Implementation of Quality of Life Diagnostics and Therapy
NCT ID: NCT00141635
Last Updated: 2005-09-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
190 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2002-12-31
2004-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The acting persons and institutions in this clinical path are the breast cancer patients, the hospitals, the family doctors or gynaecologists, and a QL-study team. Starting point is the QL-assessment either in the hospital or in doctors' practice (EORTC QLQ-C30 plus BR-23). The caring physician documents the patients' health status. Based on these two pieces of information, the QL-study team writes up a medical/QL-opinion plus therapy recommendation. This report is sent to the caring physician. The effectiveness of the therapy recommendation is assessed in the following QL-assessment. This clinical path is implemented via three interrelated methods of implementation: local opinion leaders, outreach visits, and quality circle.
A total of 38 physicians were made familiar with QL-diagnostics through outreach visits, and 12 opinion leaders were identified and convinced to support this project. The quality circle provided regular CME meetings on QL-enhancing therapy options (pain control, psychotherapy, physiotherapy, nutrition, social rehabilitation). A total of 170 QL-reports were sent to physicians. All 38 doctors found the QL-profiles comprehensible and the therapy recommendations clinically relevant. The most common QL-problems were emotional functioning, fatigue, and arm/shoulder problems.
QL-diagnostics is a new way to individualise and to rationalise patient care. It transforms the QL-concept into a decision-relevant, integral part of a clinical path that aims to provide high quality patient care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
DEFINED_POPULATION
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
physio,pain,psychotherapy;social,nutrit.counselling&sports
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tumor Center Regensburg
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Monika KS Klinkhammer-Schalke, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Tumor Center Regensburg
Michael MK Koller, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Marburg, Institut of Theoretical Surgery
Brigitte BE Ernst, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
General Practitioner, Bad Abbach
Ferdinand FH Hofstädter, MD, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tumor Center Regensburg
Wilfried WL Lorenz, MD, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tumor Center Regensburg
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tumorzentrum Regensburg
Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Koller M, Lorenz W. Quality of life: a deconstruction for clinicians. J R Soc Med. 2002 Oct;95(10):481-8. doi: 10.1177/014107680209501002. No abstract available.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3.5/8203-1/117/02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
TUZ-QL-IP-03
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id