Radiation With Chemotherapy and a Study Drug to the Para-Aortic Nodes in Cervical Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00137358
Last Updated: 2013-01-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE1
INTERVENTIONAL
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose of external beam radiation to the para-aortic lymph nodes using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
This protocol will test the hypothesis that the use of IMRT and amifostine will decrease GI toxicity and therefore allow the radiation dose to the para-aortic lymph nodes to be safely escalated.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Radiation Therapy and Cisplatin With or Without Amifostine for Patients With Stage IIIB or IVA Cervical Cancer
NCT00012012
Radiation Therapy, Combination Chemotherapy, and Amifostine in Treating Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
NCT00003582
Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy With or Without Amifostine in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Cancer of the Nasopharynx
NCT00025298
Surgery, Radiation Therapy, and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer
NCT00003777
Paclitaxel and Radiation Therapy Plus Chemoprotection With Amifostine in Treating Patients With Stage III or Stage IV Head and Neck Cancer
NCT00003193
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Within each GTV stratum, the dose escalation will be determined as follows: Accrue 3 patients in the first dose level based on the determined stratum. A Dose Limiting Toxicity is defined as the development of \> Grade 3 acute GI toxicity, per the RTOG acute toxicity scale. If no DLT is observed at the first dose level, 3 patients will be enrolled at the next dose level. If one patient experiences DLT at a given dose level, 3 additional patients will be enrolled at that dose level. If 0 of these 3 additional patients experience DLT, dosing of the next dose level is begun. If 1 or more of these 3 additional patients experience DLT at the highest dose level below the maximally administered dose, this dose becomes the recommended dose. At least 6 patients must be entered at this recommended dose. The Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) is defined as the dose preceding that at which 2 of 6 patients experience dose limiting toxicity.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Radiation Therapy
Cisplatin
Amifostine
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients may have endoscopic resection of enlarged pelvic and low common iliac nodes, however, needle biopsy only of enlarged para-aortic nodes will be eligible for entry.
* Patients with squamous cell, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma are eligible.
* Patients must have no evidence of metastatic disease outside of the pelvis (except to the para-aortic nodes).
* Patients must have Zubrod performance status 0-1 and no medical contraindications to the administration of full dose chemotherapy.
* Patients must have a life expectancy \> 6 months
* Adequate bone marrow function: white blood cell (WBC) 3000/mm3 (absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] 1500/mm3); adequate renal function: creatinine 1.5 mg/dl (urinary diversion is permitted to improve renal function); patients must have bilirubin 1.5 mg/dl, ALT 2 x normal.
* No prior (within last 3 years) or simultaneous malignancies (other than basal cell or non-invasive tumors)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with evidence of bowel adherent to the GTV by contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan will be ineligible.
* Patients with the following histologies will be ineligible: glassy cell, small cell, carcinoid, adenoid cystic, and clear cell.
* Prior (within last 3 years) malignancies other than basal cell carcinoma or non-invasive malignancies.
* Prior chemotherapy.
* Prior pelvic or abdominal radiation (other than transvaginal irradiation to control bleeding).
* Prior tumor-directed surgery other than lymph node sampling/staging
* Life expectancy \< 6 months
* Patients who are pregnant will be ineligible.
* Patients with insulin dependent diabetes will be ineligible.
* Patients who are obese, such that reliable immobilization is not achieved.
* Patients with pain or discomfort that would preclude lying still for extended periods of time.
* Patients with tumors that are bleeding and require more immediate treatment.
19 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
MedImmune LLC
INDUSTRY
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jennifer F. De Los Santos
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jennifer F De Los Santos, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Grigsby PW, Heydon K, Mutch DG, Kim RY, Eifel P. Long-term follow-up of RTOG 92-10: cervical cancer with positive para-aortic lymph nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Nov 15;51(4):982-7. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01723-0.
Berman ML, Keys H, Creasman W, DiSaia P, Bundy B, Blessing J. Survival and patterns of recurrence in cervical cancer metastatic to periaortic lymph nodes (a Gynecologic Oncology Group study). Gynecol Oncol. 1984 Sep;19(1):8-16. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(84)90151-3.
Lepanto P, Littman P, Mikuta J, Davis L, Celebre J. Treatment of para-aortic nodes in carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer. 1975 Jun;35(6):1510-3. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197506)35:63.0.co;2-u.
Lovecchio JL, Averette HE, Donato D, Bell J. 5-year survival of patients with periaortic nodal metastases in clinical stage IB and IIA cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1989 Jul;34(1):43-5. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(89)90103-0.
Nori D, Valentine E, Hilaris BS. The role of paraaortic node irradiation in the treatment of cancer of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985 Aug;11(8):1469-73. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90334-7.
Tewfik HH, Buchsbaum HJ, Latourette HB, Lifshitz SG, Tewfik FA. Para-aortic lymph node irradiation in carcinoma of the cervix after exploratory laparotomy and biopsy-proven positive aortic nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1982 Jan;8(1):13-8. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(82)90378-9.
Grigsby PW, Perez CA, Chao KS, Herzog T, Mutch DG, Rader J. Radiation therapy for carcinoma of the cervix with biopsy-proven positive para-aortic lymph nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Mar 1;49(3):733-8. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00806-3.
Rubin SC, Brookland R, Mikuta JJ, Mangan C, Sutton G, Danoff B. Para-aortic nodal metastases in early cervical carcinoma: long-term survival following extended-field radiotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 1984 Jun;18(2):213-7. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(84)90028-3.
Carl UM, Bahnsen J, Wiegel T. Radiation therapy of para-aortic lymph nodes in cancer of the uterine cervix. Acta Oncol. 1993;32(1):63-7. doi: 10.3109/02841869309083887.
Varia MA, Bundy BN, Deppe G, Mannel R, Averette HE, Rose PG, Connelly P. Cervical carcinoma metastatic to para-aortic nodes: extended field radiation therapy with concomitant 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Dec 1;42(5):1015-23. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00267-3.
Podczaski E, Stryker JA, Kaminski P, Ndubisi B, Larson J, DeGeest K, Sorosky J, Mortel R. Extended-field radiation therapy for carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer. 1990 Jul 15;66(2):251-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900715)66:23.0.co;2-e.
Malfetano JH, Keys H. Aggressive multimodality treatment for cervical cancer with paraaortic lymph node metastases. Gynecol Oncol. 1991 Jul;42(1):44-7. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(91)90228-w.
Mutic S, Malyapa RS, Grigsby PW, Dehdashti F, Miller TR, Zoberi I, Bosch WR, Esthappan J, Low DA. PET-guided IMRT for cervical carcinoma with positive para-aortic lymph nodes-a dose-escalation treatment planning study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jan 1;55(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03804-x.
Aoki T, Nagata Y, Mizowaki T, Kokubo M, Negoro Y, Takayama K, Mitsumori M, Sasai K, Hiraoka M. Clinical evaluation of dynamic arc conformal radiotherapy for paraaortic lymph node metastasis. Radiother Oncol. 2003 Apr;67(1):113-8. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(02)00388-2.
Wadler S, Goldberg G, Fields A, Anderson P, Beitler JJ, Sood B, Haynes H, Runowicz C. The potential role of amifostine in conjunction with cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Semin Oncol. 1996 Aug;23(4 Suppl 8):64-8.
Gallardo D, Mohar A, Calderillo G, Mota A, Solorza G, Lozano A, Solano P, De La Garza J. Cisplatin, radiation, and amifostine in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1999 May;9(3):225-230. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1999.99029.x.
Koukourakis MI, Kyrias G, Kakolyris S, Kouroussis C, Frangiadaki C, Giatromanolaki A, Retalis G, Georgoulias V. Subcutaneous administration of amifostine during fractionated radiotherapy: a randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jun;18(11):2226-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.11.2226.
Athanassiou H, Antonadou D, Coliarakis N, Kouveli A, Synodinou M, Paraskevaidis M, Sarris G, Georgakopoulos GR, Panousaki K, Karageorgis P, Throuvalas N; Oncology Hellenic Group. Protective effect of amifostine during fractionated radiotherapy in patients with pelvic carcinomas: results of a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jul 15;56(4):1154-60. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00187-1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ETH175-04D
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.