Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study Of Adults And Adolescents With Vasomotor Rhinitis (NCT NCT00117325)
NCT ID: NCT00117325
Last Updated: 2018-03-13
Results Overview
The daily rTNSS was the average of the AM (morning) and PM (before bed time) rTNSS assessments. Each rTNSS assessment comprised the sum of the three nasal symptom scores for rhinorrhea, nasal congestion and postnasal drip where each symptom was scored on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms).. The severity of symptoms was defined as 0: none-symptom was not present, 1: mild-sign/symptom was clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated, 2: moderate-definite awareness of sign/symptom that was bothersome but tolerable, 3: severe (sign/symptom was hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping. Change from Baseline was calculated as any post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline visit was 4 days prior to randomization (Day 1).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
352 participants
Baseline (4 days prior to randomization [Day 1]) and up to Week 4
2018-03-13
Participant Flow
The actual dose delivered from the product was 27.5 micrograms (µg) /actuation, which is therefore proposed as the label claim rather than 25 µg/actuation. Based on this spray content assessment, the dose examined in this study was actually 110 µg rather than the 100 µg dose indicated in the protocol.
Out of 901 participants screened, 549 participants were screen failures and hence were not randomized into the study. Out of 901 participants screened, 352 participants were randomized from 11 July 2005 to 16 January 2006.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 microgram (mcg) administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110 mcg QD
Participants received Fluticasone Furoate (GW 685698X) aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
173
|
179
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
160
|
167
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
12
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 microgram (mcg) administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110 mcg QD
Participants received Fluticasone Furoate (GW 685698X) aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
3
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
2
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Use of prohibited medicine
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Early termination
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Admisnitrative
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study Of Adults And Adolescents With Vasomotor Rhinitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=173 Participants
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110 mcg QD
n=179 Participants
Participants received GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Total
n=352 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
45.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.66 • n=5 Participants
|
46.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.77 • n=7 Participants
|
45.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.77 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
122 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
125 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
247 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
105 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
163 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
169 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
332 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (4 days prior to randomization [Day 1]) and up to Week 4Population: Due to irregularities found during a compliance audit, a reduced intent-to-treat (RITT) population was defined which excludes two participants from one of the investigative sites.
The daily rTNSS was the average of the AM (morning) and PM (before bed time) rTNSS assessments. Each rTNSS assessment comprised the sum of the three nasal symptom scores for rhinorrhea, nasal congestion and postnasal drip where each symptom was scored on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms).. The severity of symptoms was defined as 0: none-symptom was not present, 1: mild-sign/symptom was clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated, 2: moderate-definite awareness of sign/symptom that was bothersome but tolerable, 3: severe (sign/symptom was hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping. Change from Baseline was calculated as any post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline visit was 4 days prior to randomization (Day 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=170 Participants
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110 mcg QD
n=176 Participants
Participants received GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Daily Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)
|
-1.71 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-2.05 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (4 days prior to randomization [Day 1]) and up to Week 4Population: Reduced ITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
The AM, pre-dose, iTNSS is the sum of the 3 individual nasal symptom score assessments for rhinorrhea, nasal congestion and postnasal drip performed at the moment immediately prior to taking their dose where each symptom was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0= no symptoms, 3= severe symptoms). . The severity of symptoms was defined as 0: none-symptom was not present, 1: mild-sign/symptom was clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated, 2: moderate-definite awareness of sign/symptom that was bothersome but tolerable, 3: severe (sign/symptom was hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping. Change from baseline was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. Baseline visit was 4 days prior to randomization (Day 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=170 Participants
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110 mcg QD
n=176 Participants
Participants received GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Morning (AM), Pre-dose, Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Scores (iTNSS)
|
-1.48 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-1.87 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 4 weeksPopulation: RITT population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
The overall evaluation of Response to Therapy was based on a 7-point categorical scale where the participants rated their perception of the change or lack of change in their VMR (Vasomotor rhinitis) symptoms at the end of the study. The 7 categories were: 1=significantly improved, 2=moderately improved, 3= mildly improved, 4= no change, 5= mildly worse, 6= moderately worse, and 7= significantly worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=168 Participants
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110 mcg QD
n=176 Participants
Participants received GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Overall Evaluation of Response to Therapy
Significantly Improved
|
26 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Overall Evaluation of Response to Therapy
Moderately Improved
|
37 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Overall Evaluation of Response to Therapy
Mildly Improved
|
45 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Overall Evaluation of Response to Therapy
No Change
|
52 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Overall Evaluation of Response to Therapy
Mildly Worse
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Overall Evaluation of Response to Therapy
Moderately Worse
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Overall Evaluation of Response to Therapy
Significantly Worse
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (4 days prior to randomization [Day 1]) and up to Week 4Population: RITT population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
The rTNSS is a rating of the severity of symptoms over the previous 12 hours and is performed in the AM (AM rTNSS). . The severity of symptoms was defined as 0: none-symptom was not present, 1: mild-sign/symptom was clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated, 2: moderate-definite awareness of sign/symptom that was bothersome but tolerable, 3: severe (sign/symptom was hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping. The TNSS was the sum of the individual symptom scores for rhinorrhoea, nasal congestion and post-nasal drip which was scored on a scale of 0-3. Change from Baseline was calculated as post randomization value minus the Baseline value. Baseline visit was 4 days prior to randomization (Day 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=170 Participants
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110 mcg QD
n=176 Participants
Participants received GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in AM Pre-dose rTNSS
|
-1.69 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-2.04 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (4 days prior to randomization [Day 1]) and up to Week 4Population: RITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
The TNSS was the sum of the individual symptom scores for rhinorrhoea, nasal congestion and post-nasal drip which was scored on a scale of 0-3. The severity of symptoms was defined as 0: none-symptom was not present, 1: mild-sign/symptom was clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated, 2: moderate-definite awareness of sign/symptom that was bothersome but tolerable, 3: severe (sign/symptom was hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping. The rTNSS is a rating of the severity of symptoms over the previous 12 hours and is performed in the PM (PM rTNSS). Change from Baseline was calculated as any post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline visit was 4 days prior to randomization (Day 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=172 Participants
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110 mcg QD
n=178 Participants
Participants received GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Evening (PM) rTNSS
|
-1.77 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-2.07 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (4 days prior to randomization [Day 1]) and up to Week 4Population: RITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
The daily rTNSS was the average of the AM (morning) and PM (before bed time) rTNSS assessments.The TNSS was the sum of the individual symptom scores for rhinorrhoea, nasal congestion and post-nasal drip which was scored on a scale of 0-3. The severity of symptoms was defined as 0: none-symptom was not present, 1: mild-sign/symptom was clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated, 2: moderate-definite awareness of sign/symptom that was bothersome but tolerable, 3: severe (sign/symptom was hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping. Change from Baseline was calculated as any post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline visit was 4 days prior to randomization (Day 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=170 Participants
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110 mcg QD
n=176 Participants
Participants received GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Percent Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Daily rTNSS
|
-26.14 Percent change in score
Standard Error 2.45
|
-30.65 Percent change in score
Standard Error 2.40
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (4 days prior to randomization [Day 1]) and up to Week 4Population: RITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.
The AM, pre-dose, iTNSS is the sum of the 3 individual nasal symptom score assessments for rhinorrhea, nasal congestion and postnasal drip performed at the moment immediately prior to taking their dose where each symptom was scored on a scale of 0 to 3. The severity of symptoms was defined as 0: none-symptom was not present, 1: mild-sign/symptom was clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated, 2: moderate-definite awareness of sign/symptom that was bothersome but tolerable, 3: severe (sign/symptom was hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping. Change from Baseline was calculated as any post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline visit was 4 days prior to randomization (Day 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=170 Participants
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110 mcg QD
n=176 Participants
Participants received GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Percent Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in AM, Pre-dose iTNSS
|
-21.09 Percent change in score
Standard Error 2.54
|
-27.46 Percent change in score
Standard Error 2.50
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (4 days prior to randomization [Day 1]) and up to Week 4Population: RITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
The TNSS was the sum of the individual symptom scores for rhinorrhoea, nasal congestion and post-nasal drip which was scored on a scale of 0-3. The severity of symptoms was defined as 0: none-symptom was not present, 1: mild-sign/symptom was clearly present but minimal awareness; easily tolerated, 2: moderate-definite awareness of sign/symptom that was bothersome but tolerable, 3: severe (sign/symptom was hard to tolerate; causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping. The daily reflective nasal symptom scores was the average of the AM (morning) and PM (before bed time) rTNSS assessments. Each rTNSS assessment comprised the sum of the three nasal symptom. Change from Baseline was calculated as any post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline visit was 4 days prior to randomization (Day 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=172 Participants
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110 mcg QD
n=178 Participants
Participants received GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Individual Daily, Reflective Nasal Symptom Scores for Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion and Post-nasal Drip
Rhinorrhea
|
-0.50 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.62 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Individual Daily, Reflective Nasal Symptom Scores for Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion and Post-nasal Drip
Nasal Congestion
|
-0.68 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.81 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Individual Daily, Reflective Nasal Symptom Scores for Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion and Post-nasal Drip
Post-nasal Drip
|
-0.51 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.61 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (4 days prior to randomization [Day 1]) and up to Week 4Population: RITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
The AM, pre-dose, instantaneous nasal symptom score is the sum of the 3 individual nasal symptom score assessments for rhinorrhea, nasal congestion and postnasal drip performed at the moment immediately prior to taking their dose where each symptom was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0= no symptoms, 3= severe symptoms). Change from Baseline was calculated as any post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline visit was 4 days prior to randomization (Day 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=172 Participants
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110 mcg QD
n=178 Participants
Participants received GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Individual AM, Pre-dose, Instantaneous, Nasal Symptom Scores for Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion and Postnasal Drip
Rhinorrhea
|
-0.44 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.56 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Individual AM, Pre-dose, Instantaneous, Nasal Symptom Scores for Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion and Postnasal Drip
Nasal congestion
|
-0.54 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.70 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Individual AM, Pre-dose, Instantaneous, Nasal Symptom Scores for Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion and Postnasal Drip
Post-nasal drip
|
-0.48 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.60 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (4 days prior to randomization [Day 1]) and up to Week 4Population: RITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
The reflective nasal symptom score is a rating of the severity of symptoms over the previous 12 hours and is performed in the AM (AM rTNSS). Score assessments for rhinorrhea, nasal congestion and postnasal drip performed at the moment immediately prior to taking their dose where each symptom was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0= no symptoms, 3= severe symptoms). Change from Baseline was calculated as any post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline visit was 4 days prior to randomization (Day 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=172 Participants
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110 mcg QD
n=178 Participants
Participants received GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Individual AM, Reflective Nasal Symptom Scores for Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion and Postnasal Drip
Rhinorrhea
|
-0.48 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.61 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Individual AM, Reflective Nasal Symptom Scores for Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion and Postnasal Drip
Nasal congestion
|
-0.65 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.78 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Individual AM, Reflective Nasal Symptom Scores for Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion and Postnasal Drip
Post-nasal drip
|
-0.55 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.64 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (4 days prior to randomization [Day 1]) and up to Week 4Population: RITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
The reflective nasal symptom score is a rating of the severity of symptoms over the previous 12 hours and was performed in the PM (PM rTNSS). Score assessments for rhinorrhea, nasal congestion and postnasal drip performed at the moment immediately prior to taking their dose where each symptom was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0= no symptoms, 3= severe symptoms). Change from Baseline was calculated as any post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline visit was 4 days prior to randomization (Day 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=172 Participants
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110 mcg QD
n=178 Participants
Participants received GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Individual PM, Reflective, Nasal Symptom Scores for Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion and Postnasal Drip
Rhinorrhea
|
-0.53 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.59 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Individual PM, Reflective, Nasal Symptom Scores for Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion and Postnasal Drip
Nasal congestion
|
-0.73 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.84 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline Over the Entire Treatment Period in Individual PM, Reflective, Nasal Symptom Scores for Rhinorrhea, Nasal Congestion and Postnasal Drip
Post-nasal drip
|
-0.49 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.59 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (4 days prior to randomization [Day 1]) and Daily for 28 daysPopulation: RITT population. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
The onset of treatment effect was assessed by the mean change from Baseline in AM iTNSS (Days 1 to 28), the mean change from Baseline in daily rTNSS (Days 1 to 28), and mean change from Baseline in AM rTNSS and PM rTNSS. The time to maximum effect was also evaluated by the mean change from Baseline in daily rTNSS for Days 1 to 28. Change from Baseline was calculated as any post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline visit was 4 days prior to randomization (Day 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=172 Participants
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110 mcg QD
n=178 Participants
Participants received GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 4
|
-0.96 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
-1.22 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 21
|
-1.97 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.26 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 25
|
-1.93 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.36 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 26
|
-2.10 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.68 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 4
|
-1.11 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
-1.45 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 5
|
-1.33 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
-1.48 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 8
|
-1.74 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.85 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 10
|
-1.65 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.10 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 11
|
-1.66 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.96 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 12
|
-1.82 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.05 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 13
|
-1.87 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.06 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 16
|
-1.75 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.37 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 2
|
-0.97 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
-1.20 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 3
|
-1.12 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
-1.37 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 6
|
-1.30 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-1.59 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 7
|
-1.28 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.69 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 9
|
-1.73 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.94 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 14
|
-1.84 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.14 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 15
|
-1.67 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.15 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 17
|
-2.12 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.62 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 18
|
-2.22 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.48 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 19
|
-1.83 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.37 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 20
|
-2.18 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.42 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 21
|
-2.07 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.64 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 22
|
-2.02 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.44 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 23
|
-1.96 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.17 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 24
|
-2.03 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.57 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 25
|
-2.22 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.45 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 26
|
-2.19 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.59 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 27
|
-2.23 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.54 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 28
|
-1.82 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
-2.55 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.27
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 1
|
-0.88 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-0.97 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 2
|
-0.91 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
-1.19 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 3
|
-1.10 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
-1.39 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 4
|
-1.17 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
-1.42 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 5
|
-1.06 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
-1.29 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 6
|
-1.13 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.42 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 7
|
-1.48 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-1.64 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 8
|
-1.34 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-1.73 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 9
|
-1.49 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.89 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 10
|
-1.58 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.07 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 11
|
-1.62 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.02 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 12
|
-1.86 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.29 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 13
|
-1.91 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.18 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 14
|
-1.85 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.15 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 15
|
-1.78 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.15 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 16
|
-1.84 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.33 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 17
|
-1.81 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.51 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 18
|
-2.22 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.54 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 19
|
-2.23 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.53 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 20
|
-2.17 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.52 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 21
|
-2.19 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.48 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 22
|
-2.03 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.53 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 23
|
-2.06 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.41 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 24
|
-2.25 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.64 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 25
|
-2.39 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.42 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 26
|
-2.31 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.54 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 27
|
-2.25 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.54 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
PM rTNSS Day 28
|
-2.07 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
-2.68 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 1
|
-0.47 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-0.92 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 2
|
-0.69 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-1.01 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 3
|
-0.75 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
-1.14 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 5
|
-1.15 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-1.45 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 6
|
-1.01 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-1.59 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 7
|
-1.17 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-1.55 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 8
|
-1.38 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-1.61 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 9
|
-1.47 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-1.66 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 10
|
-1.31 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.78 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 11
|
-1.48 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-1.66 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AMiTNSS Day 12
|
-1.52 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-1.86 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 13
|
-1.48 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-1.83 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 14
|
-1.72 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.95 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 15
|
-1.54 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.92 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 16
|
-1.56 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.99 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 17
|
-1.64 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.20 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 18
|
-1.75 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.21 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 19
|
-1.70 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.33 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 20
|
-1.89 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.11 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 22
|
-1.73 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.32 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 23
|
-1.80 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.27 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 24
|
-1.93 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.40 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 27
|
-2.01 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-2.49 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM iTNSS Day 28
|
-1.96 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
-2.62 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.26
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 1
|
-0.71 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-0.93 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.15
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 2
|
-0.91 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-1.17 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 3
|
-1.07 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-1.38 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 4
|
-1.15 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-1.43 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 5
|
-1.22 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-1.35 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 6
|
-1.21 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
-1.51 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 7
|
-1.37 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
-1.66 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 8
|
-1.58 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
-1.82 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 9
|
-1.55 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-1.92 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 10
|
-1.60 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-2.06 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 11
|
-1.65 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-1.96 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 12
|
-1.81 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
-2.14 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 13
|
-1.87 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-2.12 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 14
|
-1.83 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-2.17 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 15
|
-1.70 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-2.11 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 16
|
-1.82 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-2.38 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 17
|
-1.94 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.53 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 18
|
-2.21 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-2.51 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 19
|
-1.99 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-2.44 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 20
|
-2.16 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-2.47 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 21
|
-2.12 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.54 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 22
|
-2.01 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.47 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 23
|
-1.99 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.30 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 24
|
-2.12 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-2.60 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 25
|
-2.28 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.44 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 26
|
-2.25 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.57 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 27
|
-2.23 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-2.51 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
rTNSS Day 28
|
-1.93 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
-2.58 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.26
|
|
Mean Scores Changes From Baseline as a Function of Time
AM rTNSS Day 1
|
-0.70 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.18
|
-1.02 Score on scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Fluticasone Furoate 110mcg QD
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=173 participants at risk
Participants received placebo matching with GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
Fluticasone Furoate 110mcg QD
n=179 participants at risk
Participants received GW685698X aqueous nasal spray 110 mcg administered as two sprays from the device into each nostril once daily every morning up to 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
13.3%
23/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
6.7%
12/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sinus headache
|
1.7%
3/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
1.1%
2/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
1.1%
2/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tension headache
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
4.6%
8/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
4.5%
8/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
2.3%
4/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
1.1%
2/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
1.2%
2/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes simplex
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Perianal abscess
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral pharyngitis
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
2.3%
4/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
2.2%
4/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngolaryngeal pain
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
2.8%
5/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
1.1%
2/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
1.1%
2/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
1.2%
2/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
1.1%
2/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal mucosal disorder
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal polyps
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal septum ulceration
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal ulcer
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinus congestion
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat irritation
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
2.8%
5/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
1.1%
2/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
1.1%
2/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
1.1%
2/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
1.2%
2/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomach discomfort
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ulcerative
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric disorder
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Glossodynia
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral pain
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tongue haemorrhage
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tongue ulceration
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
1.2%
2/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
1.7%
3/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
1.2%
2/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
1.1%
2/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
1.7%
3/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
1.7%
3/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Shoulder pain
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye
|
1.2%
2/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
1.1%
2/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis
|
1.2%
2/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pruritus
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
1.1%
2/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival oedema
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation decreased
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation increased
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular hyperaemia
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
General disorders
Chest discomfort
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
General disorders
Ill-defined disorder
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
General disorders
Irritability
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Hearing impaired
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tympanic membrane disorder
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod sting
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Back injury
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin laceration
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash papular
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dysmenorrhoea
|
1.7%
3/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram T wave inversion
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test abnormal
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
1.1%
2/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.56%
1/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Biliary colic
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Increased appetite
|
0.58%
1/173 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
0.00%
0/179 • AEs were collected from screening up to 32 days
ITT Population (participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug was used for the analysis of serious adverse event (SAE) and non-serious AEs. Non-serious AEs have been reported for the treatment period (28 days).
|
Additional Information
GSK Response Center
GlaxoSmithKline
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER