Chemotherapy Before Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation +/- Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT00078949

Last Updated: 2023-08-23

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: PHASE3
• Total Enrollment: 849 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2003-08-27
• Study Completion Date: 2018-12-31

Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as dexamethasone, cisplatin, gemcitabine, and cytarabine, work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, can locate cancer cells and either kill them or deliver cancer-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. Giving rituximab as maintenance therapy after stem cell transplantation may kill any remaining cancer cells. It is not yet known which salvage chemotherapy regimen is more effective before autologous stem cell transplantation in treating relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying salvage chemotherapy using dexamethasone, cisplatin, and gemcitabine to see how well it works compared to dexamethasone, cisplatin, and cytarabine given before autologous stem cell transplantation in treating patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This trial also is studying giving rituximab as maintenance therapy to see how well it works compared to no further therapy after stem cell transplantation. Rituximab was added to both salvage treatment arms for CD20+ patients in a protocol amendment in 2005.

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Salvage therapy

Primary

• Compare the response rate and transplantation rate in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma when treated with salvage chemotherapy comprising dexamethasone, cisplatin, and gemcitabine with or without rituximab vs a standard platinum-based regimen (dexamethasone, cisplatin, and high-dose cytarabine with or without rituximab).
• To compare the transplantation rates of the two protocol salvage regimens.

Secondary

• Compare the event-free and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
• Compare the success rate of these regimens, in terms of getting patients to autologous stem cell transplantation and successful mobilization after high-dose chemotherapy.
• Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these salvage regimens.
• Compare the toxic effects of these salvage regimens in these patients.
• Compare resource utilization for patients treated with these salvage regimens.
• Compare relative medical and societal costs of these salvage regimens with outcomes in these patients.

Maintenance therapy

Primary

• Compare the 2-year event-free survival of patients with CD20+ B-cell lymphoma treated with maintenance rituximab after these salvage regimens and autologous stem cell transplantation to those patients who received no further treatment.

Secondary

• Compare the 2-year survival of patients treated with or without maintenance rituximab.
• Compare the toxic effects of rituximab vs observation alone in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. For salvage therapy, patients are stratified according to participating center, International Prognostic Index score at relapse/study entry (0 or 1 vs 2 vs ≥ 3), immunophenotype (B cell vs T cell), response to or response duration after initial chemotherapy (no response or progressive disease vs > 1 year vs ≤ 1 year), and prior rituximab (yes vs no). For maintenance therapy, patients are stratified according to participating center, salvage therapy treatment randomization (with or without rituximab, cisplatin, dexamethasone, and gemcitabine vs with or without rituximab, cisplatin, dexamethasone, and cytarabine), response to salvage therapy (complete response [CR] and CR unconfirmed [CRu] vs partial response [PR] vs stable disease [SD]), and prior rituximab (yes vs no).

• Salvage therapy: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

• Arm I: Patients receive cisplatin IV over 60 minutes on day 1, dexamethasone IV or orally on days 1-4, and gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8. Patients with CD20+ B cell lymphoma receive rituximab IV over 1.5-6 hours on day 1.
• Arm II: Patients receive cisplatin IV over 24 hours on day 1, dexamethasone as in arm I, and cytarabine IV over 3 hours every 12 hours for a total of 2 doses on day 2. Patients with CD20+ B cell lymphoma receive rituximab IV over 1.5-6 hours on day 1.

In both arms, treatment repeats every 21 days for at least 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients are reassessed after 2 courses. Patients with progressive disease are removed from study. Patients with a CR, CRu, or PR proceed to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients with SD may proceed to ASCT or receive 1 additional course of salvage therapy at the discretion of the investigator. Patients receiving an additional course of salvage therapy are then reassessed after the completion of therapy. Patients with progressive disease are removed from study. Patients with a PR proceed to ASCT. Patients with SD may proceed to ASCT or be followed off study at the discretion of the investigator.

• ASCT: Responding patients (or those with stable disease, if that is the center's policy)undergo mobilization, stem cell harvest, and subsequent ASCT. Patients with CD20+ B-cell disease are randomized to maintenance therapy or observation.
• Maintenance therapy: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

• Arm I: Beginning on day 28 posttransplantation, patients receive rituximab IV once every 2 months for 6 doses (a total of 12 months) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
• Arm II: Patients undergo observation only. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, days 1 and 10 of course 2, day 1 of course 3 (if given), on the last day of salvage therapy (or the first day of mobilization, if given), and at 1 month posttransplantation.

Patients who undergo ASCT are followed at months 1, 3, 7, 13, 19, and 25 and then annually thereafter. Patients who complete salvage therapy, but do not undergo ASCT are followed at months 4, 8, 14, 20, and 26 and then annually thereafter. Patients who relapse or progress are followed every 6 months until 25 months from ASCT or 26 months from completion of salvage therapy and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 637 patients will be accrued for this study within 3-4 years for the first randomization, and 240 transplanted CD20+ patients will be needed for the second randomization.

Conditions

Lymphoma

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Salvage arm I

Patients receive cisplatin IV over 60 minutes on day 1, dexamethasone IV or orally on days 1-4, and gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

cisplatin

Intervention Type: DRUG

Given IV

dexamethasone

Intervention Type: DRUG

Given IV

gemcitabine hydrochloride

Intervention Type: DRUG

Given IV

Salvage arm II

Patients receive cisplatin IV over 24 hours on day 1, dexamethasone as in arm I, and cytarabine IV over 3 hours every 12 hours for a total of 2 doses on day 2.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

cisplatin

Intervention Type: DRUG

Given IV

cytarabine

Intervention Type: DRUG

Given IV

dexamethasone

Intervention Type: DRUG

Given IV

Maintenance arm I

Beginning on day 28 posttransplantation, patients receive rituximab IV once every 2 months for 6 doses (a total of 12 months) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

rituximab

Intervention Type: BIOLOGICAL

Given IV

Maintenance arm II

Patients undergo observation only.

Group Type: NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

rituximab

Given IV

Intervention Type: BIOLOGICAL

cisplatin

Given IV

Intervention Type: DRUG

cytarabine

Given IV

Intervention Type: DRUG

dexamethasone

Given IV

Intervention Type: DRUG

gemcitabine hydrochloride

Given IV

Intervention Type: DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

• Histologically confirmed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of 1 of the following subtypes:

• Diffuse large cell lymphoma (includes primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and T-cell-rich B-cell lymphoma)
• Prior indolent lymphoma (e.g., follicular center cell lymphoma; marginal zone lymphoma, including extranodal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue [MALT] lymphoma; and lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma) with transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at relapse

• Must be histologically confirmed
• No transformed lymphoma at diagnosis with subsequent indolent histology without transformation at relapse
• Peripheral T-cell lymphoma
• Anaplastic large cell lymphoma
• Small noncleaved Burkitt-like lymphoma
• T-cell or B-cell lineage confirmed by immunohistochemistry
• Clinically or radiologically documented disease meeting either of the following criteria:

• Measurable disease, defined as at least 1 bidimensionally measurable site of disease using clinical exam, CT scan, or MRI

• Lymph nodes must be > 1.5 cm by physical exam or CT scan
• Other non-nodal lesions must be ≥ 1.0 cm by physical exam, CT scan, or MRI
• Bone lesions are not considered measurable
• Evaluable disease, defined as only nonmeasurable disease, including any of the following:

• Marrow infiltration
• Cytology-confirmed ascites or effusions
• Bony involvement
• Enlarged liver or spleen
• Unidimensionally measurable intrathoracic or abdominal masses
• Previously treated with 1, and only 1, chemotherapy regimen including an anthracycline and excluding cisplatin, cytarabine, and gemcitabine
• No uncontrolled CNS involvement by lymphoma

• No CNS disease at time of relapse
• CNS disease diagnosed at initial presentation allowed provided a complete response for CNS disease was achieved and maintained

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

• 16 to 65

Performance status

• ECOG 0-3

Life expectancy

• At least 12 weeks

Hematopoietic

• Absolute granulocyte count ≥ 1,000/mm^3
• Platelet count ≥ 75,000/mm^3

Hepatic

• Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
• AST or ALT ≤ 2.5 times ULN (5 times ULN if liver involvement with lymphoma)
• Hepatitis B status known (for patients with a history of hepatitis B or who are at high risk of hepatitis B infection)

Renal

• Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN

Cardiovascular

• No significant cardiac dysfunction or cardiovascular disease

Other

• Not pregnant or nursing
• Negative pregnancy test
• Fertile patients must use effective contraception
• Willing to complete quality of life questionnaires
• HIV negative
• No active, uncontrolled bacterial, fungal, or viral infection
• No other malignancy within the past 5 years except adequately treated basal cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
• No other concurrent serious illness or medical condition that would preclude study participation

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

• See Chemotherapy
• Prior rituximab allowed

Chemotherapy

• See Disease Characteristics
• At least 4 weeks since prior IV chemotherapy
• No prior high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation

Endocrine therapy

• No concurrent corticosteroids except for physiologic replacement

Radiotherapy

• At least 4 weeks since prior radiotherapy and recovered

• Exceptions may be made for low-dose, non-myelosuppressive radiotherapy
• No prior radiotherapy to more than 25% of functioning bone marrow
• Involved-field radiotherapy may be given to areas of bulky disease at relapse (≥ 5 cm) after stem cell transplantation, according to the center's policy

Surgery

• At least 2 weeks since prior major surgery

Other

• No other concurrent anticancer therapy
• No other concurrent experimental agents

• Minimum Eligible Age: 16 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

NCIC Clinical Trials Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Michael R. Crump, MD, FRCPC

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada

Massimo Federico, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena

Locations

Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Centre

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Indiana University Medical Center

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Hackensack University Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

University of Cincinnati, Barrett Cancer Centre

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

The Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Woodville, South Australia, Australia

Tom Baker Cancer Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Cross Cancer Institute

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

CancerCare Manitoba

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

The Moncton Hospital

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

QEII Health Sciences Center

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

London Regional Cancer Program

London, Ontario, Canada

Credit Valley Hospital

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Thunder Bay Regional Health Science Centre

Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

Odette Cancer Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Univ. Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Hopital Charles LeMoyne

Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada

CHUM - Hopital Notre-Dame

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

CHUQ-Pavillon Hotel-Dieu de Quebec

Québec, Quebec, Canada

CHA-Hopital Du St-Sacrement

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Allan Blair Cancer Centre

Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

Saskatoon Cancer Centre

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Countries

United States; Australia; Canada

References

Gupta A, Hay AE, Crump M, Djurfeldt MS, Zhu L, Cheung MC, Shepherd LE, Chen BE, Booth CM. Contact Days Associated With Cancer Treatments in the CCTG LY.12 Trial. Oncologist. 2023 Sep 7;28(9):799-803. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad128.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 37226534 (View on PubMed)

Crump M, Kuruvilla J, Couban S, MacDonald DA, Kukreti V, Kouroukis CT, Rubinger M, Buckstein R, Imrie KR, Federico M, Di Renzo N, Howson-Jan K, Baetz T, Kaizer L, Voralia M, Olney HJ, Turner AR, Sussman J, Hay AE, Djurfeldt MS, Meyer RM, Chen BE, Shepherd LE. Randomized comparison of gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin versus dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin chemotherapy before autologous stem-cell transplantation for relapsed and refractory aggressive lymphomas: NCIC-CTG LY.12. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 1;32(31):3490-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.9593. Epub 2014 Sep 29.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 25267740 (View on PubMed)

Gupta A, Thomas T, Hay AE, Crump M, Djurfeldt MS, Cheung MC, Prica A, Shepherd LE, Chen BE, Booth CM. The association of health care contact days with economic measures in the CCTG LY.12 trial. Oncologist. 2025 Jun 4;30(6):oyaf165. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf165.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 40503814 (View on PubMed)

Assouline S, Li S, Gisselbrecht C, Fogarty P, Hay A, van den Neste E, Shepherd LE, Schmitz N, Baetz T, Keating A, Robinson S, Seftel M, Stelitano C, Djurfeldt MS, Meyer R, Chen BE, Crump M. The conditional survival analysis of relapsed DLBCL after autologous transplant: a subgroup analysis of LY.12 and CORAL. Blood Adv. 2020 May 12;4(9):2011-2017. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001646.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 32396614 (View on PubMed)

Bosch M, Akhter A, Chen BE, Mansoor A, Lebrun D, Good D, Crump M, Shepherd L, Scott DW, Stewart DA. A bioclinical prognostic model using MYC and BCL2 predicts outcome in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Haematologica. 2018 Feb;103(2):288-296. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.179309. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 29097500 (View on PubMed)

Davison K, Chen BE, Kukreti V, Couban S, Benger A, Berinstein NL, Kaizer L, Desjardins P, Mangel J, Zhu L, Djurfeldt MS, Hay AE, Shepherd LE, Crump M. Treatment outcomes for older patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphoma receiving salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation are similar to younger patients: a subgroup analysis from the phase III CCTG LY.12 trial. Ann Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;28(3):622-627. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw653.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 27993811 (View on PubMed)

Kuruvilla J, MacDonald DA, Kouroukis CT, Cheung M, Olney HJ, Turner AR, Anglin P, Seftel M, Ismail WS, Luminari S, Couban S, Baetz T, Meyer RM, Hay AE, Shepherd L, Djurfeldt MS, Alamoudi S, Chen BE, Crump M. Salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for transformed indolent lymphoma: a subset analysis of NCIC CTG LY12. Blood. 2015 Aug 6;126(6):733-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-622084. Epub 2015 Jun 24.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 26109202 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

CAN-NCIC-LY12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000353203

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

LY12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT00089817

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias