Expanding and Testing VA Collaborative Care Models for Depression
NCT ID: NCT00119028
Last Updated: 2012-04-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-04-30
2009-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Implementing Telemedicine-Based Collaborative Care for MDD in Contract CBOCs
NCT00317018
Effectiveness of Team Treatment of Depression in Primary Care
NCT00012766
Therapist-Guided Smartphone-Delivered CBT for MDD
NCT05386329
Reaching Out to Adolescents With Depression
NCT01140464
TEAM Study to Improve Depression Care in Rural CBOCs
NCT00105690
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Based on the published evidence, collaborative care for depression is both necessary and sufficient for improving care and outcomes for depressed patients in primary care settings. The Translating Initiatives in Depression into Effective Solutions (TIDES) project, upon which ReTIDES is based, developed a VA-adapted version of collaborative care through input from veterans, clinicians, and managers. The initial TIDES project resulted in a clinically stable and effective model as tested in seven primary care practices in three VISNs. This positive result provided the basis for spreading and sustaining the TIDES model and initiating the study of national implementation strategies and issues.
Objectives:
The objective of this grant was to carry out preparatory steps toward national implementation, including developing and investigating TIDES sustainability and partnering and marketing strategies. The project supported VISNs as learning organizations in the area of depression care improvement, and ultimately aimed to support as many as 8% to 10% of veterans nationally in improving their health and quality of life. Preparatory steps included 1) development of easily disseminated tools, including CPRS decision support, panel monitoring, and care manager and team training materials, 2) national and local dissemination to support TIDES model sustainability and spread and 3) evaluation using tools that would assess not only the success of this project, but could be used for quality monitoring during roll-out.
Methods:
Tools: We used the Chronic Illness Care model and Evidence Based Quality Improvement methods to develop tools for disseminating TIDES to additional medical centers and practices in 3 TIDES VISNs and two medical centers (with 10 practices) in one additional VISN. These tools were then used for national implementation. Dissemination: We served as technical expert consultants by 1) carrying out national and regional training; 2) linking to national patient care services, employee education, and information technology methods and priorities; and 3) supporting evidence-based quality improvement in new sites.We organized these efforts through a national dissemination plan.
Evaluation: We developed and applied 1) formative evaluation tools; 2) fine-tuned performance measure tools based on electronic data, and applied in a non-randomized quasi-experimental design (untreated control group with pretest and posttest); 3) a web-based survey for primary care clinicians and 4) an innovative implementation cost assessment approach. We also used 5) qualitative information on the process of dissemination , including links to national resources and 6) a randomized design to evaluate long term (18-month) cost effectiveness of TIDES.
Status:
Completed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1
Non-experimental QI intervention - No comparator
Depression Care Quality Improvement Implementation
We will used a randomized design to evaluate long term (18-month) cost effectiveness of TIDES collaborative care in six intervention clinics with fully-implemented collaborative care compared to three matched and randomly-assigned usual care clinics. We used a non-randomized quasiexperimental design (untreated control group with pretest and posttest) to measure impacts on clinician performance, knowledge, and attitudes in 6 newly-implemented collaborative care intervention clinics compared to 6 matched usual care clinics
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Depression Care Quality Improvement Implementation
We will used a randomized design to evaluate long term (18-month) cost effectiveness of TIDES collaborative care in six intervention clinics with fully-implemented collaborative care compared to three matched and randomly-assigned usual care clinics. We used a non-randomized quasiexperimental design (untreated control group with pretest and posttest) to measure impacts on clinician performance, knowledge, and attitudes in 6 newly-implemented collaborative care intervention clinics compared to 6 matched usual care clinics
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
US Department of Veterans Affairs
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lisa V. Rubenstein, MD MSPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Long Beach
Long Beach, California, United States
VA Medical Center
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
VA Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
St. Cloud VA Medical Center
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, United States
VA Medical Center, Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rubenstein LV, Meredith LS, Parker LE, Gordon NP, Hickey SC, Oken C, Lee ML. Impacts of evidence-based quality improvement on depression in primary care: a randomized experiment. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Oct;21(10):1027-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00549.x. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
Sherman SE, Fotiades J, Rubenstein LV, Gilman SC, Vivell S, Chaney E, Yano EM, Felker B. Teaching systems-based practice to primary care physicians to foster routine implementation of evidence-based depression care. Acad Med. 2007 Feb;82(2):168-75. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31802d9165.
Fickel JJ, Parker LE, Yano EM, Kirchner JE. Primary care - mental health collaboration: an example of assessing usual practice and potential barriers. J Interprof Care. 2007 Mar;21(2):207-16. doi: 10.1080/13561820601132827.
Campbell DG, Felker BL, Liu CF, Yano EM, Kirchner JE, Chan D, Rubenstein LV, Chaney EF. Prevalence of depression-PTSD comorbidity: implications for clinical practice guidelines and primary care-based interventions. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jun;22(6):711-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0101-4.
Chaney E, Rabuck LG, Uman J, Mittman DC, Simons C, Simon BF, Ritchie M, Cody M, Rubenstein LV. Human subjects protection issues in QUERI implementation research: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008 Feb 15;3:10. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-10.
Liu CF, Rubenstein LV, Kirchner JE, Fortney JC, Perkins MW, Ober SK, Pyne JM, Chaney EF. Organizational cost of quality improvement for depression care. Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb;44(1):225-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00911.x.
Liu CF, Bolkan C, Chan D, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV, Chaney EF. Dual use of VA and non-VA services among primary care patients with depression. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Mar;24(3):305-11. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0867-7. Epub 2008 Dec 20.
Smith JL, Williams JW Jr, Owen RR, Rubenstein LV, Chaney E. Developing a national dissemination plan for collaborative care for depression: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008 Dec 31;3:59. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-59.
Fickel JJ, Yano EM, Parker LE, Rubenstein LV. Clinic-level process of care for depression in primary care settings. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009 Mar;36(2):144-58. doi: 10.1007/s10488-009-0207-1. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
Luck J, Hagigi F, Parker LE, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV, Kirchner JE. A social marketing approach to implementing evidence-based practice in VHA QUERI: the TIDES depression collaborative care model. Implement Sci. 2009 Sep 28;4:64. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-64.
Foy R, Hempel S, Rubenstein L, Suttorp M, Seelig M, Shanman R, Shekelle PG. Meta-analysis: effect of interactive communication between collaborating primary care physicians and specialists. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Feb 16;152(4):247-58. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-4-201002160-00010.
Parker LE, Ritchie MJ, Kirchner JE, Owen RR. Balancing health care evidence and art to meet clinical needs: policymakers' perspectives. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;15(6):970-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01209.x.
Rubenstein LV, Chaney EF, Ober S, Felker B, Sherman SE, Lanto A, Vivell S. Using evidence-based quality improvement methods for translating depression collaborative care research into practice. Fam Syst Health. 2010 Jun;28(2):91-113. doi: 10.1037/a0020302.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Project #0024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
PCC # 2004-121657
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MNT 03-215
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.