Surgical Treatments Outcomes Project for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (STOP-DUB)

NCT ID: NCT00114088

Last Updated: 2005-06-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

242 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1997-11-30

Study Completion Date

2004-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

STOP-DUB is a multicenter randomized clinical trial that is assessing the efficacy and effectiveness of hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation (EA) for dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) in women for whom medical management has not provided relief.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Surgical Treatments Outcomes Project for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (STOP-DUB) is a multicenter, randomized clinical trial that assessed the efficacy and effectiveness of hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation (EA) for dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) in women for whom medical management has not provided relief. Institutional review board-approved study sites included the coordinating center, chair's office, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and 33 clinical centers in the United States and Canada. STOP-DUB enrolled (1) 237 eligible patients for whom medical treatment had not been successful and who were randomized to either hysterectomy or EA; and (2) an observational cohort of 139 patients who were "provisionally ineligible" or who were eligible but did not wish to be randomized. Enrollment began November 25, 1997 and ended June 30, 2001. Randomized women were followed using telephone interviews at least 2 years and observational women were followed a maximum of 6 months. We also collected information on return clinical center visits and hospital bills from the sites directly. The primary outcome addressed by the randomized trial is the impact of surgery on bleeding, pain, fatigue, and the major problem (symptom) that led the woman to seek treatment for her condition, measured 1 year following surgery. Additional outcomes included the impact of surgery at time points after 1 year; changes in quality of life, activity limitation, sexual functioning, and urinary incontinence; surgical complications; additional surgery; and resource utilization. The costs and the relative cost-effectiveness of the two surgeries will be calculated. The main scientific objective for the observational study was to examine changes over time in terms of treatment selected, DUB-related symptoms, and quality of life. Enrolled women signed an informed consent to participate.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Menorrhagia Uterine Bleeding

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Hysterectomy, Endometrial ablation, Ovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding, Anovulatory dysfucntional uterine bleeding, DUB Dysfunctional uterine bleeding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

endometrial ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Abnormal uterine bleeding in the absence of structural pathology, pharmacologic agents, IUD use, or systemic disorders of hemostasis that could explain the condition.

Exclusion Criteria

Prescreen

* Age \< 18 years
* Postmenopausal status (or bilateral oophorectomy)
* Bleeding not considered excessive by woman
* Desire to retain fertility
* Refusal to consider surgery
* Known myoma (from prior examination)

Eligibility Screen

* Lack of willingness to have a gynecologic or ultrasound examination
* Lack of willingness to be interviewed about bleeding or consider study
* Pregnancy
* Prior endometrial resection or ablation
* Prior myomectomy, myolysis, or hysterectomy

Medical History

* No tentative diagnosis of DUB
* History of malignancy of vagina, cervix, endometrium, or ovary
* History of complex endometrial hyperplasia or simple hyperplasia with atypia
* Current use of tamoxifen
* \< 6 months since onset of excessive uterine bleeding
* \< 9 months since stopping the use of IUD
* \< 9 months since stopping the use of implantable hormone agent
* \< 18 months since stopping use of Depo-Provera
* \< 6 months of anovulatory DUB after reaching euthyroid status for woman with diagnosis of hypothyroidism
* \< 3 months since pathology results indicate presence of endometrial polyp

Baseline Gynecologic Examination

* Enlarged (\>= 14 weeks gestational age) uterus
* Focal bleeding of genital, urinary, or gastrointestinal tract

Ultrasound Examination

* Presence of any submucosal myoma
* Presence of any myoma \>= 3 cm, any location
* Presence of \> 3 myomas, any size or location
* Presence of endometrial polyp(s)
* Malignancy of the vagina, cervix, endometrium, or ovary

Laboratory and Ancillary Tests

* FSH level in women ages \> 45 years confirming postmenopausal status
* Abnormal urinary tract or gastrointestinal tract imaging related to uterine bleeding
* Evidence of cervical cancer (screened by Pap smear in last 12 months and confirmed by colposcopy)
* Evidence of complex endometrial hyperplasia or simple hyperplasia with atypia or endometrial cancer (endometrial biopsy in last 12 months)
* Any test value inconsistent with a diagnosis of DUB
* Any test values, unlikely to change, compromising patient safety for surgery

Other

* Any existing medical condition, unlikely to change, putting patient at excessive risk for surgery
* Request for prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy by woman aged \<45 years
* Lack of willingness to comply with study requirements
* Uncooperative behavior
* Any coexisting condition that may influence a patient's ability to comply with participation
* Refusal to allow evaluation or follow-up
* In process of scheduling surgery at time of baseline visit

Provisional Eligibility Criteria

* Refusal of randomization
* \< 3 months of medical management (excluding GnRH agonist therapy) within the past 2 years
* Ongoing evaluation or treatment for abnormal cervical cytology (including endocervical polyps)
* Gastrointestinal or urinary tract condition unrelated to uterine bleeding currently being treated
* Any temporary test value compromising patient safety
* Any temporary existing medical condition putting patient at excessive risk from surgery
* Any coexisting condition requiring surgery (except tubal occlusion for any woman or oophorectomy for women \>= 45 years of age)
* Lack of willingness to proceed with surgery at this time
* Lack of willingness to proceed with surgery likely to result in infertility
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kay Dickersin, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Brown University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dickersin K, Munro M, Langenberg P, Scherer R, Frick KD, Weber AM, Johns A, Peipert JF, Clark M; Surgical Treatments Outcomes Project for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding Research Group. Surgical Treatments Outcomes Project for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (STOP-DUB): design and methods. Control Clin Trials. 2003 Oct;24(5):591-609. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00023-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14500057 (View on PubMed)

Weber AM, Munro MG. Endometrial ablation versus hysterectomy: STOP-DUB. Medscape Womens Health. 1998 May;3(3):3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9732095 (View on PubMed)

Frick KD, Clark MA, Steinwachs DM, Langenberg P, Stovall D, Munro MG, Dickersin K; STOP-DUB Research Group. Financial and quality-of-life burden of dysfunctional uterine bleeding among women agreeing to obtain surgical treatment. Womens Health Issues. 2009 Jan-Feb;19(1):70-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.07.002.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19111789 (View on PubMed)

Dickersin K, Munro MG, Clark M, Langenberg P, Scherer R, Frick K, Zhu Q, Hallock L, Nichols J, Yalcinkaya TM; Surgical Treatments Outcomes Project for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (STOP-DUB) Research Group. Hysterectomy compared with endometrial ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;110(6):1279-89. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000292083.97478.38.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 18055721 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5U01HS009506

Identifier Type: AHRQ

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link