Community-Based Trial of Screening for Chlamydia Trachomatis to Prevent Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
NCT ID: NCT00115388
Last Updated: 2014-11-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2531 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-09-30
2008-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study is a randomised trial. It will involve asking women students in college bars to complete confidential questionnaires on sexual health and to provide self-administered vaginal swabs. We have successfully done this in a small pilot study. Participants will be told that the tests are for research purposes only and that if they think they may have been at risk of a sexually transmitted infection they should get checked at a clinic. If the trial shows that chlamydia screening using these new methods prevents PID, extending this community-based intervention nationwide could improve women's reproductive health and wellbeing and might prevent some women from becoming infertile
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objectives: To see if screening and treatment of chlamydial infection reduces the incidence of PID over 12 months, and to investigate the natural history of chlamydial infection and the role of bacterial vaginosis (BV) in the development of chlamydia associated PID.
Design: Randomised trial over one year
Setting: Common rooms, bars and lecture theatres at universities and colleges in London, UK.
Participants: 2500 sexually active female students aged \<28 years will be asked to complete a questionnaire on sexual health and to provide a self-administered vaginal swab and smear with follow up after a year.
Intervention: Following randomisation, vaginal swabs from intervention women will be tested for chlamydia by PCR and those infected referred for treatment. Vaginal swabs from control women will be stored and analysed after a year. Vaginal smears will be Gram stained and analysed for BV.
Main outcome measure: Incidence of clinical PID over 12 months in intervention and control groups.
Possible cases of PID will be identified from questionnaires and record searches. Confirmation of the diagnosis will be done by detailed review of medical records by two independent researchers blind to whether the woman is in the intervention or control group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Deferred screening control group
Samples from women in the control group were stored and tested at the end of the trial
Screening for chlamydia using self-taken vaginal swabs
Women in the intervention group will be tested for chlamydia and those found to be infected will be referred for treatment and partner notification
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Screening for chlamydia using self-taken vaginal swabs
Women in the intervention group will be tested for chlamydia and those found to be infected will be referred for treatment and partner notification
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Tested for chlamydia in past 3 months and no new sexual partner since then
* Pregnant
16 Years
27 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St George's, University of London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr Pippa Oakeshott
Professor of General Practice
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pippa Oakeshott, MD FRCP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St George's, University of London
Phillip Hay, FRCP
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
St George's, University of London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St George's Hospital Medical School
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hay PE, Kerry SR, Normansell R, Horner PJ, Reid F, Kerry SM, Prime K, Williams E, Simms I, Aghaizu A, Jensen J, Oakeshott P. Which sexually active young female students are most at risk of pelvic inflammatory disease? A prospective study. Sex Transm Infect. 2016 Feb;92(1):63-6. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052063. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
Oakeshott P, Kerry S, Aghaizu A, Atherton H, Hay S, Taylor-Robinson D, Simms I, Hay P. Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial. BMJ. 2010 Apr 8;340:c1642. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1642.
Oakeshott P, Kerry S, Atherton H, Aghaizu A, Hay S, Taylor-Robinson D, Simms I, Hay P. Community-based trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial. Trials. 2008 Dec 10;9:73. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-73.
Atherton H, Banks D, Harbit R, Long L, Chadd F, Hay P, Kerry S, Simms I, Oakeshott P. Recruitment of young women to a trial of chlamydia screening - as easy as it sounds? Trials. 2007 Dec 4;8:41. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-41.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
COHSR4PG
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id