A Culturally Sensitive Values-Guided Aid for End of Life Decision-Making
NCT ID: NCT00122135
Last Updated: 2015-12-14
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-12-31
2009-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objectives: The explicit identification of values that guide medical decision-making could improve the decision-making process for end-of-life care for patients of all races/ethnicities. 1) We will directly compare, critically assess, and revise two Values Histories on the basis of qualitative data derived from individual interviews with racially/ethnically diverse patients and surrogates, and explore patients', surrogates', and physicians' values, preferences and concerns that guide decision-making about medical interventions at the end-of-life. 2) We will then adapt the existing Values Histories into a clinically practical tool, the Values Inventory discussion aid. 3) We will conduct preliminary testing of this tool to be used in physician-patient or physician-surrogate encounters to improve and facilitate decisions about end-of-life care.
Methods: To complete Objective 3 we will conduct a pilot randomized trial of the developed Values Inventory discussion aid to test the feasibility of using it in clinical practice. This clinicaltrials.gov number applies to Objective 3 of IIR-02-224 only (as the complete study is a mixed-methods study with several different arms and enrollment goals). Eligible patients are at risk for 6-12-month mortality with one of the following diagnoses: congestive heart failure, with ejection fraction of less than 25%; severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/emphysema with dependence on oxygen; chronic liver disease with cirrhosis and ascites; colon carcinoma with liver metastases; or non-small cell cancer of the lung, stage III or IV, and patients with chronic kidney disease on renal replacement therapy, with previous hospitalization. All (patient) participants are age 55 years or older and are recruited through the clinics/wards at the Houston VAMC. Surrogates are surrogates of patients with such conditions; physicians are generalists and medical subspecialists. All participants are African American, Hispanic, or White, reflecting the 3 major races/ethnicities at the Houston VAMC.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients without Values Inventory (VI)
Clinic encounter w/physician \& patient and/or surrogate - Patients who did not receive the VI prior to their physician clinic encounter
No interventions assigned to this group
Patients with Values Inventory (VI)
Clinic encounter w/physician \& patient and/or surrogate - Patients who completed the VI prior to their physician clinic encounter
Values Inventory (VI)
The Values Inventory was given to patients for self-administration while they were awaiting their clinic appointment. They were instructed to bring it to their physician's attention right at the beginning of their clinic visit.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Values Inventory (VI)
The Values Inventory was given to patients for self-administration while they were awaiting their clinic appointment. They were instructed to bring it to their physician's attention right at the beginning of their clinic visit.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* congestive heart failure, with ejection fraction of \<25%;
* severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/emphysema with dependence on oxygen;
* chronic liver disease with cirrhosis and ascites;
* colon carcinoma with liver metastases; or
* non-small cell cancer of the lung, stage III or IV
* chronic kidney disease on renal replacement therapy, with previous hospitalization
* All participants will be age 55 years or older and will be recruited through the clinics at the Houston VAMC.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients less than 55 years old
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baylor College of Medicine
OTHER
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ursula K. Braun, MD MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Braun UK, Beyth RJ, Ford ME, McCullough LB. Defining limits in care of terminally ill patients. BMJ. 2007 Feb 3;334(7587):239-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39048.475046.68.
Braun UK, Beyth RJ, Ford ME, McCullough LB. Voices of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogates on the burdens of end-of-life decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Mar;23(3):267-74. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0487-7. Epub 2008 Jan 3.
Braun UK, Kunik ME, Pham C. Treating depression in terminally ill patients can optimize their physical comfort at the end of life and provide them the opportunity to confront and prepare for death. Geriatrics. 2008 Jun;63(6):25-7.
Braun UK, McCullough LB, Beyth RJ, Wray NP, Kunik ME, Morgan RO. Racial and ethnic differences in the treatment of seriously ill patients: a comparison of African-American, Caucasian and Hispanic veterans. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008 Sep;100(9):1041-51. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31442-5.
Braun UK, Naik AD, McCullough LB. Reconceptualizing the experience of surrogate decision making: reports vs genuine decisions. Ann Fam Med. 2009 May-Jun;7(3):249-53. doi: 10.1370/afm.963.
Braun UK, Ford ME, Beyth RJ, McCullough LB. The physician's professional role in end-of-life decision-making: voices of racially and ethnically diverse physicians. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.018. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
Braun UK, Ford ME, McCullough L, Beyth RJ. Discussing End-of-Life Decision Making: Views of Racially and Ethnically Diverse Physicians. [Abstract]. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging. 2006 Aug 1; 10(4):332.
Nambiar A, McCullough L, Ford M, Beyth R, Braun UK. Discussing End-of-Life Decision Making: Views of Racially and Ethnically Diverse Physicians. [Abstract]. The Gerontologist. 2006 Oct 1; 46(Special Issue 1):402.
Braun U, Morgan RO, Ford ME, Beyth RJ. Who gets what? Race/ethnicity matter for treatment of seriously ill veterans. [Abstract]. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2006 Apr 1; 54(S4):S180.
Braun U, McCullough L, Ford M, Espadas D, Beyth R. End-of-life care across race and ethnicities: Voices of patients, surrogates, and physicians. [Abstract]. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2005 Apr 1; 53(s1):S137-8.
Pham C, Braun UK. Racial and Ethnic Differences in End-of-Life Care for Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease. [Abstract]. Journal of pain and symptom management. 2009 Mar 1; 37(3):556-557.
Braun UK, Beyth RJ, Ford ME, Espadas D, McCullough LB. Decision-making styles of seriously ill male Veterans for end-of-life care: Autonomists, Altruists, Authorizers, Absolute Trusters, and Avoiders. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Mar;94(3):334-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
Braun UK, McCullough LB. Preventing life-sustaining treatment by default. Ann Fam Med. 2011 May-Jun;9(3):250-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1227.
Menon S, McCullough LB, Beyth RJ, Ford ME, Espadas D, Braun UK. Feasibility of Using a Values Inventory as a Discussion Aid about End-of-Life Care. Poster session presented at: Gerontological Society of America Annual Scientific Meeting; 2010 Nov 21; New Orleans, LA.
Menon S, McCullough LB, Beyth RJ, Ford ME, Espadas D, Braun UK. Use of a values inventory as a discussion aid about end-of-life care: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Palliat Support Care. 2016 Aug;14(4):330-40. doi: 10.1017/S1478951515001091. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IIR 02-224
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id