Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparing Synthetic Bone Alone Versus Synthetic Bone With Bone Marrow in Bone Lesions (NCT NCT00147823)
NCT ID: NCT00147823
Last Updated: 2015-06-08
Results Overview
Percentage of graft material that is resorbed (disappears) from area of incorporation, at 24 months .Participants were seen 24 month follow with radiographs to review resorption of graft material. There a several that had incomplete follow up or radiographs not taken.
COMPLETED
NA
63 participants
24 months
2015-06-08
Participant Flow
Subjects seen by Dr. Damron in his clinical office were asked to participate, if they met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Dates of recruitment February 2005, through August 2007
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Vitoss Alone
No bone marrow aspirate used
|
Vitoss With Bone Marrow Aspirate
Addition of Vitoss to the bone marrow aspirate
Vitoss : Synthetic bone graft material
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
32
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
Week 6 Visit
|
26
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
Month 3 Visit
|
25
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
Month 6 Visit
|
25
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
Month 12 Visit
|
21
|
25
|
|
Overall Study
Month 12 CT Scan
|
20
|
25
|
|
Overall Study
Month 18 Visit
|
21
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
Month 24 Visit
|
21
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
19
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
15
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Vitoss Alone
No bone marrow aspirate used
|
Vitoss With Bone Marrow Aspirate
Addition of Vitoss to the bone marrow aspirate
Vitoss : Synthetic bone graft material
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
6
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Did not receive vitoss due to infection
|
6
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Comparing Synthetic Bone Alone Versus Synthetic Bone With Bone Marrow in Bone Lesions
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Vitoss Used With Bone Marrow Aspirate
n=31 Participants
Vitoss: Synthetic bone graft material mixed with Bone Marrow aspirate
|
Vitoss Only
n=32 Participants
Vitoss: Synthetic bone graft material alone
|
Total
n=63 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
16 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
15 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
15 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
16 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
31 participants
n=93 Participants
|
32 participants
n=4 Participants
|
63 participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 monthsPopulation: Number of participants analyzed, refers to the number of participants who completed follow up or had radiographs taken at this timepoint.
Percentage of graft material that is resorbed (disappears) from area of incorporation, at 24 months .Participants were seen 24 month follow with radiographs to review resorption of graft material. There a several that had incomplete follow up or radiographs not taken.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vitoss
n=18 Participants
Addition of Vitoss to the bone marrow aspirate
Vitoss: Synthetic bone graft material
|
Vitoss Alone
n=19 Participants
Vitoss alone, not bone marrow aspirate used
|
|---|---|---|
|
Resorption of Graft Material (GR) Compared at 24 Months
|
51 percentage of resorption
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
47 percentage of resorption
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 monthsPopulation: Number of participants analyzed, refers to the number of participants who completed follow up or had radiographs at this time point.
Bone trabeculation through the bone lesion at 24 months as determined with radiographs. There were several participants with incomplete follow up or incomplete radiographs. .
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vitoss
n=18 Participants
Addition of Vitoss to the bone marrow aspirate
Vitoss: Synthetic bone graft material
|
Vitoss Alone
n=19 Participants
Vitoss alone, not bone marrow aspirate used
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bone Trabeculation Through the Defect (BT) Compared at 24 Months
|
95 percentage of trabeculation
Interval 25.0 to 100.0
|
98 percentage of trabeculation
Interval 25.0 to 100.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: Number of participants analyzed, refers to the number of participants who completed follow up or had radiographs taken at this time point.
Percentage of graft material that is resorbed (disappears) from area of incorporation at 18 months. Participants were seen 18 month follow with radiographs to review resorption of graft material. There a several that had incomplete follow up or radiographs not taken.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vitoss
n=17 Participants
Addition of Vitoss to the bone marrow aspirate
Vitoss: Synthetic bone graft material
|
Vitoss Alone
n=17 Participants
Vitoss alone, not bone marrow aspirate used
|
|---|---|---|
|
Resorption of Graft Material (GR) Compared at 18 Months
|
47 percentage of resorption
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
44 percentage of resorption
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: Number of participants analyzed, refers to the number of participants who completed follow up or had radiographs taken at this time point.
Bone trabeculation through the bone lesion at 18 months with reviewed with radiographs. There were several participants with incomplete follow up or incomplete radiographs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vitoss
n=17 Participants
Addition of Vitoss to the bone marrow aspirate
Vitoss: Synthetic bone graft material
|
Vitoss Alone
n=17 Participants
Vitoss alone, not bone marrow aspirate used
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bone Trabeculation Through the Defect (BT) Compared at 18 Months
|
90 percentage of trabeculation
Interval 25.0 to 100.0
|
90 percentage of trabeculation
Interval 25.0 to 100.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Number of participants analyzed, refers to the number of participants who completed follow up or had radiographs taken at this time point.
Percentage of graft material that is resorbed (disappears) from area of incorporation at 12months. Participants were seen 12 month follow with radiographs to review resorption of graft material. There a several that had incomplete follow up or radiographs not taken.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vitoss
n=23 Participants
Addition of Vitoss to the bone marrow aspirate
Vitoss: Synthetic bone graft material
|
Vitoss Alone
n=19 Participants
Vitoss alone, not bone marrow aspirate used
|
|---|---|---|
|
Resorption of Graft Material (GR) Compared at 12 Months
|
45 percentage of resorption
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
42 percentage of resorption
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Number of participants analyzed, refers to the number of participants who completed follow up or had radiographs taken at this time point.
Bone trabeculation through the bone lesion at 12 months was reviewed with radiographs. There were several participants with incomplete follow up or incomplete radiographs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vitoss
n=23 Participants
Addition of Vitoss to the bone marrow aspirate
Vitoss: Synthetic bone graft material
|
Vitoss Alone
n=19 Participants
Vitoss alone, not bone marrow aspirate used
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bone Trabeculation Through the Defect (BT) Compared at 12 Months
|
42 percentage of trabeculation
Interval 25.0 to 100.0
|
47 percentage of trabeculation
Interval 25.0 to 100.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Number of participants analyzed, refers to the number of participants who completed follow up or had radiographs taken at this time point.
Percentage of graft material that is resorbed (disappears) from area of incorporation at 6 months. Participants were seen 6 month follow with radiographs to review resorption of graft material. There a several that had incomplete follow up or radiographs not taken.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vitoss
n=19 Participants
Addition of Vitoss to the bone marrow aspirate
Vitoss: Synthetic bone graft material
|
Vitoss Alone
n=24 Participants
Vitoss alone, not bone marrow aspirate used
|
|---|---|---|
|
Resorption of Graft Material (GR) Compared at 6 Months
|
28 percentage of resorption
Interval 0.0 to 75.0
|
25 percentage of resorption
Interval 0.0 to 75.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Number of participants analyzed, refers to the number of participants who completed follow up or had radiographs taken at this time point.
Bone trabeculation through the bone lesion at 6 months was reviewed with radiographs. There were several participants with incomplete follow up or incomplete radiographs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vitoss
n=19 Participants
Addition of Vitoss to the bone marrow aspirate
Vitoss: Synthetic bone graft material
|
Vitoss Alone
n=24 Participants
Vitoss alone, not bone marrow aspirate used
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bone Trabeculation Through the Defect (BT) Compared at 6 Months
|
31 percentage of trabeculation
Interval 0.0 to 75.0
|
33 percentage of trabeculation
Interval 0.0 to 75.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: Number of participants analyzed, refers to the number of participants who completed follow up or had radiographs taken at this time point.
Percentage of graft material that is resorbed (disappears) from area of incorporation at 3 months. Participants were seen 3 month follow with radiographs to review resorption of graft material. There a several that had incomplete follow up or radiographs not taken.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vitoss
n=21 Participants
Addition of Vitoss to the bone marrow aspirate
Vitoss: Synthetic bone graft material
|
Vitoss Alone
n=25 Participants
Vitoss alone, not bone marrow aspirate used
|
|---|---|---|
|
Resorption of Graft Material (GR) Compared at 3 Months
|
18 percentage of resorption
Interval 0.0 to 75.0
|
22 percentage of resorption
Interval 0.0 to 75.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: Number of participants analyzed, refers to the number of participants who completed follow up or had radiographs taken at this time point.
Bone trabeculation through the bone lesion compared at 3 months were reviewed with radiographs. There were several participants with incomplete follow up or incomplete radiographs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vitoss
n=21 Participants
Addition of Vitoss to the bone marrow aspirate
Vitoss: Synthetic bone graft material
|
Vitoss Alone
n=25 Participants
Vitoss alone, not bone marrow aspirate used
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bone Trabeculation Through the Defect (BT) Compared at 3 Months
|
8 percentage of trabeculation
Interval 0.0 to 75.0
|
10 percentage of trabeculation
Interval 0.0 to 75.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: Number of participants analyzed, refers to the number of participants who completed follow up or had radiographs taken at this time point.
Percentage of graft material that is resorbed (disappears) from area of incorporation at 6 weeks. Participants were seen 6 week follow with radiographs to review resorption of graft material. There a several that had incomplete follow up or radiographs not taken.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vitoss
n=27 Participants
Addition of Vitoss to the bone marrow aspirate
Vitoss: Synthetic bone graft material
|
Vitoss Alone
n=25 Participants
Vitoss alone, not bone marrow aspirate used
|
|---|---|---|
|
Resorption of Graft Material (GR) Compared at 6 Weeks
|
6 percentage of resorption
Interval 0.0 to 50.0
|
8 percentage of resorption
Interval 0.0 to 50.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: Number of participants analyzed, refers to the number of participants who completed follow up or had radiographs taken at this time point.
Bone trabeculation through the bone lesion compared at 6 weeks were reviewed with radiographs. There were several participants with incomplete follow up or incomplete radiographs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vitoss
n=27 Participants
Addition of Vitoss to the bone marrow aspirate
Vitoss: Synthetic bone graft material
|
Vitoss Alone
n=25 Participants
Vitoss alone, not bone marrow aspirate used
|
|---|---|---|
|
Bone Trabeculation Through the Defect (BT) Compared at 6 Weeks
|
4 percentage of trabeculation
Interval 0.0 to 50.0
|
7 percentage of trabeculation
Interval 0.0 to 50.0
|
Adverse Events
Vitoss Without Bone Marrow Aspirate
Vitoss With Bone Marrow Aspirate
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Vitoss Without Bone Marrow Aspirate
n=32 participants at risk
subjects who received Vitoss without bone marrow aspirate
|
Vitoss With Bone Marrow Aspirate
n=31 participants at risk
subjects who received Vitoss with bone marrow aspirate
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pneumonia
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
0.00%
0/31 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Knee pain-persistent
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
recurrence of cyst
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
fracture of wrist
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
0.00%
0/31 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
low back pain
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
0.00%
0/31 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
bilateral leg weakness
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
0.00%
0/31 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
drainage at incision
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
9.7%
3/31 • Number of events 3 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
femur pain
|
0.00%
0/32 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
hip pain
|
0.00%
0/32 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
shoulder pain
|
0.00%
0/32 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
cervical neuropathy
|
0.00%
0/32 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
rash at incision
|
0.00%
0/32 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
fracture of shoulder through lesion
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
0.00%
0/31 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
fracture of femur through lesion
|
0.00%
0/32 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
hematoma
|
0.00%
0/32 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • 6 week, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Subjects were asked at their office visits if they had any new complications, any new diagnosis/treatments, also if records were received from another physician, this information was collected.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place