Trial Outcomes & Findings for Expectation of Unpleasant Events in Anxiety Disorders (NCT NCT00055224)
NCT ID: NCT00055224
Last Updated: 2024-01-09
Results Overview
Following tasks completion, participants provided retrospective ratings of: anxiety and attention during safe and threat conditions using an analog scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). Participants rated overall subjective difficulty with attention ('How difficult was it to pay attention during threat/safe?') and level of anxiety ('How anxious were you during threat/safe?'). Retrospective ratings of anxiety and difficulty with attention were analyzed with two way Diagnosis x Condition (safe, threat) ANOVA.
COMPLETED
NA
921 participants
Assessed immediately after completing the affective Stroop task
2024-01-09
Participant Flow
921 participants were consented and performed one or more tasks. 3 participated did not perform any study related tasks.
All sub-studies were conducted at different time points so subjects had the option to participate in multiple sub-studies.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Healthy Participants
Substudy 1/ Neutral, Predictable, and Unpredictable Responses: This experiment examined physiological responses including startle reflex to different threat of shock conditions (neutral (N)- no shock, unpredictable - shock at any time, and predictable -cued shock (P)). Each of these conditions were signaled by a written text displayed on a computer monitor (e.g., shock only when blue square present).
Substudy 2/ Working Memory Task: Subjects performed a working memory task in two conditions, under threat of shock and in safety (no threat of shock).
Substudy 5 /Face Stroop Task: Stimuli were pictures of faces exhibiting anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness and surprise. Intermixed with the faces were pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures. Subjects indicated which emotion the face displayed. Accurate response was used as measure of facial emotion recognition.
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance and Sustained Attention Tasks: In the active avoidance signal task (AAST), participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses. In the sustained attention response task (SART), participants were presented with stimuli and either initiated a response (i.e. "go") or inhibited their response (i.e. "stop") based on what stimuli were presented.
Pilot Tasks: Participants completed one/more task: nerve stimulation, short speech, air burst, saliva samples, squeezer task, virtual reality task, or computer-based task.
|
Anxiety Subjects
Substudy 1/ Neutral, Predictable, and Unpredictable Responses: This experiment examined physiological responses including startle reflex to different threat of shock conditions (neutral (N)- no shock, unpredictable - shock at any time, and predictable -cued shock (P)). Each of these conditions were signaled by a written text displayed on a computer monitor (e.g., shock only when blue square present).
Substudy 2/ Working Memory Task: Subjects performed a working memory task in two conditions, under threat of shock and in safety (no threat of shock).
Substudy 5 /Face Stroop Task: Stimuli were pictures of faces exhibiting anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness and surprise. Intermixed with the faces were pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures. Subjects indicated which emotion the face displayed. Accurate response was used as measure of facial emotion recognition.
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance and Sustained Attention Tasks: In the active avoidance signal task (AAST), participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses. In the sustained attention response task (SART), participants were presented with stimuli and either initiated a response (i.e. "go") or inhibited their response (i.e. "stop") based on what stimuli were presented.
Pilot Tasks: Participants completed one/more task: nerve stimulation, short speech, air burst, saliva samples, squeezer task, virtual reality task, or computer-based task.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study Participants
STARTED
|
557
|
361
|
|
Overall Study Participants
COMPLETED
|
557
|
361
|
|
Overall Study Participants
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Substudy 1
STARTED
|
23
|
78
|
|
Substudy 1
COMPLETED
|
23
|
78
|
|
Substudy 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Substudy 2
STARTED
|
42
|
35
|
|
Substudy 2
COMPLETED
|
42
|
35
|
|
Substudy 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Substudy 5
STARTED
|
33
|
36
|
|
Substudy 5
COMPLETED
|
33
|
36
|
|
Substudy 5
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Substudy 7
STARTED
|
65
|
91
|
|
Substudy 7
COMPLETED
|
65
|
91
|
|
Substudy 7
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Pilot Tasks
STARTED
|
406
|
183
|
|
Pilot Tasks
COMPLETED
|
406
|
183
|
|
Pilot Tasks
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Substudy 1/ Neutral, Predictable, and Unpredictable Responses
n=101 Participants
This experiment examined physiological responses including startle reflex to different threat of shock conditions (neutral (N)- no shock, unpredictable - shock at any time , and predictable -cued shock (P)) in subjects with anxiety disorders and healthy control. Each of these conditions were signaled by a written text displayed on a computer monitor (e.g., shock only when blue square present).
|
Substudy 2/Working Memory Task
n=76 Participants
Subjects performed a working memory task in two conditions, under threat of shock and in safety (no threat of shock). Subjects included participants with anxiety disorder and healthy volunteer.
|
Substudy 5/Face Stroop Task
n=62 Participants
Stimuli were pictures of faces exhibiting anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness and surprise (Ekman, 1993). Intermixed with the faces were pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures. Subjects indicated which emotion the face displayed. Accurate response was used as measure of facial emotion recognition. Subjects included participants with anxiety disorder and healthy volunteer.
|
Substudy 7/Active Avoidance and Sustained Attention Tasks
n=90 Participants
In the active avoidance signal task (AAST), participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses. In the sustained attention response task (SART), participants were presented with stimuli and either initiated a response (i.e. "go") or inhibited their response (i.e. "stop") based on what stimuli were presented. Subjects included participants with anxiety disorder and healthy volunteer.
|
Pilot Task
n=589 Participants
Participants completed one or more pilot tasks: nerve stimulation, short speech in front of a small audience or in a virtual environment, burst of air to neck, provide saliva samples for cortisol analysis, squeeze a grip device, virtual reality task, and/or computer based experimental tasks.
|
Total
n=918 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
Healthy participants · <=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Healthy participants · Between 18 and 65 years
|
23 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
42 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
30 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
56 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
406 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
557 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Healthy participants · >=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Anxiety Subjects · <=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Anxiety Subjects · Between 18 and 65 years
|
78 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
34 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
32 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
34 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
183 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
361 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Anxiety Subjects · >=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Healthy Participants · Female
|
13 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
28 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
25 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
43 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
236 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
345 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Healthy Participants · Male
|
10 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
14 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
5 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
13 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
170 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
212 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Anxiety Patients · Female
|
54 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
30 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
28 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
16 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
116 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
244 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Anxiety Patients · Male
|
24 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
4 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
4 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
18 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
67 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
117 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
5 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
6 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
36 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
49 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
21 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
36 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
30 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
49 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
359 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
495 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
1 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
1 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
11 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
13 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · Hispanic or Latino
|
5 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
6 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
1 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
2 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
20 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
34 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
71 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
27 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
31 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
32 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
159 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
320 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
1 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
4 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
7 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
2 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
2 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · Asian
|
5 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
7 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
6 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
5 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
39 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
62 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
2 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
2 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · Black or African American
|
7 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
8 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
5 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
20 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
79 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
119 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · White
|
9 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
21 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
17 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
25 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
245 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
317 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
3 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
2 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
3 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
10 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
18 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Healthy Participants · Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=23 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
3 Participants
n=42 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
3 Participants
n=56 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
29 Participants
n=406 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
37 Participants
n=557 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
2 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · Asian
|
7 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
5 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
2 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
2 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
11 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
27 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
1 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
1 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · Black or African American
|
25 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
8 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
6 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
4 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
36 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
79 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · White
|
34 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
17 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
21 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
26 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
110 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
208 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · More than one race
|
6 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
3 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
1 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
1 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
6 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
17 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Anxiety Subjects · Unknown or Not Reported
|
4 Participants
n=78 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
1 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
2 Participants
n=32 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
1 Participants
n=34 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
19 Participants
n=183 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
27 Participants
n=361 Participants • Study comprised of several sub-studies with the aim of comparing Healthy participants to Anxiety participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2000 ms during trialPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the active avoidance signal task (AAST). Two healthy controls were excluded from analyses.
Subjects participated in go/no go (GNG) task condition during periods of threat of shocks and periods of safety when no shock could be administered. During the GNG stimuli were presented on a monitor. In the GNG task, participants were asked to respond to frequent 'go' stimuli ('=') by pressing the '2' on the keypad of a computer keyboard and to withhold their response to infrequent 'nogo' stimuli ('O'). Stimuli were randomly distributed. A correct go hit was a response recorded during these 2000 ms to a go trial. Similarly, a correct nogo omission was a no response during the same period to a nogo trial. Performance was determined for each condition (threat, safe) and trial type (go, nogo) by dividing the number of correct responses by the total number of each trial type. Improvement in accuracy was measured as a higher percent of correct button presses during threat compared to safety.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=22 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=23 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Percent of Correct Button Presses During Threat Compared to the Safe Condition (AAST)
|
-0.016 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.03
|
0.008 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.04
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2000 ms during trialPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the active avoidance signal task (AAST). Two healthy controls were excluded from analyses.
Subjects participated in go/no go (GNG) task condition during periods of threat of shocks and periods of safety when no shock could be administered. During the GNG stimuli were presented on a monitor. In the GNG task, participants were asked to respond to frequent 'go' stimuli ('=') by pressing the '2' on the keypad of a computer keyboard and to withhold their response to infrequent 'nogo' stimuli ('O'). Stimuli were randomly distributed. A correct go hit was a response recorded during these 2000 ms to a go trial. Similarly, a correct nogo omission was a no response during the same period to a nogo trial. Performance was determined for each condition (threat, safe) and trial type (go, nogo) by dividing the number of correct responses by the total number of each trial type. Improvement in accuracy was measured as a higher percent of correct button presses during threat compared to safety.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=22 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=23 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Percent of Correct no Button Presses During Threat Compared to the Safe Condition
|
-0.002 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.03
|
0.028 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.04
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2000 ms during trialPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the Sustained attention response task (SART).
Correct go responses were go trials followed by button press. Reaction time (RT) is the time it takes to respond to stimuli. Participants RTs were measured while undergoing alternating periods of safety and shock threat conditions i.e. while anticipating unpleasant electric shocks (threat) or no shock (safe). Mean reaction time (RT) was calculated for correct-go to evaluate speed-accuracy trade-off.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Correct-go Reaction Time (RT) - Safe Condition
|
387.8 milliseconds (ms)
Standard Error 16.2
|
337.3 milliseconds (ms)
Standard Error 10.7
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2000 ms during trialPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the Sustained attention response task (SART).
Correct go responses were go trials followed by button press. Reaction time (RT) is the time it takes to respond to stimuli. Participants RTs were measured while undergoing alternating periods of safety and shock threat conditions i.e. while anticipating unpleasant electric shocks (threat) or no shock (safe). Mean reaction time (RT) was calculated for correct-go to evaluate speed-accuracy trade-off.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Correct-go Reaction Time (RT) - Threat Condition
|
377.4 milliseconds (ms)
Standard Error 14.7
|
332.2 milliseconds (ms)
Standard Error 10.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2000 ms during trialPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the Sustained attention response task (SART).
Subjects participated in go/no go (GNG) task condition during periods of threat of shocks and periods of safety when no shock could be administered. During the GNG stimuli were presented on a monitor. In the GNG task, participants were asked to respond to frequent 'go' stimuli ('=') by pressing the '2' on the keypad of a computer keyboard and to withhold their response to infrequent 'nogo' stimuli ('O'). Stimuli were randomly distributed. A correct go hit was a response recorded during these 2000 ms to a go trial. Similarly, a correct nogo omission was a no response during the same period to a nogo trial. Performance was determined for each condition (threat, safe) and trial type (go, nogo) by dividing the number of correct response by the total number of each trial type.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Go Correct Hits Followed by Button Press - Safe Condition
|
0.91 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.01
|
0.87 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.01
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2000 ms during trialPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the sustained attention response task (SART).
Subjects participated in go/no go (GNG) task condition during periods of threat of shocks and periods of safety when no shock could be administered. During the GNG stimuli were presented on a monitor. In the GNG task, participants were asked to respond to frequent (91%) 'go' stimuli ('=') by pressing the '2' on the keypad of a computer keyboard and to withhold their response to infrequent (9%) 'nogo' stimuli ('O'). Stimuli were randomly distributed. A correct go hit was a response recorded during these 2000 ms to a go trial. Similarly, a correct nogo omission was a no response during the same period to a nogo trial. Performance was determined for each condition (threat, safe) and trial type (go, nogo) by dividing the number of correct response by the total number of each trial type.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Go Correct Hits Followed by Button Press - Threat Condition
|
0.9 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.01
|
0.87 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.02
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2000 ms during trialPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the sustained attention response task (SART).
Subjects participated in go/no go (GNG) task condition during periods of threat of shocks and periods of safety when no shock could be administered. During the GNG stimuli were presented on a monitor. In the GNG task, participants were asked to respond to frequent 'go' stimuli ('=') by pressing the '2' on the keypad of a computer keyboard and to withhold their response to infrequent 'nogo' stimuli ('O'). Stimuli were randomly distributed. A correct go hit was a response recorded during these 2000 ms to a go trial. Similarly, a correct nogo omission was a no response during the same period to a nogo trial. Performance was determined for each condition (threat, safe) and trial type (go, nogo) by dividing the number of correct response by the total number of each trial type.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nogo Trials Followed by no Button Press - Safe Condition
|
0.76 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.02
|
0.76 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.01
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2000 ms during trialPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 7 who completed the sustained attention response task (SART).
Subjects participated in go/no go (GNG) task condition during periods of threat of shocks and periods of safety when no shock could be administered. During the GNG stimuli were presented on a monitor. In the GNG task, participants were asked to respond to frequent 'go' stimuli ('=') by pressing the '2' on the keypad of a computer keyboard and to withhold their response to infrequent 'nogo' stimuli ('O'). Stimuli were randomly distributed. A correct go hit was a response recorded during these 2000 ms to a go trial. Similarly, a correct nogo omission was a no response during the same period to a nogo trial. Performance was determined for each condition (threat, safe) and trial type (go, nogo) by dividing the number of correct response by the total number of each trial type.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=41 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nogo Trials Followed by no Button Press - Threat Condition
|
0.8 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.02
|
0.81 Proportion of correct responses
Standard Error 0.02
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutesPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task.
Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Congruent Task Viewing Positive Images: Safe Condition
|
93.9 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8
|
95.7 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.7
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutesPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.
Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Congruent Task Viewing Positive Images: Threat Condition
|
94.9 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.9
|
96.0 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutesPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.
Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Congruent Task Viewing Negative Images: Safe Condition
|
94.3 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 1.1
|
94.3 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutesPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.
Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Congruent Task Viewing Negative Images: Threat Condition
|
95.3 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.7
|
95.9 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutesPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.
Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Congruent Task Viewing Neutral Images: Safe Condition
|
94.9 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8
|
95.1 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutesPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.
Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Congruent Task Viewing Neutral Images: Threat Condition
|
96.2 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8
|
96.7 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutesPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.
Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Incongruent Task Viewing Positive Images: Safe Condition
|
94.1 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 1
|
96.5 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.6
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutesPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.
Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Incongruent Task Viewing Positive Images: Threat Condition
|
94.3 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.9
|
94.1 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutesPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.
Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Incongruent Task Viewing Negative Images: Safe Condition
|
94.2 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.9
|
94.0 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.7
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutesPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.
Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Incongruent Task Viewing Negative Images: Threat Condition
|
95.0 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.7
|
95.3 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.8
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutesPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.
Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Incongruent Task Viewing Neutral Images: Safe Condition
|
94.4 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 1.1
|
94.8 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.7
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 11.2 minutes per run for a total of 22.4 minutesPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.
Participants watched as six trial types differing by congruence and emotion (negative, neutral, positive) were presented during condition blocks (safe, threat) on a computer screen. Each trial began with a fixation point which was then immediately followed by a picture stimulus, followed by a numerical display, followed by a repeat of the picture stimulus, and followed by a blank screen. During threat, a participant could receive a shock. During safe, a participant could not receive a shock. The effect of accuracy on congruence across negative, positive, and neutral images in threat and safe conditions was assessed by participants accurate identification of facial expression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stroop Effect on Accuracy During Incongruent Task Viewing Neutral Images: Threat Condition
|
95.8 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.7
|
95.8 Percentage of accurate responses
Standard Error 0.7
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed immediately after completing the affective Stroop taskPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.
Following tasks completion, participants provided retrospective ratings of: anxiety and attention during safe and threat conditions using an analog scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). Participants rated overall subjective difficulty with attention ('How difficult was it to pay attention during threat/safe?') and level of anxiety ('How anxious were you during threat/safe?'). Retrospective ratings of anxiety and difficulty with attention were analyzed with two way Diagnosis x Condition (safe, threat) ANOVA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Rating of Difficulty With Attention During Safe Condition
|
2.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
|
4.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed immediately after completing the affective Stroop taskPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.
Following tasks completion, participants provided retrospective ratings of: anxiety and attention during safe and threat conditions using an analog scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). Participants rated overall subjective difficulty with attention ('How difficult was it to pay attention during threat/safe?') and level of anxiety ('How anxious were you during threat/safe?'). Retrospective ratings of anxiety and difficulty with attention were analyzed with two way Diagnosis x Condition (safe, threat) ANOVA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Rating of Difficulty With Attention During Threat Condition
|
4.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
6.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed immediately after completing the affective Stroop taskPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.
Following tasks completion, participants provided retrospective ratings of: anxiety and attention during safe and threat conditions using an analog scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). Participants rated overall subjective difficulty with attention ('How difficult was it to pay attention during threat/safe?') and level of anxiety ('How anxious were you during threat/safe?'). Retrospective ratings of anxiety and difficulty with attention were analyzed with two way Diagnosis x Condition (safe, threat) ANOVA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Rating of Level of Anxiety During Safe Condition
|
2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
|
3.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed immediately after completing the affective Stroop taskPopulation: Analysis included only participants in sub-study 5 who completed the face stroop task. Two participants were excluded from the final analysis.
Following tasks completion, participants provided retrospective ratings of: anxiety and attention during safe and threat conditions using an analog scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 10 (extremely). Participants rated overall subjective difficulty with attention ('How difficult was it to pay attention during threat/safe?') and level of anxiety ('How anxious were you during threat/safe?'). Retrospective ratings of anxiety and difficulty with attention were analyzed with two way Diagnosis x Condition (safe, threat) ANOVA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Healthy Participants
n=31 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
Substudy 7/ Active Avoidance Signal Task (AAST) - Anxiety Patients
n=36 Participants
Participants performed paradigms which tested whether threat impacts the initiation and the inhibition of behavioral responses
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective Rating of Level of Anxiety During Threat Condition
|
6.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
|
8.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
|
Adverse Events
Substudy 1/ Neutral, Predictable, and Unpredictable Responses - Healthy Participants
Substudy 1/ Neutral, Predictable, and Unpredictable Responses - Anxiety Subjects
Substudy 2/Working Memory Task - Healthy Participants
Substudy 2/Working Memory Task - Anxiety Subjects
Substudy 5/Face Stroop Task - Healthy Participants
Substudy 5/Face Stroop Task - Anxiety Subjects
Substudy 7/Active Avoidance and Sustained Attention Tasks - Healthy Participants
Substudy 7/Active Avoidance and Sustained Attention Tasks - Anxiety Subjects
Pilot Tasks - Healthy Participants
Pilot Tasks - Anxiety Subjects
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place