Comparison of IV Topotecan/Docetaxel to Docetaxel Alone in Second-Line Stage IIIB/IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00065182
Last Updated: 2019-06-24
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
399 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-08-14
2007-08-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Oral Topotecan Versus Docetaxel in Second-Line Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00193245
Trial of Weekly Taxotere and Irinotecan (CPT-11) in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00819728
Chemotherapy/Radiotherapy Versus Concomitant Chemotherapy Followed by Radiotherapy in Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT01652820
Docetaxel and Gemcitabine in Treating Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00003762
Weekly Topotecan With Docetaxel in Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT00315211
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Topotecan/Docetaxel combination
Docetaxel
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least 18 years old
* Confirmed advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)
* Received one prior chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC excluding TAXOTERE or HYCAMTIN. In addition, subjects are allowed to have previously received a non-cytotoxic therapy, such as an endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) or angiogenesis inhibitor.
* Presence of either measurable or non-measurable disease by radiologic study or physical examination.
* Full recovery and at least 21 days from prior treatment for NSCLC; 42 days from treatment with mitomycin or nitrosureas and 30 days from prior non-cytotoxic therapy.
* At least 3 weeks since last major surgery (a lesser period is acceptable if deemed in the best interest of the patient).
* At least 7 days since prior radiotherapy.
* A probable life expectance of at least 3 months.
* Adequate bone marrow reserve, CBC/Platelet, kidney and liver function.
Exclusion Criteria
* Symptoms of brain metastases requiring treatment with steroids.
* Active infection.
* Severe medical problems other than the diagnosis of NSCLC that would limit the ability of the subject to follow study guidelines or expose the subject to extreme risk.
* Ongoing or planned chemotherapy (other than treatment during this study), immunotherapy, radiotherapy, or investigational therapy for the treatment of NSCLC.
* Use of investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives prior to the first dose of study medication.
* Women who are pregnant or lactating.
* Subjects of child-bearing potential refusing to practice adequate contraception.
* Prior treatment with or history of allergic reaction to either HYCAMTIN or TAXOTERE.
* Subjects who cannot receive steroid premedication.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GlaxoSmithKline
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
GSK Clinical Trials
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
GlaxoSmithKline
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
GSK Investigational Site
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Mobile, Alabama, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Fresno, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Poway, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Lakeland, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Miami Shores, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Orange Park, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Stuart, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Columbus, Georgia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Decatur, Illinois, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Skokie, Illinois, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Urbana, Illinois, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Bowling Green, Kentucky, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Lafayette, Louisiana, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Frederick, Maryland, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Robbinsdale, Minnesota, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Springfield, Missouri, United States
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Reno, Nevada, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Buffalo, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
East Syracuse, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Manhasset, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
New Hyde Park, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Nyack, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Rochester, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
The Bronx, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Canton, Ohio, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Dunmore, Pennsylvania, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Irving, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tyler, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Abingdon, Virginia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Spokane, Washington, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tacoma, Washington, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Sheboygan, Wisconsin, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Casper, Wyoming, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
London, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Weston, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Lévis, Quebec, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Kielce, , Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Krakow, , Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Olsztyn, , Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Poznan, , Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Szczecin Zdunowo 20, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2004-002892-17
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
104864/615
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.