Prophylaxis Trial of Posaconazole Versus Standard Azole Therapy for Neutropenic Patients (Study P01899)

NCT ID: NCT00044486

Last Updated: 2017-03-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

602 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-07-31

Study Completion Date

2005-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This trial is in high risk patients to determine the safety and efficacy of posaconazole vs. fluconazole in the prophylaxis against development of invasive fungal infections.

Profound, prolonged neutropenia (Absolute neutrophil count\<500 cells/cubic mm for at least 7 days) due to induction chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome.

Treatment Duration: maximum of 12 weeks Follow-Up 2 months. Endpoints: incidence of proven or probable IFI according to EORTC/MSG criteria within the neutropenic episode and within 100 days of randomization as determined by external expert review.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is designed to determine the safety, tolerance and efficacy of POZ used as prophylaxis if IFI in high-risk subjects with prolonged profound neutropenia. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of SCH 56592 vs fluconazole and itraconazole in preventing proven or probable IFI during neutropenic episodes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Leukemia, Myelocytic, Acute Myelodysplastic Syndromes Neutropenia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Posaconazole oral suspension

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults or adolescents (age\>13 years) and weight\> 34kg, either gender
* Disease definition: Anticipated or documented prolonged neutropenia (ANC\<500/mm3 2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of less than 3.
* Female subjects of childbearing age must be using a medically accepted method of birth control before beginning study-drug treatment and agree to continue its use during the study or be surgically sterilized (eg, hysterectomy or tubal ligation).
* Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test (beta-hcG) at Baseline or within 72 hours before the start of the study drug.

Exclusion Criteria

* Female subjects who are pregnant, intend to become pregnant, or are nursing.
* Excluded prior treatments: Subjects previously treated with AMB, FLZ, or ITZ for proven or probable IFI within 30 days of enrollment.
* Excluded treatments prior to specific study phases: Subjects who have taken the following drugs: those known to interact with azoles and that may lead to life-threatening side effects.
* Subjects who have used any investigational drugs or biologic agents other than their chemotherapy regimens within 30 days of study entry.
* Subjects who are participating in any other blinded clinical study within 30 days of study entry.
* Subjects with renal insufficiency (estimated creatinine clearance less than 20 mL/minute at Baseline or likely to require dialysis during the study).
* Subjects having an ECG with a prolonged QTc interval by manual reading: QTc greater than 450 msec for men and greater than 470 msec for women.
* Subjects with moderate or severe liver dysfunction at baseline, defined as aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or alkaline phosphatase levels greater than 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), or a total bilirubin level greater than 3 times the ULN.
Minimum Eligible Age

13 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cornely OA, Maertens J, Winston DJ, Perfect J, Ullmann AJ, Walsh TJ, Helfgott D, Holowiecki J, Stockelberg D, Goh YT, Petrini M, Hardalo C, Suresh R, Angulo-Gonzalez D. Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):348-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061094.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 17251531 (View on PubMed)

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: CSR Synopsis

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P01899

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PTX3-targeted Antifungal Prophylaxis
NCT03828773 RECRUITING NA