Irinotecan Versus Only Best Supportive Care for Gastric Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00144378

Last Updated: 2007-04-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The median survival at progression after first-line chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer is about 2.5 months. There are no data which a possible benefit of second line therapy. for this reason a trial which investigates a possible benefit or chemotherapy compared to best supportive care as second line treatment is urgently necessary.

Irinotecan shows response rates of 20% in the first line therapy with high rates od disease stabilization. There are few trials investigating irinotecan in the second line setting. Response rates of 20% are reported in tis setting. Irinotecan is supplied without costs from the company Pfizer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Metastatic gastric cancer, progressive disease after one palliative chemotherapy

Arm A:

Irinotecan 250/350 mg/m2 q3w

1. Cycle:250mg/m2/ 30min
2. Cycle:If no toxicity\>2° CTC, nor Leuko-thrombopenia\>3° occured, dose is increased to 350mg/m2 Arm B. Best supportive care

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stomach Neoplasm Neoplasm Metastasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Irinotecan

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of stomach or the gastro-esophageal junction
* Patient with distant metastases laparoscopically proven operative incurability of an locally advanced gastric cancer or patient with a tumor recurrence after gastrectomy
* Patient with progressive disease under a palliative first-line chemotherapy or progressive disease within 6 months after termination of a first-line chemotherapy, defined as objective progression by imaging techniques according to WHO criteria
* Age 18 and 75 years
* Sufficient liver function, defined as serum-bilirubin \<1,5 mg/dl (1,5 upper normal limit), ALT und AST \< 3x upper normal limit
* Sufficient renal function, defined as serum creatinine \< 1,25 x upper normal limit or creatinine clearance \>60ml/min calculated according to Crockroft-Gault
* Contraction for patient with reproductive potential
* Karnofsky-Index \>60%
* Measurable or evaluable tumor manifestation

Exclusion Criteria

* Tumor progression later than 6 months after termination of first-line chemotherapy
* KI 50% or less
* Patient who have already received a second line chemotherapy for the metastatic setting (adjuvant chemotherapy and one line of palliative chemotherapy os allowed, biologic prior therapies are allowed)
* Prior or current second malignancy despite of basal carcinoma of the skin and curatively treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix
* Uncontrolled infection
* CNS metastases
* Other severe medical illness
* Prior major surgery less than 2 weeks ago
* Parallel treatment with another experimental therapy
* Parallel treatment with another therapy aiming at tumor reduction
* Chronic diarrhea, subileus
* Chronic inflammatory bowel disease or intestinal obstruction
* Pretreatment with irinotecan
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Charite University, Berlin, Germany

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

P Reichardt MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Charité, University,Campus Virchow Klinikum, Dep. of Hematology and Oncology,Berlin

PC Thuss-Patience MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Charité, University,Campus Virchow Klinikum,Dep. of Hematology and Oncology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Charité,Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Dep. orf Hematology and Oncology,

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Thuss-Patience PC, Kretzschmar A, Bichev D, Deist T, Hinke A, Breithaupt K, Dogan Y, Gebauer B, Schumacher G, Reichardt P. Survival advantage for irinotecan versus best supportive care as second-line chemotherapy in gastric cancer--a randomised phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO). Eur J Cancer. 2011 Oct;47(15):2306-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.002.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21742485 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

irinotecan vs. bsc

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id