Irinotecan Versus Only Best Supportive Care for Gastric Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00144378
Last Updated: 2007-04-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2002-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Irinotecan shows response rates of 20% in the first line therapy with high rates od disease stabilization. There are few trials investigating irinotecan in the second line setting. Response rates of 20% are reported in tis setting. Irinotecan is supplied without costs from the company Pfizer.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Arm A:
Irinotecan 250/350 mg/m2 q3w
1. Cycle:250mg/m2/ 30min
2. Cycle:If no toxicity\>2° CTC, nor Leuko-thrombopenia\>3° occured, dose is increased to 350mg/m2 Arm B. Best supportive care
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
SINGLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Irinotecan
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient with distant metastases laparoscopically proven operative incurability of an locally advanced gastric cancer or patient with a tumor recurrence after gastrectomy
* Patient with progressive disease under a palliative first-line chemotherapy or progressive disease within 6 months after termination of a first-line chemotherapy, defined as objective progression by imaging techniques according to WHO criteria
* Age 18 and 75 years
* Sufficient liver function, defined as serum-bilirubin \<1,5 mg/dl (1,5 upper normal limit), ALT und AST \< 3x upper normal limit
* Sufficient renal function, defined as serum creatinine \< 1,25 x upper normal limit or creatinine clearance \>60ml/min calculated according to Crockroft-Gault
* Contraction for patient with reproductive potential
* Karnofsky-Index \>60%
* Measurable or evaluable tumor manifestation
Exclusion Criteria
* KI 50% or less
* Patient who have already received a second line chemotherapy for the metastatic setting (adjuvant chemotherapy and one line of palliative chemotherapy os allowed, biologic prior therapies are allowed)
* Prior or current second malignancy despite of basal carcinoma of the skin and curatively treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix
* Uncontrolled infection
* CNS metastases
* Other severe medical illness
* Prior major surgery less than 2 weeks ago
* Parallel treatment with another experimental therapy
* Parallel treatment with another therapy aiming at tumor reduction
* Chronic diarrhea, subileus
* Chronic inflammatory bowel disease or intestinal obstruction
* Pretreatment with irinotecan
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
P Reichardt MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Charité, University,Campus Virchow Klinikum, Dep. of Hematology and Oncology,Berlin
PC Thuss-Patience MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Charité, University,Campus Virchow Klinikum,Dep. of Hematology and Oncology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Charité,Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Dep. orf Hematology and Oncology,
Berlin, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Thuss-Patience PC, Kretzschmar A, Bichev D, Deist T, Hinke A, Breithaupt K, Dogan Y, Gebauer B, Schumacher G, Reichardt P. Survival advantage for irinotecan versus best supportive care as second-line chemotherapy in gastric cancer--a randomised phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO). Eur J Cancer. 2011 Oct;47(15):2306-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.002.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
irinotecan vs. bsc
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id