Olsztyn, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Otwock, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Posnan, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Research Site

Banská Bystrica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Nitra-Zobor, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Poprad, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Barakaldo (Bilbao), , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Donostia / San Sebastian, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Elche Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Granollers, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Pamplona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Pontevedra, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Terrassa, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Thun, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Taipei, Tao Yuan County, Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Research Site

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Poltava, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Sumy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Ternopil, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Uzhhorod, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Aberdeen, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Leicester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Poole, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Sutton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Wolverhampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Chile Czechia France Germany Hong Kong Hungary Ireland Italy Mexico Netherlands Poland Russia Singapore Slovakia South Korea Spain Sweden Switzerland Taiwan Turkey (Türkiye) Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pirker R, Pereira JR, Szczesna A, von Pawel J, Krzakowski M, Ramlau R, Vynnychenko I, Park K, Yu CT, Ganul V, Roh JK, Bajetta E, O'Byrne K, de Marinis F, Eberhardt W, Goddemeier T, Emig M, Gatzemeier U; FLEX Study Team. Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (FLEX): an open-label randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2009 May 2;373(9674):1525-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60569-9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19410716 (View on PubMed)

Pirker R, Pereira JR, Szczesna A, von Pawel J, Krzakowski M, Ramlau R, Vynnychenko I, Park K, Eberhardt WE, de Marinis F, Heeger S, Goddemeier T, O'Byrne KJ, Gatzemeier U. Prognostic factors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: data from the phase III FLEX study. Lung Cancer. 2012 Aug;77(2):376-82. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Apr 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22498112 (View on PubMed)

Pirker R, Pereira JR, von Pawel J, Krzakowski M, Ramlau R, Park K, de Marinis F, Eberhardt WE, Paz-Ares L, Storkel S, Schumacher KM, von Heydebreck A, Celik I, O'Byrne KJ. EGFR expression as a predictor of survival for first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of data from the phase 3 FLEX study. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70318-7. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22056021 (View on PubMed)

O'Byrne KJ, Gatzemeier U, Bondarenko I, Barrios C, Eschbach C, Martens UM, Hotko Y, Kortsik C, Paz-Ares L, Pereira JR, von Pawel J, Ramlau R, Roh JK, Yu CT, Stroh C, Celik I, Schueler A, Pirker R. Molecular biomarkers in non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of data from the phase 3 FLEX study. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Aug;12(8):795-805. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70189-9. Epub 2011 Jul 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21782507 (View on PubMed)

Gatzemeier U, von Pawel J, Vynnychenko I, Zatloukal P, de Marinis F, Eberhardt WE, Paz-Ares L, Schumacher KM, Goddemeier T, O'Byrne KJ, Pirker R. First-cycle rash and survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving cetuximab in combination with first-line chemotherapy: a subgroup analysis of data from the FLEX phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jan;12(1):30-7. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70278-3. Epub 2010 Dec 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21169060 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EMR 62202-046

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Study in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT01232452 COMPLETED PHASE2