Trial Outcomes & Findings for Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide (AC) Followed by Weekly Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer Patients (NCT NCT00129376)

NCT ID: NCT00129376

Last Updated: 2019-07-05

Results Overview

Pathological complete response was defined by the Miller \& Payne criteria. pCR was defined as no invasive cells identifiable in breast sections at surgery. Response was measured by physical exam and breast imaging before surgery and was evaluated according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Pathological response after surgery, was based on the proportion of remaining tumor and postchemotherapy changes, evaluating separately the response in the breast and in the axilla lymph nodes.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

63 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Up to 29 weeks

Results posted on

2019-07-05

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed Docetaxel
Patients received doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both in a short intravenous infusion, every three weeks for four cycles (days 1, 22, 43 and 64). Three weeks later, docetaxel (36 mg/m2) was administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion, weekly for six weeks (days 85, 92, 99, 106, 113 and 120) followed by a 2-week resting period (8-week cycle). After that, patients received a second docetaxel cycle (infusions on days 141, 148, 155, 162, 169 and 176).
Overall Study
STARTED
63
Overall Study
COMPLETED
61
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed Docetaxel
Patients received doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both in a short intravenous infusion, every three weeks for four cycles (days 1, 22, 43 and 64). Three weeks later, docetaxel (36 mg/m2) was administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion, weekly for six weeks (days 85, 92, 99, 106, 113 and 120) followed by a 2-week resting period (8-week cycle). After that, patients received a second docetaxel cycle (infusions on days 141, 148, 155, 162, 169 and 176).
Overall Study
Adverse Event
1
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
1

Baseline Characteristics

Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide (AC) Followed by Weekly Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer Patients

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed Docetaxel
n=63 Participants
Patients received doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both in a short intravenous infusion, every three weeks for four cycles (days 1, 22, 43 and 64). Three weeks later, docetaxel (36 mg/m2) was administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion, weekly for six weeks (days 85, 92, 99, 106, 113 and 120) followed by a 2-week resting period (8-week cycle). After that, patients received a second docetaxel cycle (infusions on days 141, 148, 155, 162, 169 and 176).
Age, Continuous
48.43 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
63 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
63 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
63 participants
n=5 Participants
Menopausal status
Premenopausal
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
Menopausal status
Postmenopausal
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
Median Tumor size, cm
4.8 cm
n=5 Participants
Disease stage (I, IIA, IIB y IIIA)
I
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease stage (I, IIA, IIB y IIIA)
IIA
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease stage (I, IIA, IIB y IIIA)
IIB
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease stage (I, IIA, IIB y IIIA)
IIIA
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Hormonal receptors (Estrogen Receptor [ER]+/ Progesterone Receptor [PR]+, ER+/PR-, ER-/PR+, ER-/PR-)
ER+/PR+
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
Hormonal receptors (Estrogen Receptor [ER]+/ Progesterone Receptor [PR]+, ER+/PR-, ER-/PR+, ER-/PR-)
ER+/PR-
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
Hormonal receptors (Estrogen Receptor [ER]+/ Progesterone Receptor [PR]+, ER+/PR-, ER-/PR+, ER-/PR-)
ER-/PR+
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Hormonal receptors (Estrogen Receptor [ER]+/ Progesterone Receptor [PR]+, ER+/PR-, ER-/PR+, ER-/PR-)
ER-/PR-
10 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 29 weeks

Population: 2 patients did not received surgery, 1 because of disease progression, and 1 due to inacceptable toxicity.

Pathological complete response was defined by the Miller \& Payne criteria. pCR was defined as no invasive cells identifiable in breast sections at surgery. Response was measured by physical exam and breast imaging before surgery and was evaluated according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Pathological response after surgery, was based on the proportion of remaining tumor and postchemotherapy changes, evaluating separately the response in the breast and in the axilla lymph nodes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed Docetaxel
n=61 Participants
Patients received doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both in a short intravenous infusion, every three weeks for four cycles (days 1, 22, 43 and 64). Three weeks later, docetaxel (36 mg/m2) was administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion, weekly for six weeks (days 85, 92, 99, 106, 113 and 120) followed by a 2-week resting period (8-week cycle). After that, patients received a second docetaxel cycle (infusions on days 141, 148, 155, 162, 169 and 176).
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate
11 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 29 weeks

CRR measured according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions, where: * Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions * Partial Response (PR): \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions * Progresive Disease (PD): \>=20% increase from smallest sum of longest diameter recorded since treatment started (best response). * Stable Disease (SD): Neither PD nor PR

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed Docetaxel
n=63 Participants
Patients received doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both in a short intravenous infusion, every three weeks for four cycles (days 1, 22, 43 and 64). Three weeks later, docetaxel (36 mg/m2) was administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion, weekly for six weeks (days 85, 92, 99, 106, 113 and 120) followed by a 2-week resting period (8-week cycle). After that, patients received a second docetaxel cycle (infusions on days 141, 148, 155, 162, 169 and 176).
Clinical Response Rate (CRR)
Complete response
29 Participants
Clinical Response Rate (CRR)
Partial response
28 Participants
Clinical Response Rate (CRR)
Stable Disease
5 Participants
Clinical Response Rate (CRR)
Unknown
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 29 weeks

Population: 20 patient tumor sample could not be evaluated

Paraffin-embedded tumors were processed with standard immunocytochemical techniques. Over-expression of Topo II was defined as \>10% cells with nuclear staining.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed Docetaxel
n=41 Participants
Patients received doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both in a short intravenous infusion, every three weeks for four cycles (days 1, 22, 43 and 64). Three weeks later, docetaxel (36 mg/m2) was administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion, weekly for six weeks (days 85, 92, 99, 106, 113 and 120) followed by a 2-week resting period (8-week cycle). After that, patients received a second docetaxel cycle (infusions on days 141, 148, 155, 162, 169 and 176).
Number of Participants With Over-expression of Topo II (>10% Cells With Nuclear Staining)
> 10%
20 Participants
Number of Participants With Over-expression of Topo II (>10% Cells With Nuclear Staining)
< 10%
21 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 29 weeks

Population: 17 patient tumor sample could not be evaluated

Paraffin-embedded tumors were processed with standard immunocytochemical techniques. Tumors with more than 1% of cells with nuclear staining were considered to be over-expressing this protein.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed Docetaxel
n=44 Participants
Patients received doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both in a short intravenous infusion, every three weeks for four cycles (days 1, 22, 43 and 64). Three weeks later, docetaxel (36 mg/m2) was administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion, weekly for six weeks (days 85, 92, 99, 106, 113 and 120) followed by a 2-week resting period (8-week cycle). After that, patients received a second docetaxel cycle (infusions on days 141, 148, 155, 162, 169 and 176).
Number of Participants With Over-expression of Survivin (>1% Cells With Nuclear Staining)
> 1 %
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Over-expression of Survivin (>1% Cells With Nuclear Staining)
< 1%
26 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 29 weeks

Population: 20 patient tumor sample could not be evaluated

Paraffin-embedded tumors were processed with standard immunocytochemical techniques. Sections were rated according to the percentage of tumor cells nuclei with positive staining (1 = \< 25%; 2 = between 25-75% and 3 = \> 75%).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed Docetaxel
n=41 Participants
Patients received doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both in a short intravenous infusion, every three weeks for four cycles (days 1, 22, 43 and 64). Three weeks later, docetaxel (36 mg/m2) was administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion, weekly for six weeks (days 85, 92, 99, 106, 113 and 120) followed by a 2-week resting period (8-week cycle). After that, patients received a second docetaxel cycle (infusions on days 141, 148, 155, 162, 169 and 176).
Number of Participants With Over-expression of p27 (>75% Cells With Nuclear Staining)
< 75%
24 Participants
Number of Participants With Over-expression of p27 (>75% Cells With Nuclear Staining)
> 75%
17 Participants

Adverse Events

Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed Docetaxel

Serious events: 12 serious events
Other events: 63 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed Docetaxel
n=63 participants at risk
Patients received doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both in a short intravenous infusion, every three weeks for four cycles (days 1, 22, 43 and 64). Three weeks later, docetaxel (36 mg/m2) was administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion, weekly for six weeks (days 85, 92, 99, 106, 113 and 120) followed by a 2-week resting period (8-week cycle). After that, patients received a second docetaxel cycle (infusions on days 141, 148, 155, 162, 169 and 176).
Infections and infestations
Acute Pharyngitis
1.6%
1/63 • Number of events 1 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
6.3%
4/63 • Number of events 4 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
1.6%
1/63 • Number of events 1 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Infections and infestations
Infection
4.8%
3/63 • Number of events 3 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis/pulmonary infiltrates
1.6%
1/63 • Number of events 1 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
1.6%
1/63 • Number of events 1 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Cardiac disorders
Congestive heart failure
1.6%
1/63 • Number of events 1 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac-ischemia/infarction
1.6%
1/63 • Number of events 1 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed Docetaxel
n=63 participants at risk
Patients received doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), both in a short intravenous infusion, every three weeks for four cycles (days 1, 22, 43 and 64). Three weeks later, docetaxel (36 mg/m2) was administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion, weekly for six weeks (days 85, 92, 99, 106, 113 and 120) followed by a 2-week resting period (8-week cycle). After that, patients received a second docetaxel cycle (infusions on days 141, 148, 155, 162, 169 and 176).
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
4.8%
3/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
7.9%
5/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
41.3%
26/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
15.9%
10/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Nervous system disorders
Anxiety
1.6%
1/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Cardiac disorders
Congestive heart failure
1.6%
1/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
1.6%
1/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
1.6%
1/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
3.2%
2/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Cardiac disorders
Edema
1.6%
1/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
General disorders
Asthenia
7.9%
5/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic dysfunction
3.2%
2/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Infections and infestations
Infection without neutropenia
1.6%
1/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
3.2%
2/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
1.6%
1/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
7.9%
5/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks
General disorders
Weight loss
1.6%
1/63 • Through study treatment up to surgery, an average of 26 weeks

Additional Information

Scientific Director / Medical Lead / Project Manager

Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group

Phone: +34916592870

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: LTE60