Internally Versus Externally Guided Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Training (BWSTT) for Locomotor Recovery Post-stroke

NCT ID: NCT00125619

Last Updated: 2017-02-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-09-30

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overriding goal of this proposal is to identify the critical physiological and biomechanical effects of BWSTT for promoting improved locomotor function in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this pilot study, we tested two forms of locomotor training for gait rehabilitation in persons post-stroke: traditional locomotor training (partial body-weight support and manual assistance of therapists) vs. robotic-assisted locomotor training (partial body-weight support and robotic guidance with the Lokomat). We enrolled 16 persons with chronic (\>6 months) hemiparesis post-stroke who were randomized to traditional/manual or robotic locomotor training. All individuals received 12 sessions (thrice weekly for four weeks) of training. Each session involved 30 minutes of stepping.

The complete study results are published.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1: Therapist assisted

Therapist assisted locomotor training (partial body-weight supported)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Locomotor training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This study compares two forms of Iocomotor training: 1) standard or manual - in which an individual is provided partial body weight support while walking on a treadmill with assistance of 1-3 therapists to move the legs and stabilize the trunk/pelvis and 2) robotic-guided - in which an exoskeleton robot (Lokomat) guides movement of the walking pattern. Partial body-weight support, treadmill walking and treadmill speed are consistent between the study arms.

Arm 2: Robot-assisted

Robot-assisted locomotor training (partial body-weight supported)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Locomotor training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This study compares two forms of Iocomotor training: 1) standard or manual - in which an individual is provided partial body weight support while walking on a treadmill with assistance of 1-3 therapists to move the legs and stabilize the trunk/pelvis and 2) robotic-guided - in which an exoskeleton robot (Lokomat) guides movement of the walking pattern. Partial body-weight support, treadmill walking and treadmill speed are consistent between the study arms.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Locomotor training

This study compares two forms of Iocomotor training: 1) standard or manual - in which an individual is provided partial body weight support while walking on a treadmill with assistance of 1-3 therapists to move the legs and stabilize the trunk/pelvis and 2) robotic-guided - in which an exoskeleton robot (Lokomat) guides movement of the walking pattern. Partial body-weight support, treadmill walking and treadmill speed are consistent between the study arms.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

partial body-weight supported treadmill training, body-weight supported treadmill training

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident
* Single event
* Unilateral hemiplegia
* Locomotor disability
* Ability to walk independently 25' on level ground (may use an assistive device \[cane or walker\]; may NOT use a brace)
* Cognitive ability to follow 3-step commands

Exclusion Criteria

* Unstable or uncontrolled blood pressure
* Uncontrolled seizures
* Severe cognitive impairment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carolynn Patten, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Westlake KP, Patten C. Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post-stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009 Jun 12;6:18. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19523207 (View on PubMed)

Spiess MR, Jaramillo JP, Behrman AL, Teraoka JK, Patten C. Unexpected recovery after robotic locomotor training at physiologic stepping speed: a single-case design. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Aug;93(8):1476-84. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.02.030. Epub 2012 Mar 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22446153 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B4032-I

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Power Training Post-stroke
NCT01970592 COMPLETED PHASE2
Strength Training and Stroke
NCT00629005 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Combined Cognitive and Gait Training
NCT02362282 TERMINATED NA