Preventing Staphylococcal (Staph) Infection

NCT ID: NCT00108160

Last Updated: 2014-04-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

146 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-04-30

Study Completion Date

2012-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if mupirocin 2% in polyethylene glycol (PEG) ointment \[Treatment Arm\] is effective in preventing moderate to severe re-infection with Staphylococcus aureus compared with treatment with polyethylene glycol (PEG) ointment \[Placebo Arm\].

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Treatment of staphylococcal carriage with the topical antibiotic, mupirocin, has led to decreased infections in some hemodialysis patients and intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, most of these studies were not placebo controlled and only certain subsets of patients benefited. Relapse of colonization, generally within 90 days after treatment is stopped, presumably with increased risk of infection, approaches 50%. Continuous use of mupirocin on daily, three times weekly, or weekly basis has resulted in increased resistance to the drug. Despite this lack of evidence, the use of mupirocin has become commonplace because it is perceived as an effective and simple means to prevent infection. In a National Institutes on Aging/Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (NIA/OAIC)-sponsored proposal, we found that a 2 week treatment regimen with mupirocin ointment was effective in decolonizing older chronically ill nursing home residents of S. aureus when compared with placebo ointment. Decolonization began to decline by 3 months post-treatment, and resistance occurred only once in 52 treated patients. That study was not powered to detect differences in infection between the 2 study groups; the end point was eradication of colonization. However, a trend towards reduction in staphylococcal infection with mupirocin was seen. In addition, there were more therapeutic failures in residents who were colonized with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) than methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). We hypothesize that intermittent treatment with mupirocin ointment every 3 months may be an effective means of preventing recolonization and infection with S. aureus. We propose to study a patient population that has already had treatment for severe S. aureus infection and is at significant risk for a subsequent infection. Patients will receive mupirocin 2% polyethylene glycol (PEG) ointment \[Treatment Arm\] or polyethylene glycol (PEG) ointment \[Placebo Arm\] for 14 days every 3 months. The effect of these two regimens on S. aureus re-infection, re-colonization, and development of mupirocin resistance will be assessed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Staphylococcal Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mupirocin Ointment [Treatment]

Treatment arm or active comparator \[mupirocin 2% polyethylene glycol (PEG) ointment\] will be compared with its placebo comparator \[polyethylene glycol (PEF) in patients with a prior history of S. aureus infection. Drug or placebo will be applied topically to nares and/or wounds twice daily for 14 days at 3 month intervals for up to 18 months

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mupirocin Ointment [Treatment]

Intervention Type DRUG

The impact of the treatment arm versus placebo arm on development of new (recurrent) S. aureus infection will be assessed as the primary end point. Change in S. aureus strains (MSSA versus MRSA) will be assessed as the secondary end point.

Polyethylene Glycol Ointment [Placebo]

Treatment arm or active comparator \[mupirocin 2% polyethylene glycol (PEG) ointment\] will be compared with its placebo comparator \[polyethylene glycol (PEF) in patients with a prior history of S. aureus infection. Drug or placebo will be applied topically to nares and/or wounds twice daily for 14 days at 3 month intervals for up to 18 months

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Polyethylene Glycol Ointment [Placebo]

Intervention Type DRUG

The impact of the treatment arm versus placebo arm on development of S. aureus re-infections will be assessed as the primary end point. Change in S. aureus strains (MSSA versus MRSA) will be assessed as the secondary end point.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mupirocin Ointment [Treatment]

The impact of the treatment arm versus placebo arm on development of new (recurrent) S. aureus infection will be assessed as the primary end point. Change in S. aureus strains (MSSA versus MRSA) will be assessed as the secondary end point.

Intervention Type DRUG

Polyethylene Glycol Ointment [Placebo]

The impact of the treatment arm versus placebo arm on development of S. aureus re-infections will be assessed as the primary end point. Change in S. aureus strains (MSSA versus MRSA) will be assessed as the secondary end point.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Bactroban ointment Mupirocin 2% in Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Ointment PEG Ointment

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients who receive care at Ann Arbor VA Medical Center, University of Michigan Medical Center, or St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ypsilanti who have been hospitalized for documented S. aureus infection will be eligible for enrollment. Staphylococcal infections may be community or hospital-acquired. Patients with S. aureus infection will be identified on a daily basis with the assistance of the Infection Control Practitioner, the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, the Infectious Diseases Consultation Services, and Infectious Diseases physicians caring for patients in their offices.
* Patients will provide written informed consent. The patient's guardian or next of kin will be contacted for informed consent in the event that the patient is incapable of doing so.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who are unable to cooperate with treatment or follow-up.
* Patients who are not likely to survive beyond one month or those who are transferred back to another acute care hospital.
* Patients who require treatment with rifampin will be excluded since this drug is effective in decolonization of some staphylococcal carriers.
* Patients with known hypersensitivity to mupirocin ointment or polyethylene glycol base.
* Patients with ulcers obviously related to pressure will be excluded because they are frequently large, difficult to keep clean, and infections are difficult to diagnose.
* Patients with small vascular or neuropathic ulcers \< 3 cm in circumference and \< 2 cm in depth may be enrolled.
* Pregnant women.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Trinity Health Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

US Department of Veterans Affairs

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Suzanne Bradley, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CLNB-001-04S

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

STaph Aureus Resistance-Treat Early and Repeat (STAR-TER)
NCT03489629 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2
S. Aureus Screening and Decolonization
NCT02182115 COMPLETED PHASE4