Tanespimycin, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride, and Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

NCT ID: NCT00047047

Last Updated: 2013-06-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

78 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This phase I trial studies the side effects, best way to give, and best doses of tanespimycin with or without gemcitabine hydrochloride and cisplatin in treating patients with advanced solid tumors. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as tanespimycin, gemcitabine hydrochloride, and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Using more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of 17-AAG (tanespimycin) when given on days 1 and 8 of every 3 weeks cycle in combination with Gemzar (gemcitabine hydrochloride) and CDDP (cisplatin) (cohorts A, B, and E).

II. To determine the MTD of 17-AAG plus Gemzar when Gemzar is given on days 1 and 8 and 17-AAG is given on days 2 and 9 every 3 weeks (cohort C).

III. To determine the MTD of 17-AAG plus CDDP when given on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (cohort D).

IV. To define the dose-limiting toxicity of 17-AAG when used in combination with Gemzar and CDDP.

V. To assess the effect of 17-AAG on surrogate markers when used in combination with Gemzar and CDDP.

VI. To report any responses observed.

OUTLINE: This is a dose-escalation study. Patients are assigned to 1 of 3 treatment cohorts.

Cohort A (closed to accrual as of 3/2/04)\*: Patients receive escalating doses of gemcitabine hydrochloride intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes, tanespimycin IV over 1 hour, and cisplatin IV over 2 hours on days 1 and 8. NOTE: \*The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this 3-drug combination has been determined as of 3/2/04.

Cohort B (closed to accrual as of 3/2/05): Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride\*\* IV over 30 minutes, tanespimycin IV over 1 hour, and cisplatin\*\* IV over 2 hours on days 1 and 8.

Cohort C: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride\*\* IV over 30 minutes and tanespimycin IV over 1-2 hours on days 2 and 9.

Cohort D: Patients receive cisplatin\*\* IV over 2 hours and tanespimycin IV over 1-2 hours on days 1 and 8.

Cohort E: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride\*\*\*, tanespimycin\*\*\*, and cisplatin\*\*\* as in cohort B.

In all cohorts, courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 3 months.

NOTE: \*\*Gemcitabine hydrochloride and cisplatin dosage is constant, while 17-AAG is escalated in cohorts B, C, and D.

NOTE: \*\*\*Gemcitabine hydrochloride dosage is constant, 17-AAG is started at a higher dose level than all other cohorts, and cisplatin dosage is escalated in cohort E.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment (tanespimycin, gemcitabine hydrochloride, cisplatin)

Cohort A (closed to accrual as of 3/2/04)\*: Patients receive escalating doses of gemcitabine hydrochloride intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes, tanespimycin IV over 1 hour, and cisplatin IV over 2 hours on days 1 and 8. NOTE: \*The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this 3-drug combination has been determined as of 3/2/04.

Cohort B (closed to accrual as of 3/2/05): Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride\*\* IV over 30 minutes, tanespimycin IV over 1 hour, and cisplatin\*\* IV over 2 hours on days 1 and 8.

Cohort C: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride\*\* IV over 30 minutes and tanespimycin IV over 1-2 hours on days 2 and 9.

Cohort D: Patients receive cisplatin\*\* IV over 2 hours and tanespimycin IV over 1-2 hours on days 1 and 8.

Cohort E: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride\*\*\*, tanespimycin\*\*\*, and cisplatin\*\*\* as in cohort B.

Continued (see detailed description)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

gemcitabine hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

tanespimycin

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cisplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

laboratory biomarker analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Correlative studies

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

gemcitabine hydrochloride

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

tanespimycin

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

cisplatin

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

laboratory biomarker analysis

Correlative studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

dFdC difluorodeoxycytidine hydrochloride gemcitabine Gemzar 17-AAG CACP CDDP CPDD DDP

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologic proof of cancer that is now considered clinically unresectable
* Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>= 1500/uL
* Platelets (PLT) \>= 100,000/uL
* Total bilirubin =\< 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) =\< 2.5 x ULN
* Creatinine =\< 1.5 x ULN
* Alkaline phosphatase =\< 2 x ULN or =\< 5 x ULN if liver involvement
* Hemoglobin (Hgb) \>= 9.0 g/dL
* Ability to provide informed consent
* Willingness to return to Mayo Clinic Rochester for follow up
* Life expectancy \>= 12 weeks
* Willingness to provide all biologic specimens as required by the protocol; this is the mandatory translational research component
* Prior treatment with gemcitabine or cisplatin or both is allowed
* Patients who have had prior anthracycline must have a normal ejection fraction on multi gated acquisition scan (MUGA)
* Women of childbearing potential only: negative serum pregnancy test done =\< 7 days prior to registration

Exclusion Criteria

* Known standard therapy for the patient's disease that is potentially curative or definitely capable of extending life expectancy
* ECOG performance status (PS) 2, 3 or 4
* Uncontrolled infection
* Any of the following prior therapies:

* Chemotherapy =\< 4 weeks prior to study entry
* Mitomycin C/nitrosoureas =\< 6 weeks prior to study entry
* Immunotherapy =\< 4 weeks prior to study entry
* Biologic therapy =\< 4 weeks prior to study entry
* Radiation therapy =\< 4 weeks prior to study entry, or any radiation that potentially included the heart in the field (e.g., mantle)
* Radiation to \> 25% of bone marrow
* Radiopharmaceuticals
* Chest radiation
* Failure to fully recover from acute, reversible effects of prior chemotherapy regardless of interval since last treatment
* Significant cardiac disease including:

* Heart failure that meets New York Heart Association classification III or IV
* History of myocardial infarction =\< one year of study entry
* Uncontrolled dysrhythmias or requiring antiarrhythmic drugs, or
* Poorly controlled angina
* Active ischemic heart disease =\< 12 months prior to study entry
* Congenital long QT syndrome
* Left bundle branch block
* Central nervous system (CNS) metastases or seizure disorder
* Any of the following:

* Pregnant women
* Nursing women
* Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception (condoms, diaphragm, injections, intrauterine device \[IUD\], or abstinence, etc.) Note: Concurrent use of oral contraceptives is contraindicated
* Other concurrent chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, or any ancillary therapy considered investigational (utilized for a non-Food and Drug Administration \[FDA\]-approved indication and in the context of a research investigation)
* History of serious allergic reactions to eggs
* Concurrent use of drugs known to be inhibitors of the 3A4 enzyme
* \>= grade 2 peripheral neuropathy, as defined by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 2.0
* Significant underlying pulmonary disease as manifested by requirement for oxygen or pulmonary fibrosis on chest x-ray
* Use of concomitant medications that prolong or may prolong corrected QT interval (QTc)
* History of serious ventricular arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia \[VT\] or ventricular fibrillation \[VF\], \>= 3 beats in a row), QTc \>= 450 msec for men and 470 msec for women, or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) =\< 40% by MUGA
* Patients with symptomatic pulmonary disease requiring medication including the following: dyspnea, dyspnea on exertion, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, oxygen requirement and significant pulmonary disease, including chronic obstructive/restrictive pulmonary disease; note: patients that meet the Medicare criteria for home oxygen should be excluded from the protocol
* Patients with a prior history of cardiac or pulmonary toxicity after receiving anthracyclines such as doxorubicin, daunorubicin, mitoxantrone, bleomycin or carmustine (BCNU)
* Patients with greater or equal to grade 2 pulmonary or cardiac symptoms
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Charles Erlichman

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MC0111

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MAYO-MC0111

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000257247

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NCI-5291

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U01CA069912

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

NCI-2012-01429

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.