Epothilone (Ixabepilone) Plus Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine Alone in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00082433

Last Updated: 2020-11-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1221 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-11-30

Study Completion Date

2008-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if BMS-247550 added to the approved therapy of capecitabine (Xeloda) provides measurable clinical benefits over capecitabine alone in women with metastatic breast cancer. Patients should have previously received an anthracycline and a taxane. The safety of this treatment will also be studied.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ixabepilone + Capecitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Ixabepilone lypholized powder/Diluent for solution for injection/Tablets, IV/Oral, 40 mg/m2 + Capecitabine 2000 mg/m2, Ixabepilone on Day 1 and Capecitabine twice daily Days 1-14 of 21 day cycle

B

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Capecitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablet, Oral, 2500 mg/m2, Capecitabine twice daily Days 1-14 of 21 day cycle

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ixabepilone + Capecitabine

Ixabepilone lypholized powder/Diluent for solution for injection/Tablets, IV/Oral, 40 mg/m2 + Capecitabine 2000 mg/m2, Ixabepilone on Day 1 and Capecitabine twice daily Days 1-14 of 21 day cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

Capecitabine

Tablet, Oral, 2500 mg/m2, Capecitabine twice daily Days 1-14 of 21 day cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

IXEMPRA® Epothilone

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients must have received prior treatment which included both an anthracycline (i.e., doxorubicin or epirubicin) and a taxane (i.e., paclitaxel or docetaxel).
* Patients must have received no more than two prior chemotherapy regimens. Patients who have not received treatment for metastatic disease must have relapsed within one year.
* Patients may not have any history of brain and/or leptomeningeal metastases.
* Patients may not have Grade 2 or worse neuropathy at the time of study entry.
* Patients may not have had prior treatment with any epothilones and/or capecitabine (i.e. Xeloda)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

R-Pharm

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Local Institution

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Corona, California, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Latham, New York, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Mineola, New York, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Goldsboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Kinston, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Langhorne, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Local Institution

Avellaneda, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Belén de Escobar, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Resistencia, Chaco Province, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Barrio Alto Verde, Córdoba Province, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Mendoza, , Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Salta, , Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Santa Fe, , Argentina

Site Status

Local Institution

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Westmead, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Herston, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Woodville, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Local Institution

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Local Institution

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Local Institution

Vöcklabruck, , Austria

Site Status

Local Institution

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Charleroi, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Hasselt, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Wilrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Local Institution

Centro-Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Bela Vista, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Higienopolis, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil

Site Status

Local Institution

Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Local Institution

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Local Institution

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Local Institution

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Local Institution

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

Local Institution

Dalian, Liaoning, China

Site Status

Local Institution

Dilian, Liaoning, China

Site Status

Local Institution

Jinan, Shandong, China

Site Status

Local Institution

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Local Institution

Xi’an, Shanxi, China

Site Status

Local Institution

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Local Institution

Split, , Croatia

Site Status

Local Institution

Zagreb, , Croatia

Site Status

Local Institution

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Local Institution

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Local Institution

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Local Institution

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Local Institution

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status

Local Institution

København Ø, , Denmark

Site Status

Local Institution

Angers, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Caen, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Colmar, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Metz, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Paris, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Reims, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint-Brieuc, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint-Grégoire, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint-Herblain, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Tours, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Local Institution

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Karlsruhe, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

München, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Rehling, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Saarbrücken, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Wiesbaden, , Germany

Site Status

Local Institution

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Local Institution

Crete, , Greece

Site Status

Local Institution

Pátrai, , Greece

Site Status

Local Institution

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Local Institution

Wilton, Cork, Ireland

Site Status

Local Institution

Cork, , Ireland

Site Status

Local Institution

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Local Institution

Galway, , Ireland

Site Status

Local Institution

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Local Institution

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Local Institution

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Local Institution

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Local Institution

Rozzano, Milan, Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Bari, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Modena, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Perugia, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Potenza, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

San Giovanni Rotondo, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Sora, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Local Institution

Arnhem, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Enschede, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

The Hague, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Zwolle, , Netherlands

Site Status

Local Institution

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Local Institution

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Local Institution

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Local Institution

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Local Institution

Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Panorama, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Local Institution

Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Local Institution

Terassa, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Cadiz, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Elche (Alicante), , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Jaén, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Pontevedra, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Reus, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Santa Cruz de Tenerife, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Local Institution

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Local Institution

Thun, , Switzerland

Site Status

Local Institution

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Local Institution

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Local Institution

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Local Institution

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Local Institution

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Local Institution

Belfast, Armagh, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Glasgow, Central, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Shrewsbury, Shropshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Local Institution

Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Chile China Croatia Czechia Denmark France Germany Greece Ireland Israel Italy Netherlands Portugal Russia Singapore South Africa South Korea Spain Switzerland Taiwan Turkey (Türkiye) United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wedam SB, Beaver JA, Amiri-Kordestani L, Bloomquist E, Tang S, Goldberg KB, Sridhara R, Ibrahim A, Kim G, Kluetz P, McKee A, Pazdur R. US Food and Drug Administration Pooled Analysis to Assess the Impact of Bone-Only Metastatic Breast Cancer on Clinical Trial Outcomes and Radiographic Assessments. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 20;36(12):1225-1231. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.6917. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29522361 (View on PubMed)

Vahdat LT, Vrdoljak E, Gomez H, Li RK, Bosserman L, Sparano JA, Baselga J, Mukhopadhyay P, Valero V. Efficacy and safety of ixabepilone plus capecitabine in elderly patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. J Geriatr Oncol. 2013 Oct;4(4):346-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24472478 (View on PubMed)

Jassem J, Fein L, Karwal M, Campone M, Peck R, Poulart V, Vahdat L. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine in advanced breast cancer patients with early relapse after adjuvant anthracyclines and taxanes: a pooled subset analysis of two phase III studies. Breast. 2012 Feb;21(1):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Sep 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21937232 (View on PubMed)

Roche H, Conte P, Perez EA, Sparano JA, Xu B, Jassem J, Peck R, Kelleher T, Hortobagyi GN. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer patients with reduced performance status previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes: a pooled analysis by performance status of efficacy and safety data from 2 phase III studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Feb;125(3):755-65. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1251-y. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21128114 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CA163-048

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id