Effect of Sulodexide in Overt Diabetic Nephropathy

NCT ID: NCT00130312

Last Updated: 2021-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

968 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-08-31

Study Completion Date

2008-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether sulodexide is effective in slowing or preventing the progression of diabetic kidney disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diabetes is now the most common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the U.S. and in many other developed nations. Diabetic nephropathy now represents 44% of all new cases of ESRD in the U.S. Despite advances in clinical care, including improvements in glycemic and blood pressure control, the number of new cases of diabetes related ESRD continues to rise. In particular, the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2)-related cases of ESRD is rapidly increasing. From 1993 to 1997, 71% of all diabetes-related ESRD was attributable to DM2 (USRDS 1999). The earliest sign of diabetic kidney disease presents as microalbuminuria, the spilling of small of amounts of blood protein into the urine. Microalbuminuria correlates directly with the subsequent development of more advanced kidney disease. Improved glycemic control and blood pressure control with the use of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system can reduce the level of microalbuminuria and overt proteinuria. However, despite these measures, diabetic nephropathy continues to progress, albeit more slowly. Sulodexide belongs to a class of drugs called glycosaminoglycans (GAG). GAG therapy has been shown in animal models to prevent and or induce regression of albuminuria, and the morphologic changes associated with progressive diabetic nephropathy such as glomerular basement thickening, loss of the anionic charge density and mesangial collagen deposition. Sulodexide is approved in Europe to treat vascular indications. It has been utilized in several small phase II studies to treat early diabetic nephropathy, inducing an additional 40-70 % reduction in albuminuria in subjects whose albumin excretion was already reduced with tight glycemic control plus the use of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system for blood pressure control.

The purpose of this study is to add to this body of evidence that Sulodexide may offer additional benefit in preventing or ameliorating more advanced diabetic nephropathy manifested as overt proteinuria and reduced GFR. Subjects with type 2 diabetes, moderately elevated serum creatinine and overt proteinuria will be treated with a standardized maximal recommended/tolerated dose of irbesartan 300 mg/day or losartan 100 mg/day plus additional concomitant non-ARB, non-ACEi antihypertensive drugs,for up to 2-3 months to establish adequate and stable blood pressure control and urine protein excretion. After establishing baseline serum creatinine and urine protein excretion they will be randomized to either Sulodexide 200 mg/d or matching placebo. Subjects will be seen every 3 months to monitor safety and efficacy parameters for up to 4 years. The primary outcome is a doubling of baseline serum creatinine (50% loss of kidney function) or end stage kidney disease (ESRD).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Nephropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sulodexide

Also known as KRX-101. These patients are also on ACEs and ARBs (irbesartin and/or losartan).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sulodexide

Intervention Type DRUG

100 mg gelcap in the morning and evening

Placebo

These patients are also on ACEs and ARBs (irbesartin and/or losartan).

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

1 placebo gelcap in the morning and evening

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sulodexide

100 mg gelcap in the morning and evening

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

1 placebo gelcap in the morning and evening

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

KRX-101 placebo gelpcap

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes;
* Urine protein to creatinine ratio (PCR) equal to or greater than 900 mg/G (101.7 mg/mmol) in women and equal to or greater than 650 mg/G (73.45 mg/mmol) in men;
* Serum creatinine in women 1.3 - 3.0 mg/dL (115-265 μmol/L), inclusive, and in men 1.5 - 3.0 mg/dL (133-265 μmol/L), inclusive;
* Willing to discontinue antihypertensive medication regimen, if applicable;
* Willing and able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Type 1 (insulin-dependent; juvenile onset) diabetes;
* Renal disease as follows:

* Patients with known non-diabetic renal disease (nephrosclerosis superimposed on diabetic nephropathy acceptable), or
* Renal allograft;
* Absolute requirement for combination therapy of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB);
* Patients who require ACEI, but not ACEI/ARB combination;
* Cardiovascular disease as follows:

* Unstable angina pectoris within 3 months of study entry;
* Myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/stent within 3 months of study entry;
* Transient ischemic attack within 3 months of study entry;
* Cerebrovascular accident within 3 months of study entry;
* New York Heart Association Functional Class III or IV (Note: if a patient is New York Heart Association Functional Class I or II and requires an ACEI, consult with the Clinical Coordinating Center to obtain permission for the patient to be on an ACEI rather than an ARB);
* Obstructive valvular heart disease or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; or
* Second or third degree atrioventricular block not successfully treated with a pacemaker;
* Need for chronic (\>2 weeks) immunosuppressive therapy, including corticosteroids (excluding inhaled or nasal steroids);
* New diagnosis of cancer or recurrent cancer within 5 years of screening (except non-melanoma skin cancer);
* Psychiatric disorder that interferes with the patient's ability to comply with the protocol;
* Inability to tolerate oral medication or a history of significant malabsorption;
* History of alcohol or other drug abuse within 12 months of study entry;
* Known human immunodeficiency virus disease;
* Any other medical condition which renders the patient unable to or unlikely to complete the study, or which would interfere with optimal participation in the study or produce significant risk to the patient;
* Receipt of any investigational drugs (including placebo) within 30 days of enrollment;
* Evidence of hepatic dysfunction including total bilirubin \>2.0 mg/dL (\>35 micromol/L) or liver transaminase (aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\] or alanine transferase \[ALT\]) \>3 times upper limit of normal;
* Anticipate need for surgery;
* Inability to cooperate with study personnel or history of noncompliance to medical regimen;
* Known allergies or intolerance to any heparin-like compound including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Type II;
* Prior exposure to sulodexide, either in a clinical setting or as a participant in another clinical study.
* Untreated urinary tract infection that would impact urinary protein values.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Collaborative Study Group (CSG)

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

Keryx Biopharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Edmund J Lewis, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

The Collaborative Study Group, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL USA

Robert C Atkins, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Collaborative Study Group, Monash Medical Center, Clayton, Victoria, AUSTRALIA

Dick deZeeuw, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Collaborative Study Group, University of Groningen, NETHERLANDS

Itamar Raz, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Collaborative Study Group, Hadassah University, Jerusalem, ISRAEL

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Collaborative Study Group, Clinical Coordinating Center for U.S. and Canadian clinics, Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

The Collaborative Study Group, Clinical Coordinating Center for the Pacific Region, Monash Medical Center

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

The Collaborative Study Group, Clinical Coordinating Center for European Clinics, University of Groningen

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bidadkosh A, Lambooy SPH, Heerspink HJ, Pena MJ, Henning RH, Buikema H, Deelman LE. Predictive Properties of Biomarkers GDF-15, NTproBNP, and hs-TnT for Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes With Nephropathy. Diabetes Care. 2017 Jun;40(6):784-792. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2175. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28341782 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KRX-101-401

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT00342238

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

SGLT2 Inhibition in Hemodialysis
NCT05179668 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2
SER150 vs Placebo in Diabetic Kidney Disease
NCT04881123 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3