Trial Outcomes & Findings for Expectation of Unpleasant Events in Anxiety Disorders (NCT NCT00055224)

NCT ID: NCT00055224

Last Updated: 2024-01-09

Results Overview

Following tasks completion, participants provided retrospective ratings of: anxiety and attention during safe and threat conditions using an analog scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). Participants rated overall subjective difficulty with attention ('How difficult was it to pay attention during threat/safe?') and level of anxiety ('How anxious were you during threat/safe?'). Retrospective ratings of anxiety and difficulty with attention were analyzed with two way Diagnosis x Condition (safe, threat) ANOVA.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

921 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Assessed immediately after completing the affective Stroop task

Results posted on

2024-01-09

Participant Flow

921 participants were consented and performed one or more tasks. 3 participated did not perform any study related tasks.

All sub-studies were conducted at different time points so subjects had the option to participate in multiple sub-studies.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Healthy Participants
Substudy 1/ Neutral, Predictable, and Unpredictable Responses: This experiment examined physiological responses including startle reflex to different threat of shock conditions (neutral (N)- no shock, unpredictable - shock at any time, and predictable -cued shock (P)). Each of these conditions were signaled by a written text displayed on a computer monitor (e.g., shock only when blue square present). Substudy 2/ Working Memory Task: Subjects performed a working memory task in two conditions, under threat of shock and in safety (no threat of shock). Substudy 5 /Face Stroop Task: Stimuli were pictures of faces exhibiting anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness and surprise. Intermixed with the faces were pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures. Subjects indicated which emotion the face displayed. Accurate response was used as measure of facial emotion recognition. Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance and Sustained Attention Tasks: In the active avoidance signal task (AAST), participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses. In the sustained attention response task (SART), participants were presented with stimuli and either initiated a response (i.e. "go") or inhibited their response (i.e. "stop") based on what stimuli were presented. Pilot Tasks: Participants completed one/more task: nerve stimulation, short speech, air burst, saliva samples, squeezer task, virtual reality task, or computer-based task.
Anxiety Subjects
Substudy 1/ Neutral, Predictable, and Unpredictable Responses: This experiment examined physiological responses including startle reflex to different threat of shock conditions (neutral (N)- no shock, unpredictable - shock at any time, and predictable -cued shock (P)). Each of these conditions were signaled by a written text displayed on a computer monitor (e.g., shock only when blue square present). Substudy 2/ Working Memory Task: Subjects performed a working memory task in two conditions, under threat of shock and in safety (no threat of shock). Substudy 5 /Face Stroop Task: Stimuli were pictures of faces exhibiting anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness and surprise. Intermixed with the faces were pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures. Subjects indicated which emotion the face displayed. Accurate response was used as measure of facial emotion recognition. Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance and Sustained Attention Tasks: In the active avoidance signal task (AAST), participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses. In the sustained attention response task (SART), participants were presented with stimuli and either initiated a response (i.e. "go") or inhibited their response (i.e. "stop") based on what stimuli were presented. Pilot Tasks: Participants completed one/more task: nerve stimulation, short speech, air burst, saliva samples, squeezer task, virtual reality task, or computer-based task.
Overall Study Participants
STARTED
557
361
Overall Study Participants
COMPLETED
557
361
Overall Study Participants
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
Substudy 1
STARTED
23
78
Substudy 1
COMPLETED
23
78
Substudy 1
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
Substudy 2
STARTED
42
35
Substudy 2
COMPLETED
42
35
Substudy 2
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
Substudy 5
STARTED
33
36
Substudy 5
COMPLETED
33
36
Substudy 5
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
Substudy 7
STARTED
65
91
Substudy 7
COMPLETED
65
91
Substudy 7
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
Pilot Tasks
STARTED
406
183
Pilot Tasks
COMPLETED
406
183
Pilot Tasks
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Substudy 1/ Neutral, Predictable, and Unpredictable Responses
n=101 Participants
This experiment examined physiological responses including startle reflex to different threat of shock conditions (neutral (N)- no shock, unpredictable - shock at any time , and predictable -cued shock (P)) in subjects with anxiety disorders and healthy control. Each of these conditions were signaled by a written text displayed on a computer monitor (e.g., shock only when blue square present).
Substudy 2/Working Memory Task
n=76 Participants
Subjects performed a working memory task in two conditions, under threat of shock and in safety (no threat of shock). Subjects included participants with anxiety disorder and healthy volunteer.
Substudy 5/Face Stroop Task
n=62 Participants
Stimuli were pictures of faces exhibiting anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness and surprise (Ekman, 1993). Intermixed with the faces were pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures. Subjects indicated which emotion the face displayed. Accurate response was used as measure of facial emotion recognition. Subjects included participants with anxiety disorder and healthy volunteer.
Substudy 7/Active Avoidance and Sustained Attention Tasks
n=90 Participants
In the active avoidance signal task (AAST), participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses. In the sustained attention response task (SART), participants were presented with stimuli and either initiated a response (i.e. "go") or inhibited their response (i.e. "stop") based on what stimuli were presented. Subjects included participants with anxiety disorder and healthy volunteer.
Pilot Task
n=589 Participants
Participants completed one or more pilot tasks: nerve stimulation, short speech in front of a small audience or in a virtual environment, burst of air to neck, provide saliva samples for cortisol analysis, squeeze a grip device, virtual reality task, and/or computer based experimental tasks.
Total
n=918 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
Healthy participants · <=18 years
0 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Age, Categorical
Healthy participants · Between 18 and 65 years
23 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
42 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
30 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
56 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
406 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
557 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Age, Categorical
Healthy participants · >=65 years
0 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Age, Categorical
Anxiety Subjects · <=18 years
0 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Age, Categorical
Anxiety Subjects · Between 18 and 65 years
78 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
34 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
32 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
34 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
183 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
361 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Age, Categorical
Anxiety Subjects · >=65 years
0 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Sex: Female, Male
Healthy Participants · Female
13 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
28 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
25 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
43 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
236 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
345 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Sex: Female, Male
Healthy Participants · Male
10 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
14 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
5 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
13 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
170 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
212 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Sex: Female, Male
Anxiety Patients · Female
54 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
30 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
28 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
16 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
116 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
244 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Sex: Female, Male
Anxiety Patients · Male
24 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
4 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
4 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
18 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
67 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
117 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
5 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
6 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
36 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
49 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
36 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
30 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
49 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
359 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
495 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
1 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
1 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
11 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
13 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
6 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
1 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
2 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
20 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
34 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · Not Hispanic or Latino
71 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
27 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
31 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
32 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
159 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
320 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
1 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
4 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
7 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
2 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
2 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · Asian
5 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
7 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
6 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
5 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
39 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
62 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
2 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
2 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · Black or African American
7 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
8 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
5 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
20 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
79 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
119 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · White
9 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
21 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
17 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
25 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
245 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
317 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · More than one race
0 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
3 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
2 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
3 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
10 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
18 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
3 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
3 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
29 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
37 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
2 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · Asian
7 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
5 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
2 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
2 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
11 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
27 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
1 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
1 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · Black or African American
25 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
8 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
6 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
4 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
36 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
79 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · White
34 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
17 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
21 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
26 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
110 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
208 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · More than one race
6 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
3 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
1 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
1 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
6 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
17 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
1 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
2 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
1 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
19 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
27 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2000 ms during trial

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the active avoidance signal task (AAST). Two healthy controls were excluded from analyses.

Subjects participated in go/no go (GNG) task condition during periods of threat of shocks and periods of safety when no shock could be administered. During the GNG stimuli were presented on a monitor. In the GNG task, participants were asked to respond to frequent 'go' stimuli ('=') by pressing the '2' on the keypad of a computer keyboard and to withhold their response to infrequent 'nogo' stimuli ('O'). Stimuli were randomly distributed. A correct go hit was a response recorded during these 2000 ms to a go trial. Similarly, a correct nogo omission was a no response during the same period to a nogo trial. Performance was determined for each condition (threat, safe) and trial type (go, nogo) by dividing the number of correct responses by the total number of each trial type. Improvement in accuracy was measured as a higher percent of correct button presses during threat compared to safety.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=22 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=23 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Change in Percent of Correct Button Presses During Threat Compared to the Safe Condition (AAST)
-0.016 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.03
0.008 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.04

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2000 ms during trial

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the active avoidance signal task (AAST). Two healthy controls were excluded from analyses.

Subjects participated in go/no go (GNG) task condition during periods of threat of shocks and periods of safety when no shock could be administered. During the GNG stimuli were presented on a monitor. In the GNG task, participants were asked to respond to frequent 'go' stimuli ('=') by pressing the '2' on the keypad of a computer keyboard and to withhold their response to infrequent 'nogo' stimuli ('O'). Stimuli were randomly distributed. A correct go hit was a response recorded during these 2000 ms to a go trial. Similarly, a correct nogo omission was a no response during the same period to a nogo trial. Performance was determined for each condition (threat, safe) and trial type (go, nogo) by dividing the number of correct responses by the total number of each trial type. Improvement in accuracy was measured as a higher percent of correct button presses during threat compared to safety.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=22 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=23 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Change in Percent of Correct no Button Presses During Threat Compared to the Safe Condition
-0.002 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.03
0.028 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.04

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2000 ms during trial

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the Sustained attention response task (SART).

Correct go responses were go trials followed by button press. Reaction time (RT) is the time it takes to respond to stimuli. Participants RTs were measured while undergoing alternating periods of safety and shock threat conditions i.e. while anticipating unpleasant electric shocks (threat) or no shock (safe). Mean reaction time (RT) was calculated for correct-go to evaluate speed-accuracy trade-off.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Correct-go Reaction Time (RT) - Safe Condition
387.8 milliseconds (ms)
Standard Error 16.2
337.3 milliseconds (ms)
Standard Error 10.7

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2000 ms during trial

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the Sustained attention response task (SART).

Correct go responses were go trials followed by button press. Reaction time (RT) is the time it takes to respond to stimuli. Participants RTs were measured while undergoing alternating periods of safety and shock threat conditions i.e. while anticipating unpleasant electric shocks (threat) or no shock (safe). Mean reaction time (RT) was calculated for correct-go to evaluate speed-accuracy trade-off.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Correct-go Reaction Time (RT) - Threat Condition
377.4 milliseconds (ms)
Standard Error 14.7
332.2 milliseconds (ms)
Standard Error 10.9

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2000 ms during trial

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the Sustained attention response task (SART).

Subjects participated in go/no go (GNG) task condition during periods of threat of shocks and periods of safety when no shock could be administered. During the GNG stimuli were presented on a monitor. In the GNG task, participants were asked to respond to frequent 'go' stimuli ('=') by pressing the '2' on the keypad of a computer keyboard and to withhold their response to infrequent 'nogo' stimuli ('O'). Stimuli were randomly distributed. A correct go hit was a response recorded during these 2000 ms to a go trial. Similarly, a correct nogo omission was a no response during the same period to a nogo trial. Performance was determined for each condition (threat, safe) and trial type (go, nogo) by dividing the number of correct response by the total number of each trial type.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Go Correct Hits Followed by Button Press - Safe Condition
0.91 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.01
0.87 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.01

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2000 ms during trial

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the sustained attention response task (SART).

Subjects participated in go/no go (GNG) task condition during periods of threat of shocks and periods of safety when no shock could be administered. During the GNG stimuli were presented on a monitor. In the GNG task, participants were asked to respond to frequent (91%) 'go' stimuli ('=') by pressing the '2' on the keypad of a computer keyboard and to withhold their response to infrequent (9%) 'nogo' stimuli ('O'). Stimuli were randomly distributed. A correct go hit was a response recorded during these 2000 ms to a go trial. Similarly, a correct nogo omission was a no response during the same period to a nogo trial. Performance was determined for each condition (threat, safe) and trial type (go, nogo) by dividing the number of correct response by the total number of each trial type.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Go Correct Hits Followed by Button Press - Threat Condition
0.9 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.01
0.87 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.02

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2000 ms during trial

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the sustained attention response task (SART).

Subjects participated in go/no go (GNG) task condition during periods of threat of shocks and periods of safety when no shock could be administered. During the GNG stimuli were presented on a monitor. In the GNG task, participants were asked to respond to frequent 'go' stimuli ('=') by pressing the '2' on the keypad of a computer keyboard and to withhold their response to infrequent 'nogo' stimuli ('O'). Stimuli were randomly distributed. A correct go hit was a response recorded during these 2000 ms to a go trial. Similarly, a correct nogo omission was a no response during the same period to a nogo trial. Performance was determined for each condition (threat, safe) and trial type (go, nogo) by dividing the number of correct response by the total number of each trial type.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Nogo Trials Followed by no Button Press - Safe Condition
0.76 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.02
0.76 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.01

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2000 ms during trial

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the sustained attention response task (SART).

Subjects participated in go/no go (GNG) task condition during periods of threat of shocks and periods of safety when no shock could be administered. During the GNG stimuli were presented on a monitor. In the GNG task, participants were asked to respond to frequent 'go' stimuli ('=') by pressing the '2' on the keypad of a computer keyboard and to withhold their response to infrequent 'nogo' stimuli ('O'). Stimuli were randomly distributed. A correct go hit was a response recorded during these 2000 ms to a go trial. Similarly, a correct nogo omission was a no response during the same period to a nogo trial. Performance was determined for each condition (threat, safe) and trial type (go, nogo) by dividing the number of correct response by the total number of each trial type.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Nogo Trials Followed by no Button Press - Threat Condition
0.8 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.02
0.81 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.02

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutes

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task.

Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Congruent Task Viewing Positive Images: Safe Condition
93.9 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8
95.7 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.7

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutes

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.

Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Congruent Task Viewing Positive Images: Threat Condition
94.9 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.9
96.0 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutes

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.

Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Congruent Task Viewing Negative Images: Safe Condition
94.3 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 1.1
94.3 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutes

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.

Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Congruent Task Viewing Negative Images: Threat Condition
95.3 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.7
95.9 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutes

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.

Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Congruent Task Viewing Neutral Images: Safe Condition
94.9 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8
95.1 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutes

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.

Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Congruent Task Viewing Neutral Images: Threat Condition
96.2 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8
96.7 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.5

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutes

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.

Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Incongruent Task Viewing Positive Images: Safe Condition
94.1 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 1
96.5 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.6

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutes

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.

Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Incongruent Task Viewing Positive Images: Threat Condition
94.3 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.9
94.1 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 1

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutes

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.

Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Incongruent Task Viewing Negative Images: Safe Condition
94.2 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.9
94.0 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.7

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutes

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.

Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Incongruent Task Viewing Negative Images: Threat Condition
95.0 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.7
95.3 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutes

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.

Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Incongruent Task Viewing Neutral Images: Safe Condition
94.4 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 1.1
94.8 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.7

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutes

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.

Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Incongruent Task Viewing Neutral Images: Threat Condition
95.8 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.7
95.8 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.7

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed immediately after completing the affective Stroop task

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.

Following tasks completion, participants provided retrospective ratings of: anxiety and attention during safe and threat conditions using an analog scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). Participants rated overall subjective difficulty with attention ('How difficult was it to pay attention during threat/safe?') and level of anxiety ('How anxious were you during threat/safe?'). Retrospective ratings of anxiety and difficulty with attention were analyzed with two way Diagnosis x Condition (safe, threat) ANOVA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Subjective Rating of Difficulty With Attention During Safe Condition
2.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
4.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.4

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed immediately after completing the affective Stroop task

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.

Following tasks completion, participants provided retrospective ratings of: anxiety and attention during safe and threat conditions using an analog scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). Participants rated overall subjective difficulty with attention ('How difficult was it to pay attention during threat/safe?') and level of anxiety ('How anxious were you during threat/safe?'). Retrospective ratings of anxiety and difficulty with attention were analyzed with two way Diagnosis x Condition (safe, threat) ANOVA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Subjective Rating of Difficulty With Attention During Threat Condition
4.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
6.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.4

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed immediately after completing the affective Stroop task

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.

Following tasks completion, participants provided retrospective ratings of: anxiety and attention during safe and threat conditions using an analog scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). Participants rated overall subjective difficulty with attention ('How difficult was it to pay attention during threat/safe?') and level of anxiety ('How anxious were you during threat/safe?'). Retrospective ratings of anxiety and difficulty with attention were analyzed with two way Diagnosis x Condition (safe, threat) ANOVA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Subjective Rating of Level of Anxiety During Safe Condition
2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
3.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.4

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed immediately after completing the affective Stroop task

Population: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.

Following tasks completion, participants provided retrospective ratings of: anxiety and attention during safe and threat conditions using an analog scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). Participants rated overall subjective difficulty with attention ('How difficult was it to pay attention during threat/safe?') and level of anxiety ('How anxious were you during threat/safe?'). Retrospective ratings of anxiety and difficulty with attention were analyzed with two way Diagnosis x Condition (safe, threat) ANOVA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
Subjective Rating of Level of Anxiety During Threat Condition
6.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
8.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.3

Adverse Events

Substudy 1/ Neutral, Predictable, and Unpredictable Responses - Healthy Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Substudy 1/ Neutral, Predictable, and Unpredictable Responses - Anxiety Subjects

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Substudy 2/Working Memory Task - Healthy Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Substudy 2/Working Memory Task - Anxiety Subjects

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Substudy 5/Face Stroop Task - Healthy Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Substudy 5/Face Stroop Task - Anxiety Subjects

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Substudy 7/Active Avoidance and Sustained Attention Tasks - Healthy Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Substudy 7/Active Avoidance and Sustained Attention Tasks - Anxiety Subjects

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Pilot Tasks - Healthy Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Pilot Tasks - Anxiety Subjects

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr Maryland Pao

National Institute of Mental Health

Phone: (301) 435 5770

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place