Tetracycline in Preventing Skin Rash in Patients Who Are Receiving Drugs Such as Gefitinib and Cetuximab for Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00091247

Last Updated: 2017-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-12-31

Study Completion Date

2009-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Tetracycline may be effective in preventing skin rash that is caused by treatment with drugs such as gefitinib or cetuximab.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying tetracycline to see how well it works compared to placebo in preventing skin rash in patients who are receiving drugs such as gefitinib or cetuximab for cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

* Compare the 1-month incidence and severity of gefitinib-, cetuximab-, or other epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-induced skin rash development in patients with cancer treated with tetracycline vs placebo.
* Compare the toxicity of these drugs in these patients.
* Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these drugs who develop vs those who do not develop a rash.
* Determine whether patients who discontinue tetracycline at 1 month develop a rash.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to prior chemotherapy regimen (first-line therapy vs other), concurrent epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor therapy (gefitinib vs cetuximab vs other), and concurrent corticosteroid therapy (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

* Arm I: Patients receive oral tetracycline twice daily.
* Arm II: Patients receive oral placebo twice daily. In both arms, treatment continues for 4 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then weekly for 8 weeks.

Patients are followed at weeks 4 and 8.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 126 patients will be accrued for this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

tetracycline

Patients receive oral tetracycline twice daily. Treatment continues for 4 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then weekly for 8 weeks.

Patients are followed at weeks 4 and 8.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

tetracycline hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

Patients receive oral placebo twice daily. Treatment continues for 4 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then weekly for 8 weeks.

Patients are followed at weeks 4 and 8.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tetracycline hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Diagnosis of cancer
* Began therapy within the past 7 days or plans to begin therapy within 7 days after study entry with one of the following epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors:

* Gefitinib
* Cetuximab
* Erlotinib
* Monoclonal antibody ABX-EGF
* ICR-62
* CI-1033
* EMD-72000
* No rash at study entry

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

* 18 and over

Hepatic

* Bilirubin ≤ 2 mg/dL

Renal

* Creatinine ≤ 2 mg/dL

Other

* Not pregnant or nursing
* Negative pregnancy test
* Fertile patients must use effective non-hormonal contraception
* Able to take oral medication
* No history of skin condition that may flare during study treatment
* No prior allergic reaction or severe intolerance to tetracycline or one of its derivatives
* No severe nausea or vomiting that would preclude retaining study drug

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Other

* More than 1 week since prior tetracycline
* No milk products, antacids, or calcium supplements for 2 hours before until 2 hours after drug administration
* No other concurrent tetracycline
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aminah Jatoi, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rush-Copley Cancer Care Center

Aurora, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Joliet Oncology-Hematology Associates, Limited - West

Joliet, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Carle Cancer Center at Carle Foundation Hospital

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Carle Cancer Center

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Saint Anthony Memorial Health Centers

Michigan City, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Cedar Rapids Oncology Associates

Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Siouxland Hematology-Oncology Associates, LLP

Sioux City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Mercy Medical Center - Sioux City

Sioux City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

St. Luke's Regional Medical Center

Sioux City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Chanute

Chanute, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Dodge City

Dodge City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - El Dorado

El Dorado, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Kingman

Kingman, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Southwest Medical Center

Liberal, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Newton

Newton, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Parsons

Parsons, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Pratt

Pratt, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Salina

Salina, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Wellington

Wellington, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Associates in Womens Health, PA - North Review

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Medical Arts Tower

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Wichita

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Wichita

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Via Christi Cancer Center at Via Christi Regional Medical Center

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Winfield

Winfield, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Hickman Cancer Center at Bixby Medical Center

Adrian, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Saint Joseph Mercy Cancer Center

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Michigan Cancer Research Consortium

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Oakwood Cancer Center at Oakwood Hospital and Medical Center

Dearborn, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Genesys Hurley Cancer Institute

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Hurley Medical Center

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Van Elslander Cancer Center at St. John Hospital and Medical Center

Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Foote Memorial Hospital

Jackson, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Haematology-Oncology Associates of Ohio and Michigan, PC

Lambertville, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Sparrow Regional Cancer Center

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

St. Mary Mercy Hospital

Livonia, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Community Cancer Center of Monroe

Monroe, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Mercy Memorial Hospital - Monroe

Monroe, Michigan, United States

Site Status

St. Joseph Mercy Oakland

Pontiac, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Mercy Regional Cancer Center at Mercy Hospital

Port Huron, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Seton Cancer Institute at Saint Mary's - Saginaw

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Site Status

St. John Macomb Hospital

Warren, Michigan, United States

Site Status

MeritCare Bemidji

Bemidji, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Duluth Clinic Cancer Center - Duluth

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Duluth

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Miller - Dwan Medical Center

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Immanuel St. Joseph's

Mankato, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Cancer Center

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

CCOP - MeritCare Hospital

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

MeritCare Broadway

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Wood County Oncology Center

Bowling Green, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Hematology Oncology Center

Elyria, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Lima Memorial Hospital

Lima, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Northwest Ohio Oncology Center

Maumee, Ohio, United States

Site Status

St. Luke's Hospital

Maumee, Ohio, United States

Site Status

St. Charles Mercy Hospital

Oregon, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo Clinic - Oregon

Oregon, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Firelands Regional Medical Center

Sandusky, Ohio, United States

Site Status

North Coast Cancer Care, Incorporated

Sandusky, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Flower Hospital Cancer Center

Sylvania, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mercy Hospital of Tiffin

Tiffin, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo Hospital

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

St. Vincent Mercy Medical Center

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Medical University of Ohio Cancer Center

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Toledo Community Hospital

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo Clinic, Incorporated - Main Clinic

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Fulton County Health Center

Wauseon, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Fredericksburg Oncology, Incorporated

Fredericksburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Franciscan Skemp Healthcare - La Crosse Campus

La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Atherton PJ, Burger KN, Loprinzi CL, Neben Wittich MA, Miller RC, Jatoi A, Sloan JA. Using the Skindex-16 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to assess rash symptoms: results of a pooled-analysis (N0993). Support Care Cancer. 2012 Aug;20(8):1729-35. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1266-x. Epub 2011 Sep 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21922203 (View on PubMed)

Jatoi A, Dakhil SR, Sloan JA, Kugler JW, Rowland KM Jr, Schaefer PL, Novotny PJ, Wender DB, Gross HM, Loprinzi CL; North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Prophylactic tetracycline does not diminish the severity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor-induced rash: results from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (Supplementary N03CB). Support Care Cancer. 2011 Oct;19(10):1601-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0988-5. Epub 2010 Sep 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20820817 (View on PubMed)

Jatoi A, Rowland K, Sloan JA, Gross HM, Fishkin PA, Kahanic SP, Novotny PJ, Schaefer PL, Johnson DB, Tschetter LK, Loprinzi CL. Tetracycline to prevent epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-induced skin rashes: results of a placebo-controlled trial from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (N03CB). Cancer. 2008 Aug 15;113(4):847-53. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23621.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18543329 (View on PubMed)

Jatoi A, Rowland K, Sloan JA, et al.: Does tetracycline prevent/palliate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor-induced rash? A phase III trial from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (N03CB). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-LBA9006, 494s, 2007.

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2011-01620

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000385682

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NCCTG-N03CB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.