Trial Outcomes & Findings for Atazanavir (BMS-232632) in Combination With Ritonavir or Saquinavir, and Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Each With Tenofovir and a Nucleoside in Subjects With HIV (NCT NCT00035932)

NCT ID: NCT00035932

Last Updated: 2010-12-24

Results Overview

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

571 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline, Week 24

Results posted on

2010-12-24

Participant Flow

571 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected participants were enrolled; 358 (63%) were randomized to treatment. Of the 213 not randomized, 194 did not meet eligibility criteria; other reasons include duplicate enrollment (4), accrual closed (1), noncompliance (1), serious adverse event (2), patient request (11), missing information (4).

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
atazanavir (ATV) 300 mg + ritonavir (RTV) 100 mg + tenofovir (TDF) 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
ATV 400 mg + saquinavir (SQV) 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
lopinavir (LPV)/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Overall Study
STARTED
119
110
118
Overall Study
Discontinued Prior to Week 48 Visit
26
29
13
Overall Study
Discontinued Between Weeks 48 and 96
26
27
30
Overall Study
Discontinued on or After Week 96
4
4
6
Overall Study
COMPLETED
63
50
69
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
56
60
49

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
atazanavir (ATV) 300 mg + ritonavir (RTV) 100 mg + tenofovir (TDF) 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
ATV 400 mg + saquinavir (SQV) 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
lopinavir (LPV)/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Overall Study
Adverse Event
10
9
9
Overall Study
Death
0
0
1
Overall Study
Disease Progression / Relapse
1
1
0
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
4
4
3
Overall Study
Noncompliance
6
7
6
Overall Study
Protocol Violation While on Study
0
1
2
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1
5
0
Overall Study
Study Termination by Sponsor
1
0
0
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
33
33
28

Baseline Characteristics

Atazanavir (BMS-232632) in Combination With Ritonavir or Saquinavir, and Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Each With Tenofovir and a Nucleoside in Subjects With HIV

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=115 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=123 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Total
n=358 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age Continuous
39 years
n=5 Participants
41 years
n=7 Participants
39 years
n=5 Participants
40 years
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
77 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
96 Participants
n=5 Participants
89 Participants
n=7 Participants
96 Participants
n=5 Participants
281 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
75 participants
n=5 Participants
70 participants
n=7 Participants
71 participants
n=5 Participants
216 participants
n=4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
27 participants
n=5 Participants
26 participants
n=7 Participants
27 participants
n=5 Participants
80 participants
n=4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
18 participants
n=5 Participants
16 participants
n=7 Participants
21 participants
n=5 Participants
55 participants
n=4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 participants
n=5 Participants
3 participants
n=7 Participants
4 participants
n=5 Participants
7 participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South America
56 participants
n=5 Participants
55 participants
n=7 Participants
54 participants
n=5 Participants
165 participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
North America
39 participants
n=5 Participants
38 participants
n=7 Participants
47 participants
n=5 Participants
124 participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Europe
25 participants
n=5 Participants
22 participants
n=7 Participants
22 participants
n=5 Participants
69 participants
n=4 Participants
Acquired Immunodeficiency Virus (AIDS)
Yes
33 participants
n=5 Participants
33 participants
n=7 Participants
36 participants
n=5 Participants
102 participants
n=4 Participants
Acquired Immunodeficiency Virus (AIDS)
No
87 participants
n=5 Participants
82 participants
n=7 Participants
87 participants
n=5 Participants
256 participants
n=4 Participants
Intravenous (IV) Drug Use
Yes
8 participants
n=5 Participants
7 participants
n=7 Participants
8 participants
n=5 Participants
23 participants
n=4 Participants
Intravenous (IV) Drug Use
No
112 participants
n=5 Participants
108 participants
n=7 Participants
115 participants
n=5 Participants
335 participants
n=4 Participants
Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) cell count
317 cells/mm^3
n=5 Participants
286 cells/mm^3
n=7 Participants
283 cells/mm^3
n=5 Participants
297 cells/mm^3
n=4 Participants
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Ribonucleic Acid (HIV RNA)
4.44 log10 c/mL
n=5 Participants
4.42 log10 c/mL
n=7 Participants
4.47 log10 c/mL
n=5 Participants
4.45 log10 c/mL
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Randomized participants; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=115 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=123 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Mean Change From Baseline in HIV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) at Week 24
-1.86 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.11
-1.52 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.13
-1.89 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.11

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Randomized participants; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=115 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=123 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Mean Change From Baseline in HIV RNA at Week 48
-1.93 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.12
-1.55 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.14
-1.87 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.13

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

Population: Randomized participants while on initial regimen

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=64 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=65 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Mean Change From Baseline in HIV RNA at Week 96
-2.29 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.121
-2.08 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.151

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2

Population: Treated participants, as-randomized (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=115 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=123 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Mean Change From Baseline in HIV RNA at Week 2
-1.18 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.06
-1.14 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.07
-1.30 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.06

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Number of Participants Analyzed=Randomized participants; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization); n=number of evaluable (overall, PI sensitive, PI resistant) participants.

Number of participants with a \>=0.5 log10 decrease in HIV RNA from baseline or HIV RNA \< 400 c/mL at Week 24, by their baseline phenotypic sensitivity to their randomized PI.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=115 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=123 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Participants Achieving Virologic Half Log Suppression (Limit of Quantification [LOQ] = 400 c/mL) at Week 24 (Overall and by Protease Inhibitor [PI] Sensitivity)
Overall (n=120, 115, 123)
95 participants
74 participants
93 participants
Participants Achieving Virologic Half Log Suppression (Limit of Quantification [LOQ] = 400 c/mL) at Week 24 (Overall and by Protease Inhibitor [PI] Sensitivity)
PI Sensitive (n=88, 83, 88)
79 participants
58 participants
72 participants
Participants Achieving Virologic Half Log Suppression (Limit of Quantification [LOQ] = 400 c/mL) at Week 24 (Overall and by Protease Inhibitor [PI] Sensitivity)
PI Resistant (n=32, 30, 33)
16 participants
15 participants
19 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Number of Participants Analyzed=Randomized participants; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).n=number of evaluable (overall, PI sensitive, PI resistant) participants.

Number of participants with a \>=0.5 log10 decrease in HIV RNA from baseline or HIV RNA \< 400 c/mL at Week 48, by their baseline phenotypic sensitivity to their randomized PI.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=115 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=123 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Participants Achieving Virologic Half Log Suppression (LOQ = 400 c/mL) at Week 48, (Overall and by PI Sensitivity)
PI Sensitive (n=88, 84, 88)
65 participants
52 participants
67 participants
Participants Achieving Virologic Half Log Suppression (LOQ = 400 c/mL) at Week 48, (Overall and by PI Sensitivity)
Overall (n=120, 115, 123)
77 participants
60 participants
84 participants
Participants Achieving Virologic Half Log Suppression (LOQ = 400 c/mL) at Week 48, (Overall and by PI Sensitivity)
PI Resistant (n=32, 30, 33)
12 participants
7 participants
16 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

Population: Observed case analysis: Randomized participants (while on initial regimen--completers censored) with baseline and on-study measurement.

Number of participants with a \>=0.5 log10 decrease in HIV RNA from baseline or HIV RNA \< 400 c/mL at Week 96.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=113 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Participants Achieving Virologic Half Log Suppression (LOQ = 400 c/mL) at Week 96
61 participants
58 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: Randomized participants; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=115 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=123 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Participants Achieving Virologic Half Log Suppression (LOQ = 50 c/mL) at Week 24
95 participants
74 participants
93 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: As there were multiple efficacy algorithms run and multiple subsets analyzed, it was decided to only use LOQ \< 50 on the primary endpoint, and to run LOQ\<400 for subsets such as baseline PI sensitivity.

Number of participants with a \>=0.5 log10 decrease in HIV RNA from baseline or HIV RNA \< 50 c/mL at Week 24, by their baseline phenotypic sensitivity to their randomized PI.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 48

Population: Randomized participants; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=115 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=123 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Participants Achieving Virologic Half Log Suppression (LOQ = 50 c/mL) at Week 48
76 Participants
60 Participants
84 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Population: As there were multiple efficacy algorithms run and multiple subsets analyzed, it was decided to only use LOQ \< 50 on the primary endpoint, and to run LOQ\<400 for subsets such as baseline PI sensitivity.

Number of participants with a \>=0.5 log10 decrease in HIV RNA from baseline or HIV RNA \< 50 c/mL at Week 48, by their baseline phenotypic sensitivity to their randomized PI.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 96

Population: Randomized participants while on initial regimen (completers censored).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=113 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Participants Achieving Virologic Half Log Suppression (LOQ = 50 c/mL) at Week 96
61 Participants
57 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: Randomized participants while on initial regimen Randomized participants, (completers censored).

Treatment Response = confirmed suppression to LOQ (400 c/mL). The Algorithm for Treatment Response Without Prior Failure (TRPWF) = participants staying in response at the analysis timepoint without having an intervening, confirmed rebound.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=115 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=123 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Participants Achieving Treatment Response (LOQ = 400 c/mL) Without Prior Failure at Week 24
76 participants
50 participants
74 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 48

Population: Randomized participants, as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Treatment Response = confirmed suppression to LOQ (400 c/mL). The Algorithm for Treatment Response Without Prior Failure (TRPWF) = participants staying in response at the analysis timepoint without having an intervening, confirmed rebound.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=115 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=123 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Participants Achieving Treatment Response (LOQ = 400 c/mL) Without Prior Failure at Week 48
64 participants
42 participants
67 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 96

Population: Randomized participants while on initial regimen (completers censored).

Treatment Response = confirmed suppression to LOQ (400 c/mL). The Algorithm for Treatment Response Without Prior Failure (TRPWF) = participants staying in response at the analysis timepoint without having an intervening, confirmed rebound.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=116 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Participants Achieving Treatment Response (LOQ = 400 c/mL) Without Prior Failure at Week 96
52 participants
53 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: Randomized participants, as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Treatment Response = confirmed suppression to LOQ (50 c/mL). The Algorithm for Treatment Response Without Prior Failure (TRPWF) = participants staying in response at the analysis timepoint without having an intervening, confirmed rebound.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=115 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=123 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Participants Achieving Treatment Response (LOQ = 50 c/mL) Without Prior Failure at Week 24
46 participants
25 participants
50 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 48

Population: Randomized participantsRandomized participants while on initial regimen (completers censored).

Treatment Response = confirmed suppression to LOQ (50 c/mL). The Algorithm for Treatment Response Without Prior Failure (TRPWF) = participants staying in response at the analysis timepoint without having an intervening, confirmed rebound.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=115 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=123 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Participants Achieving Treatment Response (LOQ = 50 c/mL) Without Prior Failure at Week 48
43 participants
28 participants
52 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 96

Population: Randomized participants while on initial regimen (completers censored)

Treatment Response = confirmed suppression to LOQ (50 c/mL). The Algorithm for Treatment Response Without Prior Failure (TRPWF) = participants staying in response at the analysis timepoint without having an intervening, confirmed rebound.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=118 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Participants Achieving Treatment Response (LOQ = 50 c/mL) Without Prior Failure at Week 96
38 participants
41 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Randomized participantsRandomized participants while on initial regimen (completers censored).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=115 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=123 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 24
83 cells/mm3
Standard Error 14.0
59 cells/mm3
Standard Error 11.8
90 cells/mm3
Standard Error 15.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Randomized participants while on initial regimen (completers censored).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=115 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=123 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48
110 cells/mm3
Standard Error 22.9
72 cells/mm3
Standard Error 19.7
121 cells/mm3
Standard Error 20.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 96

Population: Randomized participants (while on initial regimen) with evaluation at time point

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=60 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=60 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 96
122 cells/mm3
Standard Error 26.3
154 cells/mm3
Standard Error 24.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Week 24: Participants with evaluable PK measurements

Pearson correlations of the Cmin (trough plasma concentration), IQ (the ratio of Cmin of ATV to HIV IC50), and Number of baseline PI Mutations with HIV RNA change from baseline at Week 24 were explored.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=40 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=23 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Correlation of ATV Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin), Inhibitory Quotient (IQ), and Number of Protease Inhibitor (PI) Mutations at Baseline With HIV RNA Change From Baseline at Week 24
ATV Cmin
-0.056 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
0.254 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
Correlation of ATV Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin), Inhibitory Quotient (IQ), and Number of Protease Inhibitor (PI) Mutations at Baseline With HIV RNA Change From Baseline at Week 24
IQ (<10; >=10)
-0.391 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
-0.081 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
Correlation of ATV Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin), Inhibitory Quotient (IQ), and Number of Protease Inhibitor (PI) Mutations at Baseline With HIV RNA Change From Baseline at Week 24
# of PI Mutations at baseline (<4; >=4)
0.306 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
0.437 Pearson Correlation Coefficient

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Formal population PK/PD analysis was not performed due to difficulties in correlating time of blood sample collection with drug administration, and inability to apply the PK model generated with data obtained from healthy subjects due to newly observed differences in exposure to atazanavir between HIV-infected participants and healthy participants.

Pearson correlations of the Cmin (trough plasma concentration), IQ (the ratio of Cmin of ATV to HIV IC50), and Number of baseline PI Mutations with HIV RNA change from baseline at Week 48 were explored.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Participants with evaluable PK measurements, as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Pearson correlations of the Cmin (trough plasma concentration), IQ (the ratio of Cmin of ATV to HIV IC50), and Number of baseline PI Mutations with CD4 cell count change from baseline at Week 24 were explored.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=40 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=23 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Correlation of ATV Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) Inhibitory Quotient (IQ), and Number of PI Mutations at Baseline and CD4 Cell Count Change From Baseline at Week 24
ATV Cmin
0.37 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
-0.21 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
Correlation of ATV Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) Inhibitory Quotient (IQ), and Number of PI Mutations at Baseline and CD4 Cell Count Change From Baseline at Week 24
IQ (<10; >=10)
0.376 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
0.105 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
Correlation of ATV Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) Inhibitory Quotient (IQ), and Number of PI Mutations at Baseline and CD4 Cell Count Change From Baseline at Week 24
# of PI Mutations at baseline (<4; >=4)
-0.395 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
-0.227 Pearson Correlation Coefficient

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Formal population PK/PD analysis was not performed due to difficulties in correlating time of blood sample collection with drug administration, and inability to apply the PK model generated with data obtained from healthy subjects due to newly observed differences in exposure to atazanavir between HIV-infected participants and healthy participants.

Pearson correlations of the Cmin (trough plasma concentration), IQ (the ratio of Cmin of ATV to HIV IC50), and Number of baseline PI Mutations with CD4 cell count change from baseline at Week 48 were explored.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Treated Participants, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF), as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Mean percent change in total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, fasting low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=119 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=110 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=118 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Lipid Mean Percent Change From Baseline at Week 24
Total Cholesterol
-8 percent change
-9 percent change
3 percent change
Lipid Mean Percent Change From Baseline at Week 24
High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol
-7 percent change
-1 percent change
0 percent change
Lipid Mean Percent Change From Baseline at Week 24
Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol
-10 percent change
-11 percent change
-4 percent change
Lipid Mean Percent Change From Baseline at Week 24
Fasting Triglycerides
-2 percent change
-14 percent change
31 percent change

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 48

Population: Treated Participants, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF); as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Mean percent change in total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, fasting low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=119 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=110 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=118 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Lipid Mean Percent Change From Baseline at Week 48
Total Cholesterol
-8 percent change in lipid values
-4 percent change in lipid values
6 percent change in lipid values
Lipid Mean Percent Change From Baseline at Week 48
HDL Cholesterol
-7 percent change in lipid values
4 percent change in lipid values
2 percent change in lipid values
Lipid Mean Percent Change From Baseline at Week 48
Fasting LDL Cholesterol
-10 percent change in lipid values
-3 percent change in lipid values
1 percent change in lipid values
Lipid Mean Percent Change From Baseline at Week 48
Fasting Triglycerides
-4 percent change in lipid values
-14 percent change in lipid values
30 percent change in lipid values

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 96

Population: Treated Participants; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Mean percent change in total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, fasting low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=119 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=110 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=118 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Lipid Mean Percent Change From Baseline at Week 96, Observed Values
Total Cholesterol (n=60, 46, 54)
-7 percent change in lipid values
-1 percent change in lipid values
9 percent change in lipid values
Lipid Mean Percent Change From Baseline at Week 96, Observed Values
HDL Cholesterol (n=60, 46, 54)
-5 percent change in lipid values
3 percent change in lipid values
7 percent change in lipid values
Lipid Mean Percent Change From Baseline at Week 96, Observed Values
Fasting LDL Cholesterol (n=52, 39, 43)
-11 percent change in lipid values
-7 percent change in lipid values
1 percent change in lipid values
Lipid Mean Percent Change From Baseline at Week 96, Observed Values
Fasting Triglycerides (n=52, 40, 43)
-2 percent change in lipid values
4 percent change in lipid values
30 percent change in lipid values

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Enrollment through Week 48

Population: Randomized participants for Deaths and SAEs; treated participants for all others; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization). In addition, of the 213 screen failures (not randomized), there were 4 subjects who had an SAE; these are not included in the table below.

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence/worsening of a pre-existing medical condition regardless of causal relationship. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death; is life-threatening; requires/prolongs inpatient hospitalization; results in persistent/significant disability; is cancer; is congenital anomaly/birth defect; results in drug dependency/abuse; is an important medical event.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=120 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=115 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=123 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Deaths, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events (AEs) Through Week 48
Deaths (n = 120, 115, 123)
0 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Deaths, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events (AEs) Through Week 48
AEs leading to discontinuation (n = 119, 110, 118)
6 participants
8 participants
5 participants
Deaths, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events (AEs) Through Week 48
SAEs (n = 120, 115, 123)
12 participants
14 participants
11 participants
Deaths, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events (AEs) Through Week 48
AEs, grades 1-4 (n = 119, 110, 118)
97 participants
93 participants
103 participants
Deaths, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events (AEs) Through Week 48
AEs, grades 3-4 (n = 119, 110, 118)
11 participants
18 participants
12 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Enrollment to Week 48

Population: Treated participants; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Prespecified AEs of interest included jaundice, ocular icterus, and hyperbilirubinemia.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=119 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=110 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=118 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Most Common AEs and AEs of Interest Through Week 48
Jaundice (AE of Interest)
19 participants
6 participants
0 participants
Most Common AEs and AEs of Interest Through Week 48
Ocular Icterus (AE of Interest)
13 participants
3 participants
0 participants
Most Common AEs and AEs of Interest Through Week 48
Hyperbilirubinemia (AE of Interest)
24 participants
8 participants
1 participants
Most Common AEs and AEs of Interest Through Week 48
Diarrhea (Most Common)
25 participants
29 participants
54 participants
Most Common AEs and AEs of Interest Through Week 48
Headache (Most Common)
21 participants
24 participants
18 participants
Most Common AEs and AEs of Interest Through Week 48
Nausea (Most Common)
19 participants
24 participants
15 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Treated Participants with evaluation at time point; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=104 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=87 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=99 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Fasting Glucose Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
0 mg/dL
Standard Error 1.6
-3 mg/dL
Standard Error 1.8
0 mg/dL
Standard Error 1.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 48

Population: Treated Participants with evaluation at time point; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=115 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=108 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=112 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Fasting Glucose Mean Change From Baseline at Week 48
4 mg/dL
Standard Error 3.6
-1 mg/dL
Standard Error 1.6
1 mg/dL
Standard Error 1.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Enrollment to Week 48

Population: Evaluable treated participants; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE) Grades:1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Life-threatening/disabling, 5=Death. Abnormal values: absolute neutrophil count: ≥500 to \<750/mm3 (grade 3), \<500/mm3 (grade 4); platelets: 20,000-49,999/mm3 (grade 3), \<20,000/mm3 or diffuse petechiae (grade 4); alanine transaminase (ALT): 5.1-10 x upper limit of normal (ULN; grade 3), \>10 x ULN (grade 4); aspartate transaminase (AST): 5.1-10 x ULN (grade 3), \>10 x ULN (grade 4); bilirubin: 2.6-5 x ULN (grade 3), \>5 x ULN (grade 4).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=119 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=108 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=118 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Grade 3/4 Laboratory Abnormalities Through Week 48
ALT Elevation
5 participants
4 participants
4 participants
Grade 3/4 Laboratory Abnormalities Through Week 48
Neutrophil Reduction
8 participants
8 participants
10 participants
Grade 3/4 Laboratory Abnormalities Through Week 48
Platelet Reduction
2 participants
4 participants
3 participants
Grade 3/4 Laboratory Abnormalities Through Week 48
AST Elevation
4 participants
2 participants
4 participants
Grade 3/4 Laboratory Abnormalities Through Week 48
Total Bilirubin Elevation
58 participants
22 participants
1 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 predose, 2-3 hours postdose, 6-12 hours postdose, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48

Population: Treated participants; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization). n=number of participants evaluated at timepoint

The QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle. The QT interval was corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's (QTcF) formula.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=119 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=110 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=118 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Fridericia-corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and Change From Baseline by Analysis Time Point
Baseline Mean (n=119, 110, 118)
390 msec
Standard Error 1.9
387 msec
Standard Error 2.2
390 msec
Standard Error 1.9
Fridericia-corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and Change From Baseline by Analysis Time Point
Mean Change at Week 4 predose (n=117, 104, 110)
-3 msec
Standard Error 1.6
1 msec
Standard Error 1.9
-2 msec
Standard Error 1.7
Fridericia-corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and Change From Baseline by Analysis Time Point
Mean Change Wk 4 2-3 hrs postdose (n=113,102,106)
-2 msec
Standard Error 1.6
-3 msec
Standard Error 2.0
-7 msec
Standard Error 1.9
Fridericia-corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and Change From Baseline by Analysis Time Point
Mean Change Wk 4 6-12 hrs postdose (n=112,101,105)
-4 msec
Standard Error 1.7
-1 msec
Standard Error 1.9
-8 msec
Standard Error 1.8
Fridericia-corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and Change From Baseline by Analysis Time Point
Mean Change at Week 12 (n=110, 97, 107)
2 msec
Standard Error 1.6
3 msec
Standard Error 2.0
2 msec
Standard Error 1.6
Fridericia-corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and Change From Baseline by Analysis Time Point
Mean Change at Week 24 (n=108, 92, 109)
1 msec
Standard Error 1.8
3 msec
Standard Error 2.2
2 msec
Standard Error 1.8
Fridericia-corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and Change From Baseline by Analysis Time Point
Mean Change at Week 48 (n=89, 75, 97)
-1 msec
Standard Error 1.8
-1 msec
Standard Error 2.1
0 msec
Standard Error 2.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 predose, 2-3 hours postdose, 6-12 hours postdose, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48

Population: Treated participants; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization). n=number of participants evaluated at timepoint

The PR interval is measured from the beginning of the P wave to the beginning of the QRS complex, and reflects the time the electrical impulse takes to travel from the sinus node through the atrioventricular (AV) node and entering the ventricles. The PR interval is therefore a good estimate of AV node function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=119 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=110 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=118 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
PR Interval and Change From Baseline by Analysis Time Point
Baseline Mean (n=119, 110, 118)
153 msec
Standard Error 1.7
155 msec
Standard Error 1.9
154 msec
Standard Error 1.7
PR Interval and Change From Baseline by Analysis Time Point
Mean Change at Week 4 predose (n=117, 104, 110)
4 msec
Standard Error 1.2
9 msec
Standard Error 1.6
3 msec
Standard Error 1.4
PR Interval and Change From Baseline by Analysis Time Point
Mean Change Wk 4 2-3 hrs postdose (n=113,102,106)
1 msec
Standard Error 1.3
6 msec
Standard Error 1.6
1 msec
Standard Error 1.7
PR Interval and Change From Baseline by Analysis Time Point
Mean Change Wk 4 6-12 hrs postdose (n=112,101,105)
2 msec
Standard Error 1.4
6 msec
Standard Error 1.7
2 msec
Standard Error 1.5
PR Interval and Change From Baseline by Analysis Time Point
Mean Change at Week 12 (n=110, 97, 107)
5 msec
Standard Error 1.6
7 msec
Standard Error 1.7
8 msec
Standard Error 1.4
PR Interval and Change From Baseline by Analysis Time Point
Mean Change at Week 24 (n=108, 92, 109)
2 msec
Standard Error 1.3
7 msec
Standard Error 1.7
5 msec
Standard Error 1.6
PR Interval and Change From Baseline by Analysis Time Point
Mean Change at Week 48 (n=89, 75, 97)
0 msec
Standard Error 1.5
2 msec
Standard Error 1.9
4 msec
Standard Error 1.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48

Population: Number of Participants Analyzed=treated participants; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization); n=subset of treated participants (Given the language limitation, a subset of the AI424045 population was included in the MACS adherence analysis.)

The MACS adherence questionnaire asks patients how many medication doses they missed during the previous day, 2 days, 3 days and 4 days. Drug-specific questions included adherence with dose and frequency. Adherence was defined as taking all doses and numbers of pills as prescribed for each medication. This strict adherence cut-off was based on the guidelines stating that anything less than excellent adherence may result in a virus breakthrough and development of resistance.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=40 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=33 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=48 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Adherence to Regimen Though Week 48 Based on MACS the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) Adherence Questionnaire
Adherent at Week 24 (n=18, 11, 25)
10 participants
5 participants
23 participants
Adherence to Regimen Though Week 48 Based on MACS the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) Adherence Questionnaire
Adherent at Baseline (n=27, 25, 33)
12 participants
10 participants
18 participants
Adherence to Regimen Though Week 48 Based on MACS the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) Adherence Questionnaire
Adherent at Week 48 (n=11, 4, 20)
8 participants
2 participants
13 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48

Population: Treated participants; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization). n=number of participants evaluated with EQ-5D at given time point.

The EQ-5D is a 5-item questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in 5 health dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) are scored on a 3-level scale: no problems (1), some problems (2), extreme problems (3). Using a standard algorithm, responses are summarized into a single score, the EQ-5D Health Index Score (HIS), which ranges between 1 (representing perfect health) and 0 (representing the worst imaginable health state or death). The smallest coefficient of change is 0.03.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=119 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=110 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=118 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Mean Score of European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health Index Score at Baseline, Mid-Study (Week 24), and Final (Week 48)
Baseline (n=99, 86, 100)
0.83 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
0.85 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
0.86 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
Mean Score of European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health Index Score at Baseline, Mid-Study (Week 24), and Final (Week 48)
Mid-Study (n=103, 83, 95)
0.87 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
0.86 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.01
Mean Score of European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health Index Score at Baseline, Mid-Study (Week 24), and Final (Week 48)
Final (n=93, 84, 96)
0.84 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
0.85 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
0.88 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.02

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48

Population: Treated participants; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization). n=number of participants evaluated with EQ-5D at given time point.

The EQ-5D has a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), which is a feeling thermometer-like scale with a range between 0 and 100. Patients are required to draw a line from a box on the VAS scale to an actual mark on the thermometer-like scale that corresponds with a number that reflects their self-assessed health status at the time they are completing the questionnaire. Higher VAS scores indicate better overall health. There is no minimum clinically important difference reported in the literature for VAS.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=119 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=110 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
n=118 Participants
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Mean Score of European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Baseline, Mid-Study (Week 24), and Final (Week 48)
Baseline (n=98, 85, 101)
81.33 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.63
81.72 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.77
81.52 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.53
Mean Score of European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Baseline, Mid-Study (Week 24), and Final (Week 48)
Mid-Study (n=102, 83, 97)
84.89 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.65
83.34 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.89
85.09 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.55
Mean Score of European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Baseline, Mid-Study (Week 24), and Final (Week 48)
Final (n=95, 81, 96)
82.77 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.72
85.80 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.64
86.16 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.36

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48

Population: Although the intent of this planned analysis was to provide a model of economic value for Lipid Management, a different approach was taken to create this model which did not require data from this trial, and thus this analysis was not done.

Participants' overall resource utilization for managing lipid elevation that includes the management of side effects of lipid lowering medications, such as those due to drug interactions.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: collected at the pre-dose time point after receiving atazanavir for at least four weeks

Population: Participants with evaluable Cmins; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

The minimum or "trough" concentration (Cmin) of a drug observed after its administration and just prior to the administration of a subsequent dose.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=40 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=23 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Mean ATV, RTV and SQV Minimum Concentration (Cmin) Values
ATV (n=40,23)
719.53 ng/mL
Standard Error 82.81
312.01 ng/mL
Standard Error 145.31
Mean ATV, RTV and SQV Minimum Concentration (Cmin) Values
RTV (n=40,0)
154.83 ng/mL
Standard Error 39.31
NA ng/mL
Standard Error NA
No participants were analyzed in this cohort for RTV because they did not take this drug.
Mean ATV, RTV and SQV Minimum Concentration (Cmin) Values
SQV (n=0,19)
NA ng/mL
Standard Error NA
No participants were analyzed in this cohort for SQV because they did not take this drug.
52.15 ng/mL
Standard Error 16.89

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: Participants with evaluable IC50 measurements; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

IC50: inhibitory concentration of drug required to reduce viral replication by 50%.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=40 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=21 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
HIV IC50 at Week 24
17.83 ng/mL
Standard Error 4.04
22.84 ng/mL
Standard Error 11.65

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Participants with evaluable IQ measurements (ie, must have both Cmin and IC50 measurements); as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Inhibitory quotient is a measure of drug exposure and susceptibility in an individual. The IQ is typically calculated as the ratio of Cmin to HIV IC50.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=40 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=21 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Inhibitory Quotient at Week 24
136.94 ratio
Standard Error 24.33
25.04 ratio
Standard Error 13.33

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Formal population PK/PD analysis was not performed due to difficulties in correlating time of blood sample collection with drug administration, and inability to apply the PK model generated with data obtained from healthy subjects due to newly observed differences in exposure to atazanavir between HIV-infected participants and healthy participants.

Inhibitory quotient is a measure of drug exposure and susceptibility in an individual. The IQ is typically calculated as the ratio of Cmin to HIV IC50.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Participants with evaluable Cmins; as-randomized population (refers to the treatment regimen assigned at randomization).

Week 24 HIV RNA level and change from baseline were summarized for treated subjects with evaluable Cmins.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ATV 300 mg / RTV
n=40 Participants
ATV 300 mg + RTV 100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV 400 mg / SQV
n=23 Participants
ATV 400 mg + SQV 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV / RTV
LPV/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
HIV RNA Level - Treated Subjects With Evaluable Cmins at Week 24
Baseline Values
4.53 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.13
4.41 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.13
HIV RNA Level - Treated Subjects With Evaluable Cmins at Week 24
Week 24 Values
2.62 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.19
2.83 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.25
HIV RNA Level - Treated Subjects With Evaluable Cmins at Week 24
Change from Baseline at Week 24
-1.91 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.19
-1.57 log10 c/mL
Standard Error 0.29

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

Population: Formal population PK/PD analysis was not performed due to difficulties in correlating time of blood sample collection with drug administration, and inability to apply the PK model generated with data obtained from healthy subjects due to newly observed differences in exposure to atazanavir between HIV-infected participants and healthy participants.

Week 24 HIV RNA level and change from baseline were summarized for treated subjects with evaluable Cmins.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

ATV300/RTV

Serious events: 22 serious events
Other events: 101 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

ATV400/SQV

Serious events: 22 serious events
Other events: 95 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

LPV/RTV

Serious events: 19 serious events
Other events: 104 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
ATV300/RTV
n=119 participants at risk
atazanavir (ATV) 300 mg + ritonavir (RTV) 100 mg + tenofovir (TDF) 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV400/SQV
n=110 participants at risk
ATV 400 mg + saquinavir (SQV) 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV/RTV
n=118 participants at risk
lopinavir (LPV)/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROTRUSION
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
DYSPNOEA
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
1.8%
2/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
BRONCHITIS
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
ABSCESS LIMB
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
ANAL ABSCESS
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
SEPTIC SHOCK
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
1.7%
2/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
HERPES ZOSTER
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
NEUROSYPHILIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
HAEMOPTYSIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
OSTEOMYELITIS
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
CRYPTOCOCCOSIS
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
LOBAR PNEUMONIA
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
PYELONEPHRITIS ACUTE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
GASTROENTERITIS VIRAL
1.7%
2/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
MENINGITIS TUBERCULOUS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
OESOPHAGEAL CANDIDIASIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE COLITIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
POSTOPERATIVE WOUND INFECTION
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Renal and urinary disorders
RENAL FAILURE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
1.7%
2/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Renal and urinary disorders
RENAL FAILURE ACUTE
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Renal and urinary disorders
RENAL TUBULAR ACIDOSIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
RESPIRATORY FAILURE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
RESPIRATORY DISTRESS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
General disorders
CYST
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
General disorders
CHILLS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
General disorders
MALAISE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
General disorders
PYREXIA
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
1.7%
2/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
General disorders
CHEST PAIN
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
LYMPHOMA
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Surgical and medical procedures
HOSPITALISATION
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
ANAL CANCER
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DEHYDRATION
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DIABETES MELLITUS
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPERLACTACIDAEMIA
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
CARCINOID TUMOUR OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
METABOLIC ACIDOSIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPERTRIGLYCERIDAEMIA
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
LYMPHADENOPATHY
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
PROSTATITIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
OVARIAN CYST
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
1.8%
2/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
VAGINAL PROLAPSE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
MENSTRUATION IRREGULAR
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
OVERDOSE
1.7%
2/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
1.7%
2/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
HEAD INJURY
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
HIP FRACTURE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
FOOT FRACTURE
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
FEMUR FRACTURE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
SPINAL FRACTURE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
SUBDURAL HAEMATOMA
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
LOWER LIMB FRACTURE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
FEMORAL NECK FRACTURE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
LUMBAR VERTEBRAL FRACTURE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
OSTEONECROSIS
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Eye disorders
GLAUCOMA
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Investigations
WEIGHT DECREASED
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Cardiac disorders
PERICARDITIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Cardiac disorders
CARDIAC FAILURE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Cardiac disorders
CARDIAC TAMPONADE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Cardiac disorders
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Cardiac disorders
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Vascular disorders
ANEURYSM
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Vascular disorders
DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Vascular disorders
PELVIC VENOUS THROMBOSIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Psychiatric disorders
DRUG ABUSE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Psychiatric disorders
ALCOHOL ABUSE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Psychiatric disorders
DRUG DEPENDENCE
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Psychiatric disorders
MAJOR DEPRESSION
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Psychiatric disorders
SUICIDAL IDEATION
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Hepatobiliary disorders
HEPATIC CIRRHOSIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
1.7%
2/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Immune system disorders
HYPERSENSITIVITY
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Nervous system disorders
HEADACHE
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Nervous system disorders
CONVULSION
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Nervous system disorders
TENSION HEADACHE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Nervous system disorders
CAROTID ARTERY STENOSIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Nervous system disorders
DEPRESSED LEVEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
COLITIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
VOMITING
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIARRHOEA
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
1.7%
2/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
GASTRITIS
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
TOOTHACHE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
HAEMATEMESIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
PANCREATITIS
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
INGUINAL HERNIA
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN LOWER
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIARRHOEA HAEMORRHAGIC
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
LOWER GASTROINTESTINAL HAEMORRHAGE
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
SEPSIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
CYSTITIS
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
1.8%
2/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
SINUSITIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
UROSEPSIS
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.91%
1/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
ATV300/RTV
n=119 participants at risk
atazanavir (ATV) 300 mg + ritonavir (RTV) 100 mg + tenofovir (TDF) 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV , RTV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
ATV400/SQV
n=110 participants at risk
ATV 400 mg + saquinavir (SQV) 1200 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice ATV, SQV, and TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
LPV/RTV
n=118 participants at risk
lopinavir (LPV)/RTV 400/100 mg + TDF 300 mg + nucleoside of choice LPV/RTV twice daily, TDF once daily, nucleoside per label 48 Weeks and then for as long as subject is in need of therapy through study
Eye disorders
OCULAR ICTERUS
10.9%
13/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
3.6%
4/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Investigations
LIPASE INCREASED
6.7%
8/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
1.8%
2/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
6.8%
8/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Investigations
WEIGHT DECREASED
8.4%
10/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
8.2%
9/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
11.0%
13/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Investigations
BLOOD BILIRUBIN INCREASED
9.2%
11/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
3.6%
4/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Investigations
BLOOD TRIGLYCERIDES INCREASED
5.9%
7/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
1.8%
2/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
7.6%
9/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Investigations
ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED
1.7%
2/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
1.8%
2/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.1%
6/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Psychiatric disorders
ANXIETY
6.7%
8/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
8.2%
9/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
3.4%
4/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Psychiatric disorders
INSOMNIA
10.1%
12/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.5%
6/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
8.5%
10/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Psychiatric disorders
DEPRESSION
10.1%
12/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
10.0%
11/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
11.9%
14/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Hepatobiliary disorders
JAUNDICE
16.0%
19/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
6.4%
7/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.00%
0/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Hepatobiliary disorders
HYPERBILIRUBINAEMIA
19.3%
23/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
7.3%
8/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Immune system disorders
HYPERSENSITIVITY
0.00%
0/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.5%
6/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
1.7%
2/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Nervous system disorders
HEADACHE
19.3%
23/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
25.5%
28/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
18.6%
22/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Nervous system disorders
DIZZINESS
5.9%
7/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
8.2%
9/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.9%
7/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Nervous system disorders
PARAESTHESIA
4.2%
5/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
4.5%
5/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
8.5%
10/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Nervous system disorders
HYPOAESTHESIA
1.7%
2/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
1.8%
2/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
6.8%
8/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Nervous system disorders
NEUROPATHY PERIPHERAL
4.2%
5/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
3.6%
4/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.9%
7/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
NAUSEA
19.3%
23/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
27.3%
30/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
15.3%
18/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
VOMITING
13.4%
16/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
15.5%
17/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
10.2%
12/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIARRHOEA
25.2%
30/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
30.9%
34/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
53.4%
63/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DYSPEPSIA
5.9%
7/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
9.1%
10/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.1%
6/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
GASTRITIS
0.84%
1/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.5%
6/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
0.85%
1/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
FLATULENCE
5.0%
6/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
7.3%
8/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.1%
6/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN
5.9%
7/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
10.9%
12/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
8.5%
10/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL DISTENSION
5.0%
6/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
7.3%
8/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
6.8%
8/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN UPPER
4.2%
5/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
14.5%
16/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.9%
7/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
INFLUENZA
16.8%
20/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
15.5%
17/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
11.9%
14/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA
5.0%
6/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
4.5%
5/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
2.5%
3/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
SINUSITIS
12.6%
15/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
12.7%
14/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
16.1%
19/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
BRONCHITIS
10.9%
13/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
10.9%
12/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
14.4%
17/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
PHARYNGITIS
6.7%
8/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
6.4%
7/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.9%
7/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
GASTROENTERITIS
1.7%
2/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
3.6%
4/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.9%
7/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
NASOPHARYNGITIS
14.3%
17/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
11.8%
13/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
16.1%
19/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
8.4%
10/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
8.2%
9/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
7.6%
9/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Infections and infestations
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
5.9%
7/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
4.5%
5/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
11.9%
14/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DECREASED APPETITE
5.9%
7/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
10.9%
12/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
10.2%
12/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPERTRIGLYCERIDAEMIA
6.7%
8/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.5%
6/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
6.8%
8/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
RASH
5.9%
7/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
9.1%
10/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
10.2%
12/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
PRURITUS
3.4%
4/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
6.4%
7/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.1%
6/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
LIPOATROPHY
1.7%
2/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.5%
6/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
4.2%
5/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
LIPODYSTROPHY ACQUIRED
7.6%
9/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
9.1%
10/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
9.3%
11/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MYALGIA
10.1%
12/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.5%
6/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
7.6%
9/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN
12.6%
15/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
11.8%
13/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
11.0%
13/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ARTHRALGIA
8.4%
10/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
9.1%
10/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.9%
7/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
PAIN IN EXTREMITY
4.2%
5/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
6.4%
7/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
3.4%
4/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
COUGH
11.8%
14/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
8.2%
9/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
14.4%
17/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
OROPHARYNGEAL PAIN
7.6%
9/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
4.5%
5/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
9.3%
11/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
General disorders
FATIGUE
7.6%
9/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
9.1%
10/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
8.5%
10/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
General disorders
PYREXIA
16.0%
19/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
8.2%
9/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
8.5%
10/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
General disorders
ASTHENIA
5.9%
7/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
6.4%
7/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
7.6%
9/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
General disorders
OEDEMA PERIPHERAL
1.7%
2/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
1.8%
2/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
5.1%
6/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
General disorders
INFLUENZA LIKE ILLNESS
6.7%
8/119 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
3.6%
4/110 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.
3.4%
4/118 • The AE data below represents data from start of study in November 2001 through the last locked database of the study, 18 November 2009.

Additional Information

BMS Study Director

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. agreements with investigators vary; constant is our right to embargo communications regarding trial results prior to public release for a period ≤60 days from submittal for review. We will not prohibit investigators from publishing, but will prohibit the disclosure of previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results, and request postponement of single-center publications until after disclosure of the clinical trial's primary publication.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER