DIVA Study - A Study of Different Regimens of Intravenous Administration of Bonviva (Ibandronate) in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis

NCT ID: NCT00048074

Last Updated: 2016-02-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1395 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-06-30

Study Completion Date

2005-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous administration of Bonviva regimens in women with post-menopausal osteoporosis, compared to oral daily administration. Patients will also receive daily supplementation with vitamin D and calcium. The anticipated time of study treatment is 2+ years, and the target sample size is 500+ individuals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post Menopausal Osteoporosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

oral placebo daily and IV ibandronate 2 mg q 2 mo

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ibandronate [Bonviva/Boniva]

Intervention Type DRUG

2mg iv every 2 months

2

oral ibandronate 2.5 mg daily and IV placebo q 2 mo and q 3 mo

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ibandronate [Bonviva/Boniva]

Intervention Type DRUG

2.5mg po daily

3

oral placebo daily and IV ibandronate 3 mg q 3 mo

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ibandronate [Bonviva/Boniva]

Intervention Type DRUG

3mg iv every 3 months

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ibandronate [Bonviva/Boniva]

2mg iv every 2 months

Intervention Type DRUG

ibandronate [Bonviva/Boniva]

2.5mg po daily

Intervention Type DRUG

ibandronate [Bonviva/Boniva]

3mg iv every 3 months

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* women 55-80 years of age;
* post-menopausal for \>=5 years;
* ambulatory.

Exclusion Criteria

* malignant disease diagnosed within the previous 10 years (except basal cell cancer that has been successfully removed);
* breast cancer within the previous 20 years;
* allergy to bisphosphonates;
* previous treatment with an intravenous bisphosphonate at any time;
* previous treatment with an oral bisphosphonate within the last 6 months, \>1 month of treatment within the last year, or \>3 months of treatment within the last 2 years.
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

Rancho Mirage, California, United States

Site Status

Leesburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Darlinghurst, , Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, , Australia

Site Status

Nedlands, , Australia

Site Status

St Leonards, , Australia

Site Status

Sydney, , Australia

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Laval, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Ballerup Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Vejle, , Denmark

Site Status

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Arenzano, , Italy

Site Status

Siena, , Italy

Site Status

Valeggio sul Mincio, , Italy

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Haugesund, , Norway

Site Status

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Stavanger, , Norway

Site Status

Grudziądz, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Sommerset West, , South Africa

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Aberdeen, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Canada Czechia Denmark France Germany Hungary Italy Mexico Norway Poland South Africa Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bianchi G, Czerwinski E, Kenwright A, Burdeska A, Recker RR, Felsenberg D. Long-term administration of quarterly IV ibandronate is effective and well tolerated in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 5-year data from the DIVA study long-term extension. Osteoporos Int. 2012 Jun;23(6):1769-78. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1793-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21975558 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BM16550

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.