Trial Outcomes & Findings for Web-Enhanced Guideline Implementation for Post MI CBOC Patients (NCT NCT00126750)
NCT ID: NCT00126750
Last Updated: 2015-07-23
Results Overview
The investigators used an intent-to-treat approach for our main analysis, basing our outcome measures on provider's eligible patient population in each of the clinics. Performance improvement was calculated at the change (before vs after the intervention) the percentage of provider's patients with each clinical indicator. 1) change in the percentage of patients with improvements in LDL. Improvement defined as LDL-C level \< previous 18 mos; 2) Change in the percentage of patients with improvements in A1c. Improvement defined as HbA1c level \< previous 18 mos; 3) Change in percentage of patients prescribed Beta Blockers; 4) Change in the percentage of patients prescribed Statins; 5) Change in the percentage of patients prescribed ACEI or ARB; 6) Change in percentage of patients reaching target goal for LDL-C (\<100mg/dL); 7) Change in percentage of patients reaching target goal for HbA1c (\<8%).
COMPLETED
NA
847 participants
1/1/02 - 12/31/08
2015-07-23
Participant Flow
Among 66 eligible medical centers, the investigators recruited 48 affiliated with 219 clinics, including 957 providers in 26 states, the VIrgin Islands, and Puerto Rico; of these, 168 clinics were randomized (ie, had \>1 provider enroll)
Clinics were randomized when first eligible provider at that clinic logged on to the Web site.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Intervention Group
The intervention included a multicomponent Web site and pushed e-mail cues with educational content.
|
Control Group
Providers in control clinics were sent a link to an existing VA Web site that contained links to a wide range of clinical guidelines for various medical conditions.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
385
|
462
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
205
|
196
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
180
|
266
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Web-Enhanced Guideline Implementation for Post MI CBOC Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Intervention Arm/Group
n=385 Participants
Providers from eligible clinics that were allocated to the intervention arm.
|
Control Arm/Group
n=462 Participants
Providers from eligible clinics that were allocated to the control arm.
|
Total
n=847 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 (NUMBER)
n=5 Participants
|
0 (NUMBER)
n=7 Participants
|
0 (NUMBER)
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 (NUMBER)
n=5 Participants
|
0 (NUMBER)
n=7 Participants
|
0 (NUMBER)
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 (NUMBER)
n=5 Participants
|
0 (NUMBER)
n=7 Participants
|
0 (NUMBER)
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender
|
0 (NUMBER)
n=5 Participants
|
0 (NUMBER)
n=7 Participants
|
0 (NUMBER)
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1/1/02 - 12/31/08The investigators used an intent-to-treat approach for our main analysis, basing our outcome measures on provider's eligible patient population in each of the clinics. Performance improvement was calculated at the change (before vs after the intervention) the percentage of provider's patients with each clinical indicator. 1) change in the percentage of patients with improvements in LDL. Improvement defined as LDL-C level \< previous 18 mos; 2) Change in the percentage of patients with improvements in A1c. Improvement defined as HbA1c level \< previous 18 mos; 3) Change in percentage of patients prescribed Beta Blockers; 4) Change in the percentage of patients prescribed Statins; 5) Change in the percentage of patients prescribed ACEI or ARB; 6) Change in percentage of patients reaching target goal for LDL-C (\<100mg/dL); 7) Change in percentage of patients reaching target goal for HbA1c (\<8%).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention
n=385 Participants
Intervention Providers received an interactive, educational website and motivational reminders.
|
Control
n=462 Participants
Control Providers received a link to VA practice guidelines.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Outcome Was the Performance of Each Provider on Each of Seven Clinical Indicators
Change in % of patients w/ improvement in LDL
|
2.8 percentage of provider's patients
|
2.1 percentage of provider's patients
|
|
Primary Outcome Was the Performance of Each Provider on Each of Seven Clinical Indicators
Change in % of patients w/ improvement in HbA1c
|
11.5 percentage of provider's patients
|
9.5 percentage of provider's patients
|
|
Primary Outcome Was the Performance of Each Provider on Each of Seven Clinical Indicators
Change in % of patients prescribed B-Blockers
|
15.5 percentage of provider's patients
|
12.1 percentage of provider's patients
|
|
Primary Outcome Was the Performance of Each Provider on Each of Seven Clinical Indicators
Change in % patients prescribed Statins
|
8.5 percentage of provider's patients
|
7.5 percentage of provider's patients
|
|
Primary Outcome Was the Performance of Each Provider on Each of Seven Clinical Indicators
Change in % of patients prescribed ACEI or ARB
|
4.9 percentage of provider's patients
|
2.9 percentage of provider's patients
|
|
Primary Outcome Was the Performance of Each Provider on Each of Seven Clinical Indicators
Change in % of patients reaching target LDL
|
19.9 percentage of provider's patients
|
15.2 percentage of provider's patients
|
|
Primary Outcome Was the Performance of Each Provider on Each of Seven Clinical Indicators
Change in % of patients reaching target HbA1c
|
6 percentage of provider's patients
|
.7 percentage of provider's patients
|
Adverse Events
Intervention Group
Control Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place