Comparison of Fluconazole vs Voriconazole to Treat Fungal Infections for Blood and Marrow Transplants (BMT CTN 0101)

NCT ID: NCT00075803

Last Updated: 2023-01-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-11-30

Study Completion Date

2007-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is designed as a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, prospective, comparative study of fluconazole versus voriconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in allogeneic transplant recipients. Recipients will be stratified by center and donor type (sibling vs. unrelated) and will be randomized to either the fluconazole or voriconazole arm in a 1:1 ratio.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND:

Allogeneic blood and marrow transplant patients are highly susceptible to invasive fungal infection prior to engraftment, due to neutropenia and mucosal injury. After engraftment, an impairment of cell mediated immunity from graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and the use of aggressive immunosuppressive therapies, such as corticosteroids, leave patients vulnerable to invasive fungal infections. Recipients of alternate donor transplants are especially susceptible due to slow reconstitution of cell mediated immunity.

Fluconazole prophylaxis in prospective randomized trials of both autologous and allogeneic transplant recipients has been demonstrated to reduce invasive fungal infections due to yeasts prior to engraftment. A prolonged course of fluconazole given during the first 75 days (to cover the early post-engraftment period of risk) is highly effective in the prevention of early and later yeast infections. This has translated into a survival benefit. A recent analysis of long-term outcomes of these individuals demonstrated a continuing benefit beyond the course of prophylaxis with a further benefit in survival. In another study of various factors associated with survival after matched unrelated donor transplants, fluconazole prophylaxis was an independent predictor for overall survival in a multivariate analysis. Fluconazole prophylaxis has been found to be effective and safe with few substantive drug interactions and has been widely adopted by transplant clinicians.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, prospective, comparative study of fluconazole versus voriconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in allogeneic hematopoietic transplant recipients and cord blood recipients in children under the age of 12. Prior to the start of the pre-transplant conditioning regimen, participants will give written informed consent and be screened for eligibility. Participants who meet all entry criteria will be assigned randomly to voriconazole or fluconazole within 72 hours of Day 0. Participants will begin the study drug on Day 0 (after completion of the conditioning regimen). Day 0 is defined as the day infusion of the stem cell product is completed. The study drug will be continued until Day 100 following transplant or until one or more criteria for early withdrawal are met. Continuation of the study drug beyond Day 100 is permitted for participants who meet specific criteria. The development of any fungal infection during prophylaxis will be classified according to the definitions listed in the protocol.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymphoma Infection Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fluconazole

The dose of fluconazole is 400 mg by mouth or intravenous drip.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fluconazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Fluconazole will be administered orally once daily. Fluconazole capsules should be taken at least one hour before or one hour after a meal. If oral drug is not possible, it will be given intravenously once daily in a total volume of 200 mL in patients \> 12 years. For adults, each 200 mL infusion will be administered over 2 hours. In patients \< 12 years, intravenous doses will be prepared.

Voriconazole

The dose of oral voriconazole is 200 mg twice daily. When voriconazole must be given intravenously, it will be given at a dose of 200 mg every 12 hours for the duration of intravenous therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Voriconazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Voriconazole will be administered orally twice daily. Voriconazole capsules should be taken at least one hour before or one hour after a meal. Taken concomitantly with food, bioavailability of voriconazole is reduced. If oral drug is not possible, it will be given intravenously at a dosage of 200 mg every 12 hours over two hours in patients \> 12 years. Each voriconazole dose will be diluted to a total volume of 200 mL in patients \> 12 years. Volumes of the formulation required to provide 4 mg/kg doses for children age \< 12 years.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fluconazole

Fluconazole will be administered orally once daily. Fluconazole capsules should be taken at least one hour before or one hour after a meal. If oral drug is not possible, it will be given intravenously once daily in a total volume of 200 mL in patients \> 12 years. For adults, each 200 mL infusion will be administered over 2 hours. In patients \< 12 years, intravenous doses will be prepared.

Intervention Type DRUG

Voriconazole

Voriconazole will be administered orally twice daily. Voriconazole capsules should be taken at least one hour before or one hour after a meal. Taken concomitantly with food, bioavailability of voriconazole is reduced. If oral drug is not possible, it will be given intravenously at a dosage of 200 mg every 12 hours over two hours in patients \> 12 years. Each voriconazole dose will be diluted to a total volume of 200 mL in patients \> 12 years. Volumes of the formulation required to provide 4 mg/kg doses for children age \< 12 years.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Diflucan Vfend

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must receive an allogeneic peripheral blood or marrow transplant from a family or unrelated donor, or for children under the age of 12, a cord blood transplant from either a sibling or other donor
* Must have a 5 or 6 of 6 human leukocyte antigens (HLA)-matched donor. The match may be determined at serologic level for HLA-A and HLA-B loci. For sibling donors, matching may be determined at serologic level for HLA-DR; for unrelated donors, matching for HLA-DRB1 must be at the high-resolution molecular level
* Must have one of the following underlying diseases:

1. Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)
2. Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL)
3. Acute undifferentiated leukemia (AUL)
4. Acute biphenotypic leukemia in first or second complete remission
5. Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in either chronic or accelerated phase
6. One of the following myelodysplastic syndrome(s) (MDS):

1. Refractory anemia
2. Refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts
3. Refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia
4. Refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia and ringed sideroblasts
5. Refractory anemia with excess blasts-1 (5-10% blasts)
6. Refractory anemia with excess blasts-2 (10-20% blasts)
7. MDS, unclassified
8. MDS associated with isolated del (5q)
9. Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)
7. Lymphoma (including Hodgkin's) with chemosensitive disease (at least 50% response to chemotherapy) and receiving a related donor transplant
* Receiving myeloablative conditioning regimens
* Adequate physical function (cardiac, hepatic, renal, and pulmonary), within 6 weeks of initiation of conditioning (preferably within 4 weeks) unless otherwise specified
* Baseline galactomannan blood samples drawn within 30 days prior to randomization with the results available prior to randomization (72 hours prior to transplant)
* Chest computed tomography (CT) scans within 6 weeks prior to randomization if the results of the baseline galactomannan blood sample are not available prior to randomization (72 hours prior to transplant)

Exclusion Criteria

* Invasive yeast infection within the 8 weeks prior to conditioning regimen initiation. Patients are eligible if colonized or have had superficial infection. Patients with a history of candidemia greater than 8 weeks prior to conditioning must have a negative blood culture within 14 days of conditioning (within 7 days is recommended), no clinical signs of candidemia, and may not still require antifungal therapy
* Presumptive, proven, or probable aspergillus or other mold infection or deep mycoses (including hepatosplenic candidiasis) within 4 months prior to conditioning regimen initiation
* Uncontrolled viral or bacterial infection at the time of study registration
* Pregnant or breastfeeding. Women of child-bearing age must avoid becoming pregnant while receiving antifungal agents
* Karnofsky performance status less than 70% or Lansky status less than 50% for patients under 16 years old unless approved by the medical monitor or protocol chair
* History of allergy or intolerance to azoles (e.g., fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole, clotrimazole)
* Requiring therapy with rifampin, rifabutin, carbamazepine, cisapride (Propulsid®), terfenadine (Seldane®), astemizole (Hismanal®), ergot alkaloids, long-acting barbiturates, or who have received more than 3 days treatment with rifampin or carbamazepine within 7 days prior to conditioning regimen initiation. Patients on therapeutic anticoagulation with coumadin (1 mg/day for port prophylaxis is permitted)
* Receiving sirolimus
* Prolonged QTc syndrome at study entry
* HIV positive
* Receiving another investigational drug unless cleared by the medical monitors
* Received a prior allogeneic or autologous transplant
* Active central nervous system disease
* On fungal prophylaxis during conditioning regimen (it is recommended that fungal prophylaxis be suspended once patient is enrolled)
* Prior cancer, other than resected basal cell carcinoma or treated carcinoma in-situ. Cancer treated with curative intent less than 5 years previously will not be allowed unless approved by the medical monitor or protocol chair. Cancer previously treated with curative intent over 5 years ago will be allowed
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Marrow Donor Program

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical College of Wisconsin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mary Horowitz, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

UCSD Medical Center

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford Hospital and Clinics

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Children's National Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

University of Florida College of Medicine (Shands)

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indiana University Medical Center

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins/SKCCC

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham & Womens

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Children's Hospital of Boston

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan Medical Center

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Karmanos Cancer Institute/BMT

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kansas City Cancer Centers

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington University/Barnes Jewish Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington University/St. Louis Children's Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Hackensack University Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

University Hospitals of Cleveland/Case Western

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oregon Health Sciences University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Texas/MD Anderson CRC

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Transplant Institute

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Utah BMT/Univ of Utah Med School

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wingard JR, Carter SL, Walsh TJ, Kurtzberg J, Small TN, Baden LR, Gersten ID, Mendizabal AM, Leather HL, Confer DL, Maziarz RT, Stadtmauer EA, Bolanos-Meade J, Brown J, Dipersio JF, Boeckh M, Marr KA; Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network. Randomized, double-blind trial of fluconazole versus voriconazole for prevention of invasive fungal infection after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2010 Dec 9;116(24):5111-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-268151. Epub 2010 Sep 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20826719 (View on PubMed)

Mauskopf J, Chirila C, Graham J, Gersten ID, Leather H, Maziarz RT, Baden LR, Bolanos-Meade J, Brown JM, Walsh TJ, Horowitz MH, Kurtzberg J, Marr KA, Wingard JR. Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of voriconazole and fluconazole for prevention of invasive fungal infection in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Sep 1;70(17):1518-27. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120599.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23943184 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BMT CTN 0101

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U01HL069294

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

5U24CA076518

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

BMTCTN0101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT00322088

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.