Trial Outcomes & Findings for Phase I/II Dose-escalation Study of Lutetium-177-labeled cG250 in Patients With Advanced Renal Cancer (NCT NCT00142415)
NCT ID: NCT00142415
Last Updated: 2022-10-28
Results Overview
Toxicity was graded in accordance with the NCI CTCAE version 3.0. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported based on clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, and vital signs from pre-treatment through 4 weeks after the last dose of study treatment.
Recruitment status
COMPLETED
Study phase
PHASE1/PHASE2
Target enrollment
26 participants
Primary outcome timeframe
Up to 1 year
Results posted on
2022-10-28
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cohort 1, 30 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 30 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 2, 40 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 40 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 3, 50 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 50 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 4, 60 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 60 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 5, 70 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 70 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 6, 65 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 65 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
3
|
3
|
6
|
3
|
3
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
6
|
3
|
2
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Cohort 1, 30 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 30 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 2, 40 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 40 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 3, 50 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 50 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 4, 60 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 60 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 5, 70 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 70 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 6, 65 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 65 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Phase I/II Dose-escalation Study of Lutetium-177-labeled cG250 in Patients With Advanced Renal Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cohort 1, 30 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 30 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 2, 40 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 40 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 3, 50 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=6 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 50 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 4, 60 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 60 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 5, 70 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 70 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 6, 65 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=8 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 65 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Total
n=26 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.74 • n=5 Participants
|
60.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.86 • n=7 Participants
|
64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.87 • n=5 Participants
|
51.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.11 • n=4 Participants
|
44.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.80 • n=21 Participants
|
58.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.94 • n=10 Participants
|
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.53 • n=115 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index
|
23.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.29 • n=5 Participants
|
28.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.38 • n=7 Participants
|
27.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.52 • n=5 Participants
|
28.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.84 • n=4 Participants
|
31.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.35 • n=21 Participants
|
26.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.78 • n=10 Participants
|
27.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.95 • n=115 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 1 yearPopulation: The Safety Analysis Set comprises all subjects who received at least 1 dose of 111-In-DOTA-cG250 or 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250.
Toxicity was graded in accordance with the NCI CTCAE version 3.0. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported based on clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, and vital signs from pre-treatment through 4 weeks after the last dose of study treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, 30 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 30 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 2, 40 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 40 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 3, 50 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=6 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 50 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 4, 60 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 60 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 5, 70 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 70 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 6, 65 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=8 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 65 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Any TEAE
|
3 participants
|
3 participants
|
6 participants
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Maximum Grade 3 TEAE
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Maximum Grade 4 TEAE
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Treatment-related TEAE
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
6 participants
|
3 participants
|
2 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
SAE
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Death
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
TEAE Leading to Discontinuation
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: The Safety Analysis Set comprises all subjects who received at least 1 dose of 111-In-DOTA-cG250 or 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250.
Subjects were monitored for AEs for ≥ 8 weeks after the last infusion of 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250 before dose escalation could be implemented. Toxicity was graded in accordance with the NCI CTCAE version 3.0. DLT was defined as the following treatment-related events: ≥ Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity; ≥ Grade 4 hematologic toxicity (platelets \< 25 × 10\^9/L or leukocytes \< 1.0 × 10\^9/L) that persisted for \> 4 weeks except anemia; thrombocytopenia \< 10 × 10\^9/L; clinically relevant myelotoxicity that required hospitalization and/or blood product transfusion (e.g., uncontrolled bleeding, infections that had to be treated clinically).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, 30 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 30 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 2, 40 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 40 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 3, 50 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=6 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 50 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 4, 60 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 60 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 5, 70 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 70 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 6, 65 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=8 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 65 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) During Cycle 1
Any DLT
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) During Cycle 1
Grade 4 Thrombocytopenia
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) During Cycle 1
Grade 4 Leukopenia
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) During Cycle 1
Grade 4 Neutropenia
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) During Cycle 1
Grade 3 Epistaxis
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) During Cycle 1
Grade 3 Fatigue
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) During Cycle 1
Grade 3 Hematoma
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: The Dosimetry Evaluable Analysis Set comprises all subjects who received at least 1 dose of 177-Lu-cG250.
After each 177-Lu-cG250 administration, 3 whole-body scintigrams were acquired (directly after injection and 2-4 days and 5-7 days post-injection) and blood samples were drawn at 5, 30, 60, and 120 min, 2-4 days, and 5-7 days post-infusion. Estimated radiation absorbed doses were calculated according to the Medical Internal Radiation Dose scheme, which permits estimation of the factors required to calculate dose to one organ attributable to a source in another organ.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, 30 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=20 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 30 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 2, 40 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 40 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 3, 50 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 50 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 4, 60 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 60 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 5, 70 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 70 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 6, 65 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 65 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Radiation Absorbed Doses by Organ for 177-Lu-cG250
Heart Wall
|
0.76 mGy/MBq
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Radiation Absorbed Doses by Organ for 177-Lu-cG250
Testes
|
1.90 mGy/MBq
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Radiation Absorbed Doses by Organ for 177-Lu-cG250
Metastases
|
5.72 mGy/MBq
Standard Deviation 4.52
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Radiation Absorbed Doses by Organ for 177-Lu-cG250
Red Marrow (Image-based)
|
0.44 mGy/MBq
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Radiation Absorbed Doses by Organ for 177-Lu-cG250
Red Marrow (Blood-based)
|
0.35 mGy/MBq
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Radiation Absorbed Doses by Organ for 177-Lu-cG250
Kidney
|
1.30 mGy/MBq
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Radiation Absorbed Doses by Organ for 177-Lu-cG250
Lungs
|
0.49 mGy/MBq
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Radiation Absorbed Doses by Organ for 177-Lu-cG250
Whole Body
|
0.24 mGy/MBq
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Radiation Absorbed Doses by Organ for 177-Lu-cG250
Liver
|
1.26 mGy/MBq
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 9 monthsPopulation: The Evaluable Analysis Set comprises subjects who completed Cycle 1 (ie, received both 111-In-DOTA-cG250 and 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250) and had at least 1 post-baseline response assessment. The Evaluable Analysis Set includes 23 subjects who completed Cycle 1, 12 subjects who completed Cycle 2, and 4 subjects who completed Cycle 3.
Tumor responses were evaluated using computed tomography and categorized according to RECIST v1.0 at baseline and at the end of every cycle (every 12 weeks) or after recovery from toxicity. Per RECIST v1.0 for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions \[no evidence of disease\]; Partial Response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD): ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1, 30 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 30 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 2, 40 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 40 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 3, 50 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=6 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 50 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 4, 60 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 60 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 5, 70 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=2 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 70 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 6, 65 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=6 Participants
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 65 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor Response
Cycle 1: Stable Disease
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
5 participants
|
2 participants
|
2 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor Response
Cycle 1: Progressive Disease
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor Response
Cycle 2: Partial Response
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor Response
Cycle 2: Stable Disease
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor Response
Cycle 2: Progressive Disease
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor Response
Cycle 3: Stable Disease
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor Response
Cycle 3: Progressive Disease
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
Adverse Events
Cohort 1, 30 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Cohort 2, 40 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Cohort 3, 50 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 6 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Cohort 4, 60 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Cohort 5, 70 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Cohort 6, 65 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 6 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Total
Serious events: 6 serious events
Other events: 23 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort 1, 30 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 participants at risk
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 30 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 2, 40 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 participants at risk
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 40 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 3, 50 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=6 participants at risk
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 50 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 4, 60 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 participants at risk
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 60 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 5, 70 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 participants at risk
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 70 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 6, 65 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=8 participants at risk
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 65 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Total
n=26 participants at risk
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 30 to 70 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
12.5%
1/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
11.5%
3/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
12.5%
1/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
7.7%
2/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
3.8%
1/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
12.5%
1/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
3.8%
1/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
3.8%
1/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
12.5%
1/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
3.8%
1/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
3.8%
1/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemoptysis
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
3.8%
1/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract inflammation
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
3.8%
1/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort 1, 30 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 participants at risk
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 30 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 2, 40 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 participants at risk
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 40 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 3, 50 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=6 participants at risk
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 50 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 4, 60 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 participants at risk
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 60 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 5, 70 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=3 participants at risk
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 70 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Cohort 6, 65 mCi/m^2 177-Lu-DOTA-cG250
n=8 participants at risk
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 65 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
Total
n=26 participants at risk
111-In-DOTA-cG250: On Day 1, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 5 mCi of 111-In.
177-Lu-DOTA-cG250: On Day 8, 9, or 10, subjects received a single dose of 10 mg of cG250 coupled to DOTA and labeled with 30 to 70 mCi/m\^2 of 177-Lu.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
50.0%
3/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
62.5%
5/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
42.3%
11/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
50.0%
4/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
30.8%
8/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
25.0%
2/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
19.2%
5/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
12.5%
1/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
7.7%
2/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
11.5%
3/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
7.7%
2/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
4/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
3/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
62.5%
5/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
61.5%
16/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
37.5%
3/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
23.1%
6/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
25.0%
2/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
23.1%
6/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
12.5%
1/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
15.4%
4/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
12.5%
1/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
11.5%
3/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abnormal faeces
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
7.7%
2/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
7.7%
2/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
83.3%
5/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
100.0%
3/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
37.5%
3/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
57.7%
15/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
2/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
12.5%
1/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
11.5%
3/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
7.7%
2/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
12.5%
1/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
15.4%
4/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
12.5%
1/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
7.7%
2/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
12.5%
1/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
7.7%
2/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
7.7%
2/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
37.5%
3/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
23.1%
6/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
7.7%
2/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
11.5%
3/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
50.0%
3/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
12.5%
1/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
26.9%
7/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
66.7%
2/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
2/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
25.0%
2/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
23.1%
6/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
7.7%
2/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
16.7%
1/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
19.2%
5/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
12.5%
1/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
7.7%
2/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
33.3%
1/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/6 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
0.00%
0/3 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
25.0%
2/8 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
11.5%
3/26 • All AEs occurring between the signing of informed consent and the off-study date were documented, regardless of the causal relationship to study drug. AEs occurring after the first dose of study drug were considered treatment emergent (i.e., TEAEs). The AE reporting period for this study was up to 1 year for each subject.
AE documentation included onset/resolution dates, severity using NCI CTCAE (v3.0), seriousness, study drug action taken, treatment, and outcome. In summaries, treatment-related AEs included those with a "possible", "probable", or "definite" relationship to study drug; preferred terms were counted only once per subject at the maximum reported grade.
|
Additional Information
Jonathan Skipper PhD
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
Phone: 12124501539
Email: [email protected]
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60