Using Tailored Emails to Motivate Healthy Behavior Among Employees

NCT ID: NCT00147927

Last Updated: 2007-08-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-12-31

Study Completion Date

2005-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-component email health promotion program on employee adoption of health promoting behaviors and secondarily on health status, work productivity and health care costs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Specific Aims are:

* To demonstrate the feasibility and assess the acceptability of email health promotion among diverse employee groups;
* To evaluate short and intermediate-term changes in health behaviors (e.g., daily fruit/vegetable intake, weekly physical activity) at 6 and 12 months;
* To assess change in health status (SF-12), work productivity, and healthcare costs among email program users and controls;
* To identify person predictors of sustained voluntary participation in a 6 month email health promotion program among the workforce population;
* To disseminate the results to maximize influence on e-health promotion, employer health promotion programs, health insurance policy, and research.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Health Behavior

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sequential emails and web support

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult employee of participating worksite
* Access to desktop computer

Exclusion Criteria

* Under 18 years of age
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Patricia D Franklin, MD MPH MBA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Massachusetts, Worcester

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Daviglus ML, Liu K, Yan LL, Pirzada A, Manheim L, Manning W, Garside DB, Wang R, Dyer AR, Greenland P, Stamler J. Relation of body mass index in young adulthood and middle age to Medicare expenditures in older age. JAMA. 2004 Dec 8;292(22):2743-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.22.2743.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15585734 (View on PubMed)

Pelletier KR. A review and analysis of the clinical- and cost-effectiveness studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease management programs at the worksite: 1998-2000 update. Am J Health Promot. 2001 Nov-Dec;16(2):107-16. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-16.2.107.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11727590 (View on PubMed)

Aldana SG, Merrill RM, Price K, Hardy A, Hager R. Financial impact of a comprehensive multisite workplace health promotion program. Prev Med. 2005 Feb;40(2):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15533521 (View on PubMed)

Glasgow RE, McCaul KD, Fisher KJ. Participation in worksite health promotion: a critique of the literature and recommendations for future practice. Health Educ Q. 1993 Fall;20(3):391-408. doi: 10.1177/109019819302000309.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8307762 (View on PubMed)

Lewis RJ, Huebner WW, Yarborough CM 3rd. Characteristics of participants and nonparticipants in worksite health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996 Nov-Dec;11(2):99-106. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.99.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10163602 (View on PubMed)

Grosch JW, Alterman T, Petersen MR, Murphy LR. Worksite health promotion programs in the U.S.: factors associated with availability and participation. Am J Health Promot. 1998 Sep-Oct;13(1):36-45. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-13.1.36.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10186933 (View on PubMed)

Crump CE, Earp JA, Kozma CM, Hertz-Picciotto I. Effect of organization-level variables on differential employee participation in 10 federal worksite health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1996 May;23(2):204-23. doi: 10.1177/109019819602300206.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8744873 (View on PubMed)

Abrams DB, Boutwell WB, Grizzle J, Heimendinger J, Sorensen G, Varnes J. Cancer control at the workplace: the Working Well Trial. Prev Med. 1994 Jan;23(1):15-27. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1994.1003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8016028 (View on PubMed)

Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2003; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2003(b).

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Roizen MF, Stephenson M. Real Age: Are you as Young as you Can Be? Cliff Street Books 1996.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

49924

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id