Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Thiazolidinediones or Thiazolidinediones and Metformin

NCT ID: NCT00099320

Last Updated: 2015-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

182 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-05-31

Study Completion Date

2005-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is designed to compare the effects of twice-daily exenatide plus oral antidiabetic (OAD) agents and twice-daily placebo plus OAD with respect to glycemic control, as measured by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), in patients with type 2 diabetes who experience inadequate glycemic control with OAD alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Exenatide

After a 2-week placebo lead-in period, exenatide will be given in an esclating dose along with the subject's current therapy regimen

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

exenatide

Intervention Type DRUG

After a 2-week placebo lead-in period (twice daily, given subcutaneously) in addition to their current therapy regimen, subjects will administer 20 mcg of exenatide (2 units \[5 μg\] ), twice daily by subcutaneous injection, for the first 4 weeks of therapy, and then 40 μL of study drug (4 units \[10 μg\] of exenatide) twice daily by subcutaneous injection, for the remaining 12 weeks of therapy.

Placebo

After a 2-week placebo lead-in period, subjects will be given placebo (in equivalent amounts to exenatide) in addition to their current therapy regimen.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

After a 2-week placebo lead-in period (twice daily, given subcutaneously) in addition to their current therapy regimen, subjects will administer placebo (in equivalent amounts to exenatide) for 16 weeks of therapy.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

exenatide

After a 2-week placebo lead-in period (twice daily, given subcutaneously) in addition to their current therapy regimen, subjects will administer 20 mcg of exenatide (2 units \[5 μg\] ), twice daily by subcutaneous injection, for the first 4 weeks of therapy, and then 40 μL of study drug (4 units \[10 μg\] of exenatide) twice daily by subcutaneous injection, for the remaining 12 weeks of therapy.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

After a 2-week placebo lead-in period (twice daily, given subcutaneously) in addition to their current therapy regimen, subjects will administer placebo (in equivalent amounts to exenatide) for 16 weeks of therapy.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Byetta AC2993 synthetic exendin-4

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Treated with thiazolidinedione (TZD) alone or in combination with metformin. TZD dose stable for at least 120 days prior to screening, and those patients on metformin must have been on a stable dose for at least 30 days prior to screening.
* HbA1c between 7.1% and 10.0%, inclusive.
* Body mass index (BMI) between 25 kg/m\^2 and 45 kg/m\^2.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient previously in a study using exenatide or GLP-1 analogs.
* Treated with oral anti-diabetic medications other than TZD and metformin within 3 months of screening.
* Treated with oral insulin within 3 months of screening.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eli Lilly and Company

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James Malone, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Eli Lilly and Company

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Mateo, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spring Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Melbourne, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Butte, Montana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

McCook, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

North Platte, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Scottsbluff, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Princeton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Georgetown, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

The Colony, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Olympia, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Renton, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charleston, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Huntington, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fineman MS, Mace KF, Diamant M, Darsow T, Cirincione BB, Booker Porter TK, Kinninger LA, Trautmann ME. Clinical relevance of anti-exenatide antibodies: safety, efficacy and cross-reactivity with long-term treatment. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Jun;14(6):546-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01561.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22236356 (View on PubMed)

Zinman B, Hoogwerf BJ, Duran Garcia S, Milton DR, Giaconia JM, Kim DD, Trautmann ME, Brodows RG. The effect of adding exenatide to a thiazolidinedione in suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Apr 3;146(7):477-85. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-7-200704030-00003.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 17404349 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H8O-MC-GWAP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.