Trial Outcomes & Findings for Riluzole to Treat Depression in Bipolar Disorder (NCT NCT00054704)
NCT ID: NCT00054704
Last Updated: 2019-04-25
Results Overview
The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a clinician-rated assessment of depression symptoms. Patients were rated weekly on 10 symptoms on a scale of 0 to 6 for each item, where 0 indicated no symptoms and 6 indicated the highest severity of that symptom. Total scores range from 0 to 60, where a moderate severity of depression would be present with a score of at least 20.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
19 participants
8 weeks
2019-04-25
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Riluzole
Riluzole was dispensed either once or twice a day as 50 mg tablets. Riluzole dosing began at 50 mg twice per day by mouth and was increased on a weekly basis by 50 mg, as tolerated, to achieve a dose of 200 mg/day. Dose escalations continued until at least a 50% reduction in depression (MADRS) scores, intolerable side effects, or study completion. Dose was raised on a weekly basis by 50 mg until the dose of 200 mg was achieved unless precluded by an adverse event. If significant side effects occurred, titration was slowed and doses were reduced under double-blind conditions. The maximum permitted dose of riluzole was 200 mg/day. Those subjects not tolerating a dosage of 50 mg/day were removed from the study.
|
Placebo
Placebo pills resembling 50 mg riluzole tables were dispensed either once or twice a day. Dosing began at 50 mg twice per day by mouth and was increased on a weekly basis by 50 mg, as tolerated, to achieve a dose of 200 mg/day. Dose escalations continued until at least a 50% reduction in depression (MADRS) scores, intolerable side effects, or study completion. Dose was raised on a weekly basis by 50 mg until the dose of 200 mg was achieved unless precluded by an adverse event. If significant side effects occurred, titration was slowed and doses were reduced under double-blind conditions. The maximum permitted dose of riluzole was 200 mg/day. Those subjects not tolerating a dosage of 50 mg/day were removed from the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
8
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
3
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Riluzole
Riluzole was dispensed either once or twice a day as 50 mg tablets. Riluzole dosing began at 50 mg twice per day by mouth and was increased on a weekly basis by 50 mg, as tolerated, to achieve a dose of 200 mg/day. Dose escalations continued until at least a 50% reduction in depression (MADRS) scores, intolerable side effects, or study completion. Dose was raised on a weekly basis by 50 mg until the dose of 200 mg was achieved unless precluded by an adverse event. If significant side effects occurred, titration was slowed and doses were reduced under double-blind conditions. The maximum permitted dose of riluzole was 200 mg/day. Those subjects not tolerating a dosage of 50 mg/day were removed from the study.
|
Placebo
Placebo pills resembling 50 mg riluzole tables were dispensed either once or twice a day. Dosing began at 50 mg twice per day by mouth and was increased on a weekly basis by 50 mg, as tolerated, to achieve a dose of 200 mg/day. Dose escalations continued until at least a 50% reduction in depression (MADRS) scores, intolerable side effects, or study completion. Dose was raised on a weekly basis by 50 mg until the dose of 200 mg was achieved unless precluded by an adverse event. If significant side effects occurred, titration was slowed and doses were reduced under double-blind conditions. The maximum permitted dose of riluzole was 200 mg/day. Those subjects not tolerating a dosage of 50 mg/day were removed from the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
2
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Riluzole to Treat Depression in Bipolar Disorder
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Riluzole
n=8 Participants
Riluzole was dispensed either once or twice a day as 50 mg tablets. Riluzole dosing began at 50 mg twice per day by mouth and was increased on a weekly basis by 50 mg, as tolerated, to achieve a dose of 200 mg/day. Dose escalations continued until at least a 50% reduction in depression (MADRS) scores, intolerable side effects, or study completion. Dose was raised on a weekly basis by 50 mg until the dose of 200 mg was achieved unless precluded by an adverse event. If significant side effects occurred, titration was slowed and doses were reduced under double-blind conditions. The maximum permitted dose of riluzole was be 200 mg/day. Those subjects not tolerating a dosage of 50 mg/day were removed from the study.
|
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Placebo pills resembling 50 mg riluzole tables were dispensed either once or twice a day. Dosing began at 50 mg twice per day by mouth and was increased on a weekly basis by 50 mg, as tolerated, to achieve a dose of 200 mg/day. Dose escalations continued until at least a 50% reduction in depression (MADRS) scores, intolerable side effects, or study completion. Dose was raised on a weekly basis by 50 mg until the dose of 200 mg was achieved unless precluded by an adverse event. If significant side effects occurred, titration was slowed and doses were reduced under double-blind conditions. The maximum permitted dose of riluzole was be 200 mg/day. Those subjects not tolerating a dosage of 50 mg/day were removed from the study.
|
Total
n=19 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
47.29 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.00 • n=93 Participants
|
48.73 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.29 • n=4 Participants
|
48.08 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.74 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
8 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeksPopulation: Data from all patients were included in the analysis, except for one riluzole patient with missing data.
The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a clinician-rated assessment of depression symptoms. Patients were rated weekly on 10 symptoms on a scale of 0 to 6 for each item, where 0 indicated no symptoms and 6 indicated the highest severity of that symptom. Total scores range from 0 to 60, where a moderate severity of depression would be present with a score of at least 20.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Riluzole
n=8 Participants
Riluzole was dispensed either once or twice a day as 50 mg tablets. Riluzole dosing began at 50 mg twice per day by mouth and was increased on a weekly basis by 50 mg, as tolerated, to achieve a dose of 200 mg/day. Dose escalations continued until at least a 50% reduction in depression (MADRS) scores, intolerable side effects, or study completion. Dose was raised on a weekly basis by 50 mg until the dose of 200 mg was achieved unless precluded by an adverse event. If significant side effects occurred, titration was slowed and doses were reduced under double-blind conditions. The maximum permitted dose of riluzole was be 200 mg/day. Those subjects not tolerating a dosage of 50 mg/day were removed from the study.
|
Placebo
n=11 Participants
Placebo pills resembling 50 mg riluzole tables were dispensed either once or twice a day. Dosing began at 50 mg twice per day by mouth and was increased on a weekly basis by 50 mg, as tolerated, to achieve a dose of 200 mg/day. Dose escalations continued until at least a 50% reduction in depression (MADRS) scores, intolerable side effects, or study completion. Dose was raised on a weekly basis by 50 mg until the dose of 200 mg was achieved unless precluded by an adverse event. If significant side effects occurred, titration was slowed and doses were reduced under double-blind conditions. The maximum permitted dose of riluzole was be 200 mg/day. Those subjects not tolerating a dosage of 50 mg/day were removed from the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
|
29.551 Units on a scale
Standard Error 2.481
|
23.723 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.916
|
Adverse Events
Riluzole
Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Riluzole
n=8 participants at risk
Riluzole was dispensed either once or twice a day as 50 mg tablets. Riluzole dosing began at 50 mg twice per day by mouth and was increased on a weekly basis by 50 mg, as tolerated, to achieve a dose of 200 mg/day. Dose escalations continued until at least a 50% reduction in depression (MADRS) scores, intolerable side effects, or study completion. Dose was raised on a weekly basis by 50 mg until the dose of 200 mg was achieved unless precluded by an adverse event. If significant side effects occurred, titration was slowed and doses were reduced under double-blind conditions. The maximum permitted dose of riluzole was be 200 mg/day. Those subjects not tolerating a dosage of 50 mg/day were removed from the study.
|
Placebo
n=11 participants at risk
Placebo pills resembling 50 mg riluzole tables were dispensed either once or twice a day. Dosing began at 50 mg twice per day by mouth and was increased on a weekly basis by 50 mg, as tolerated, to achieve a dose of 200 mg/day. Dose escalations continued until at least a 50% reduction in depression (MADRS) scores, intolerable side effects, or study completion. Dose was raised on a weekly basis by 50 mg until the dose of 200 mg was achieved unless precluded by an adverse event. If significant side effects occurred, titration was slowed and doses were reduced under double-blind conditions. The maximum permitted dose of riluzole was be 200 mg/day. Those subjects not tolerating a dosage of 50 mg/day were removed from the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Coughing
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
27.3%
3/11 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal Problems
|
62.5%
5/8 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Decreased libido
|
25.0%
2/8 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
27.3%
3/11 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
|
General disorders
Dizziness
|
37.5%
3/8 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
|
General disorders
Headache
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
|
General disorders
Dry mouth
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle, joint, or bone pain
|
25.0%
2/8 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal and throat problems
|
37.5%
3/8 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
27.3%
3/11 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
|
General disorders
Sleep problems
|
62.5%
5/8 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
36.4%
4/11 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
|
General disorders
Memory problems
|
25.0%
2/8 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
25.0%
2/8 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
|
General disorders
Concentration difficulty
|
37.5%
3/8 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
37.5%
3/8 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin irritation
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data was collected systematically on a weekly basis throughout the course of 8 weeks of study. An inventory of individual symptoms was used to evaluate adverse events on a scale from none to severe.
|
Additional Information
Dr. Carlos Zarate
NIMH, DIRP, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place