Study of DOXIL/CAELYX (Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin) and VELCADE (Bortezomib) or VELCADE Monotherapy for the Treatment of Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

NCT ID: NCT00103506

Last Updated: 2015-10-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

646 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-12-31

Study Completion Date

2014-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate time to progression, overall survival, response rate and safety for the two open-label treatment groups; DOXIL/CAELYX in combination with VELCADE vs. VELCADE monotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), parallel-group, open-label (all involved people know the identity of the intervention), multicenter study in 18 countries. A total of 646 patients with multiple myeloma whose disease has progressed after an initial response to at least 1 line of prior therapy or was refractory to initial treatment will be enrolled. The primary endpoint is time to progression (the interval between the date of randomization and the date of disease progression); secondary endpoints are overall survival (the interval between the date of randomization and the patient's death from any cause), response rate (the proportion of patients in the evaluable population who achieved a complete or partial response), and safety. Other study endpoints include patient reported outcomes and exploratory pharmacogenics (to identify genetic markers of response). Patients are assessed for efficacy and safety every 3 weeks until disease progression is documented or for up to 42 weeks from the start of the first dose of study drug. Patients, who do not progress after the 42-week period, are assessed every 6 weeks until disease progression is documented. Efficacy evaluations includes: serum protein electrophoresis, 24-hour urine collection for protein electrophoresis, skeletal survey (plain films), bone marrow biopsy and aspirate, clinical or radiologic assessment of plasmacytomas, and serum calcium. Responses and progressions are assessed objectively by a computer algorithm based on the EBMT criteria. Safety evaluations include adverse event reports, changes in clinical laboratory findings, and tests for cardiac function (multiple gated acquisition scan/echocardiogram and electrocardiogram). Group A: VELCADE monotherapy: VELCADE 1.3 milligram per meter square (mg/m\^2) to be administered by i.v. bolus on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each 21-day cycle. Group B: DOXIL/VELCADE combination: treated with VELCADE at the same dose and schedule as specified in Group A. DOXIL/CAELYX 30 mg/m\^2 by intravenous infusion given on Day 4 of every 21-day cycle following the administration of VELCADE.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Myeloma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

VELCADE (bortezomib) monotherapy

Bortezomib (VELCADE) 1.3 milligram per meter square (mg/m\^2) by rapid (bolus) i.v. administration given on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each 21-day cycle for up to 8 cycles.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bortezomib (VELCADE)

Intervention Type DRUG

1.3 mg/m\^2 by rapid (bolus) i.v. administration given on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each 21-day cycle for up to 8 cycles.

DOXIL/CAELYX in combination with VELCADE (bortezomib)

Bortezomib (VELCADE) 1.3 mg/m\^2 by rapid (bolus) i.v. administration given on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each 21-day cycle for up to 8 cycles. Doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOXIL/CAELYX) 30 mg/m2 by i.v. infusion will be given on Day 4 of every 21-day cycle after the administration of bortezomib (VELCADE) for up to 8 cycles.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bortezomib (VELCADE)

Intervention Type DRUG

1.3 mg/m\^2 by rapid (bolus) i.v. administration given on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each 21-day cycle for up to 8 cycles..

Doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOXIL/CAELYX)

Intervention Type DRUG

mg/m\^2 by i.v. infusion will be given on Day 4 of every 21-day cycle after the administration of bortezomib (VELCADE) for up to 8 cycles.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bortezomib (VELCADE)

1.3 mg/m\^2 by rapid (bolus) i.v. administration given on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each 21-day cycle for up to 8 cycles.

Intervention Type DRUG

Bortezomib (VELCADE)

1.3 mg/m\^2 by rapid (bolus) i.v. administration given on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each 21-day cycle for up to 8 cycles..

Intervention Type DRUG

Doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOXIL/CAELYX)

mg/m\^2 by i.v. infusion will be given on Day 4 of every 21-day cycle after the administration of bortezomib (VELCADE) for up to 8 cycles.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least 1 prior therapy and who have either responded and later had progressive disease or have progressed during their first therapy (primary refractory) are eligible for the study
* Patients who may have received prior doxorubicin but not more than a cumulative dose of 240 milligram per meter square (mg/m\^2) doxorubicin, DOXIL, or the equivalent amount of another anthracycline (i.e., 1 mg doxorubicin = 1 mg DOXIL/CAELYX = 1.8 mg epirubicin = 0.3 mg mitoxantrone = 0.25 mg idarubicin)
* Must have normal cardiac function, as evidenced by a left LVEF within institutional normal limits.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of treatment with VELCADE or progressive disease while receiving an anthracycline-containing regimen
* No change in disease status during initial therapy
* No treatment for malignancy within past 5 yrs (other than multiple myeloma) or progressive disease while receiving anthracycline-containing regimen
* Non-secretory disease
* Myocardial infarct within past 6 months
* No major surgery in past 30 days.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC C. Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alabaster, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Surprise, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Berkeley, California, United States

Site Status

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Norwalk, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Stamford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Stuart, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Altanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

North Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Ciudad de Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

La Plata, , Argentina

Site Status

Mendoza, , Argentina

Site Status

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

Darlinghurst, , Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, , Australia

Site Status

Perth, , Australia

Site Status

Sydney, , Australia

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Wels, , Austria

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Mont-Godinne, , Belgium

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

N/a N/a, , Canada

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Praha 2 N/A, , Czechia

Site Status

Angers Cedex 1 N/A, , France

Site Status

Bobigny, , France

Site Status

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Lille Cedex N/A, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Tours, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Rehovot, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Amersfoort, , Netherlands

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Amsterdam-Zuidoost, , Netherlands

Site Status

Delft, , Netherlands

Site Status

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Nieuwegein, , Netherlands

Site Status

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

The Hague, , Netherlands

Site Status

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Arkhangelsk, , Russia

Site Status

Izhevsk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Obninsk, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Bloemfontein, , South Africa

Site Status

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Parktown, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria Gauteng, , South Africa

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Bath, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Canada Czechia France Israel Netherlands Poland Portugal Russia Singapore South Africa Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dimopoulos MA, Orlowski RZ, Facon T, Sonneveld P, Anderson KC, Beksac M, Benboubker L, Roddie H, Potamianou A, Couturier C, Feng H, Ataman O, van de Velde H, Richardson PG. Retrospective matched-pairs analysis of bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus bortezomib monotherapy in relapsed multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2015 Jan;100(1):100-6. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.112037. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25261096 (View on PubMed)

Sonneveld P, Hajek R, Nagler A, Spencer A, Blade J, Robak T, Zhuang SH, Harousseau JL, Orlowski RZ; DOXIL-MMY-3001 Study Investigators. Combined pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and bortezomib is highly effective in patients with recurrent or refractory multiple myeloma who received prior thalidomide/lenalidomide therapy. Cancer. 2008 Apr 1;112(7):1529-37. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23326.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 18300257 (View on PubMed)

Orlowski RZ, Nagler A, Sonneveld P, Blade J, Hajek R, Spencer A, San Miguel J, Robak T, Dmoszynska A, Horvath N, Spicka I, Sutherland HJ, Suvorov AN, Zhuang SH, Parekh T, Xiu L, Yuan Z, Rackoff W, Harousseau JL. Randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus bortezomib compared with bortezomib alone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: combination therapy improves time to progression. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Sep 1;25(25):3892-901. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.5460. Epub 2007 Aug 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 17679727 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DOXILMMY3001

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2004-001842-34

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR004117

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.