Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial

NCT ID: NCT00132691

Last Updated: 2016-11-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

255 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-09-30

Study Completion Date

2010-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of standardized systemic therapy versus fluocinolone acetonide implant therapy for the treatment of severe cases of non-infectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The MUST trial is a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two treatments for patients with vision-threatening non-infectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis:

* local therapy with fluocinolone acetonide intraocular implant in affected eyes; versus
* standard therapy: systemic corticosteroid therapy supplemented, when indicated, by corticosteroid-sparing potent immuno-modulator therapy.

Study ophthalmologists, clinic coordinators, and patients will not be masked to treatment assignment. Masking will be applied to the determination of visual function at baseline, the six month visit, and thereafter . Patients will be followed until death, participant withdrawal, or a common study closeout. Patients will be seen at baseline, one month after randomization, three months after randomization, and every three months thereafter for data collection. Both ophthalmological and medical data will be collected to evaluate the outcomes of treatment of the uveitis, complications of the uveitis, and complications from therapy itself. Selected laboratory data related to the complications from systemic corticosteroid therapy will be collected.

The planned sample size of 250 patients, 125 per treatment group, is expected to give sufficient power to detect clinically important differences in visual acuity outcomes. Patients meeting the eligibility criteria detailed above will be enrolled at approximately 23 clinical centers in the United States, Australia and UK. Patients will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to one of the two treatment groups.

The MUST Research Group received additional funding at the completion of the MUST Trial to continue following patients enrolled in the study for an additional 7 years in the MUST Trial Follow-up Study (MUST FS). Since uveitis is often a chronic condition requiring long-term treatment, the objectives of the MUST FS are to evaluate outcomes of the two treatments over a longer period time. The outcomes specified for MUST FS are the same as those specified for the MUST Trial: visual acuity, ocular and systemic side effects of treatment, quality of life, and control of ocular inflammation. The primary analyses will be to compare outcomes between the original randomization groups, i.e., intention-to-treat. Secondary analyses will be based on treatment received. Study visits will be conducted every 6 months in MUST FS as opposed to every 3 months in the MUST Trial. Two analyses are planned for public release, one at 4.5 years and one after 7 years of follow-up. The Data Safety Monitoring Board reviewed and approved the analysis plan.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Uveitis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

uveitis non-infectious intermediate uveitis non-infectious posterior uveitis non-infectious panuveitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Immunosuppressant medication implant

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

fluocinolone acetonide intraocular implant

Intervention Type DRUG

RETISERT™ (fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant) 0.59 mg is a sterile implant designed to release fluocinolone acetonide locally to the posterior segment of the eye at a nominal initial rate of 0.6 μg/day, decreasing over the first month to a steady state between 0.3-0.4 μg/day over approximately 30 months.

2

Systemic corticosteroids with immunosuppressant drugs as needed

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

oral corticosteroid with immunosuppressive agents as needed

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisone

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

fluocinolone acetonide intraocular implant

RETISERT™ (fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant) 0.59 mg is a sterile implant designed to release fluocinolone acetonide locally to the posterior segment of the eye at a nominal initial rate of 0.6 μg/day, decreasing over the first month to a steady state between 0.3-0.4 μg/day over approximately 30 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

oral corticosteroid with immunosuppressive agents as needed

Prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

NDC 24208-416-01 Permitted immunosuppressive agents: - Alkylating agents cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) chlorambacil - Antimetabolities azathioprine (Imuran) azathioprine chlorambucil (Leukeran) methotrexate (Rheumatrex and others) mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcept) - T-cell inhibitors cyclosporine (Neoral, Sandimmune and other trade names) tacrolimus - Biologics infliximab daclizumab other biologics

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 13 years or older
* Best-corrected visual acuity of hand motions or better in at least one eye with uveitis
* Intraocular pressure 24 mm Hg or less in all eyes with uveitis

Exclusion Criteria

* Inadequately controlled diabetes
* Uncontrolled glaucoma
* Advanced glaucomatous optic nerve injury
* A history of scleritis; presence of an ocular toxoplasmosis scar.
* HIV infection or other immunodeficiency disease for which corticosteroid therapy would be contraindicated according to best medical judgment
Minimum Eligible Age

13 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Eye Institute (NEI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

JHSPH Center for Clinical Trials

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Douglas Jabs, MD, MBA

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

John Kempen, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Scheie Eye Center, University of Pennsylvania

Janet T Holbrook, PhD, MPH

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Director of Coordinating Cener, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Michael Altaweel, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Director of Fundus Photography Reading Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jacobs Retina Center, UCSD

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Doheny Eye Institute, USC

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Proctor Foundation, UCSF

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Anne Bates Leach Eye Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of South Florida

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Illinois at Chicago Eye Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

National Eye Institute, NIH

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts Eye Research & Surgery Institute

Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Barnes Retina Institute

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

New York Eye and Ear Infirmary

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Duke Eye Center, Duke University

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Texas Retina Associates

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Vitreoretinal Consultants

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Virginia Eye Consultants

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Royal Victoria Eye & Ear Hospital

East Melbourne, , Australia

Site Status

United Kingdom Institute of Ophthalmology

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada United States Australia United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial Research Group; Kempen JH, Altaweel MM, Holbrook JT, Jabs DA, Louis TA, Sugar EA, Thorne JE. Randomized comparison of systemic anti-inflammatory therapy versus fluocinolone acetonide implant for intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis: the multicenter uveitis steroid treatment trial. Ophthalmology. 2011 Oct;118(10):1916-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.027. Epub 2011 Aug 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21840602 (View on PubMed)

Tomkins-Netzer O, Lightman SL, Burke AE, Sugar EA, Lim LL, Jaffe GJ, Altaweel MM, Kempen JH, Holbrook JT, Jabs DA; Multicenter Steroid Treatment Trial and Follow-up Study Research Group. Seven-Year Outcomes of Uveitic Macular Edema: The Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment Trial and Follow-up Study Results. Ophthalmology. 2021 May;128(5):719-728. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.035. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32918964 (View on PubMed)

Writing Committee for the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial and Follow-up Study Research Group; Kempen JH, Altaweel MM, Holbrook JT, Sugar EA, Thorne JE, Jabs DA. Association Between Long-Lasting Intravitreous Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant vs Systemic Anti-inflammatory Therapy and Visual Acuity at 7 Years Among Patients With Intermediate, Posterior, or Panuveitis. JAMA. 2017 May 16;317(19):1993-2005. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.5103.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28477440 (View on PubMed)

Yu T, Holbrook JT, Thorne JE, Puhan MA. Using a patient-centered approach to benefit-harm assessment in treatment decision-making: a case study in uveitis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):363-71. doi: 10.1002/pds.3959. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26798977 (View on PubMed)

Yu T, Holbrook JT, Thorne JE, Flynn TN, Van Natta ML, Puhan MA. Outcome Preferences in Patients With Noninfectious Uveitis: Results of a Best-Worst Scaling Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Oct;56(11):6864-72. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-16705.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26501236 (View on PubMed)

Drye LT, Casper AS, Sternberg AL, Holbrook JT, Jenkins G, Meinert CL. The transitioning from trials to extended follow-up studies. Clin Trials. 2014 Dec;11(6):635-47. doi: 10.1177/1740774514547396. Epub 2014 Aug 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25115882 (View on PubMed)

Domalpally A, Altaweel MM, Kempen JH, Myers D, Davis JL, Foster CS, Latkany P, Srivastava SK, Stawell RJ, Holbrook JT; MUST Trial Research Group. Optical coherence tomography evaluation in the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) trial. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2012 Dec;20(6):443-7. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2012.719258. Epub 2012 Nov 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23163490 (View on PubMed)

Sen HN, Drye LT, Goldstein DA, Larson TA, Merrill PT, Pavan PR, Sheppard JD, Burke A, Srivastava SK, Jabs DA; Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial Research Group. Hypotony in patients with uveitis: The Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2012 Apr;20(2):104-12. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2011.647228.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22409563 (View on PubMed)

Frick KD, Drye LT, Kempen JH, Dunn JP, Holland GN, Latkany P, Rao NA, Sen HN, Sugar EA, Thorne JE, Wang RC, Holbrook JT; Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment-MUST Trial Research Group. Associations among visual acuity and vision- and health-related quality of life among patients in the multicenter uveitis steroid treatment trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Mar 9;53(3):1169-76. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8259. Print 2012 Mar.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22247489 (View on PubMed)

Sugar EA, Jabs DA, Altaweel MM, Lightman S, Acharya N, Vitale AT, Thorne JE; Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial Research Group. Identifying a clinically meaningful threshold for change in uveitic macular edema evaluated by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec;152(6):1044-1052.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.05.028. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21861971 (View on PubMed)

Madow B, Galor A, Feuer WJ, Altaweel MM, Davis JL. Validation of a photographic vitreous haze grading technique for clinical trials in uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;152(2):170-176.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.058. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21652026 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCT00269698

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

U10EY014660

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

1U10EY014660-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ISRCTN15396562

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NEI-106

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id