Trial Outcomes & Findings for Permeability Factor in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (NCT NCT00007475)
NCT ID: NCT00007475
Last Updated: 2016-02-10
Results Overview
Outcomes for FSGS occurring in native kidneys: A. Complete remission: proteinuria \<0.3 g/d ; B. Partial remission: proteinuria between 0.3 and 2 g/d ; C. Incomplete response: proteinuria between 2 and 3.5 g/d ; D. Relapse: return to proteinuria ≥3.5 g/d ; Note that counts within each category A-D may be summarized relative to remaining categories, as a proportion (relative to complement of the whole group count) with calculations implicitly based on zero/one valued binary variables, whose means are proportions, so to report 95% confidence intervals calculated using an exact binomial distribution.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
15 participants
every 3 months up to a year followed with native kidneys
2016-02-10
Participant Flow
Enrollment of subjects occurred at fraction of the anticipated rate despite over a decade of study conduct; the discrepancy between actual (15) and projected (100) enrollment is due to (a) lack of revising the registry entry with revisions of the protocol (n=50, excluding historical controls) and (b) lower referral rates by external nephrologists.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
FPF NOT Assayed, Plasma Exchange + Cyclophosphamide Completed
Participants not assayed for FSGS Permeability Factor (FPF) levels pre-treatment (Tx), yet still complete both series of protocol-specified treatment; FPF levels NOT available as its assay has not yet been developed to an extent that it could be applied to all enrollees of this current trial
|
FPF Assayed Pre-Tx as Low, PE + Cyclophosphamide Completed
Protocol Groups A/B/C (FPF \< 0.6); group size is limited due to limited availability of provisionally validated FPF assay and discrepancy with protocol groups due to low-FPF participants receiving PE and Cyclophosphamide (contrast to protocol Figure 1)
|
FPF Assayed Pre-Tx as High, PE + Cyclophosphamide Completed
Protocol Group D (FPF 0.6 or greater pre-initial Transplant); group size is limited due to limited availability of provisionally validated FPF assay and discrepancy with protocol groups due to low-FPF participants receiving PE and Cyclophosphamide (contrast to protocol Figure 1)
|
Historical Controls
Noted as Group F in study protocol: historical control patients, including patients at NIH or other institutions who have previously undergone renal transplant, for whom stored sera are available, and for whom consent to measure FPF has been can be obtained. In some cases, these measurements have been performed by Dr. Savin under pre-existing protocols and these data are already available.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
12
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
FSGS Permeability Factor (FPF) Assayed
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Initial Transplant
|
12
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Post-initial Transplant Proteinuria
|
12
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Initial Plasma Exchange
|
12
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Initiate Cyclophosphamide
|
12
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
8
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
FPF NOT Assayed, Plasma Exchange + Cyclophosphamide Completed
Participants not assayed for FSGS Permeability Factor (FPF) levels pre-treatment (Tx), yet still complete both series of protocol-specified treatment; FPF levels NOT available as its assay has not yet been developed to an extent that it could be applied to all enrollees of this current trial
|
FPF Assayed Pre-Tx as Low, PE + Cyclophosphamide Completed
Protocol Groups A/B/C (FPF \< 0.6); group size is limited due to limited availability of provisionally validated FPF assay and discrepancy with protocol groups due to low-FPF participants receiving PE and Cyclophosphamide (contrast to protocol Figure 1)
|
FPF Assayed Pre-Tx as High, PE + Cyclophosphamide Completed
Protocol Group D (FPF 0.6 or greater pre-initial Transplant); group size is limited due to limited availability of provisionally validated FPF assay and discrepancy with protocol groups due to low-FPF participants receiving PE and Cyclophosphamide (contrast to protocol Figure 1)
|
Historical Controls
Noted as Group F in study protocol: historical control patients, including patients at NIH or other institutions who have previously undergone renal transplant, for whom stored sera are available, and for whom consent to measure FPF has been can be obtained. In some cases, these measurements have been performed by Dr. Savin under pre-existing protocols and these data are already available.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Permeability Factor in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
FPF NOT Assayed Provisionally, PE + Cyclophosphamide Completed
n=12 Participants
Participants not provisionally assayed for FPF, yet still complete both series of protocol treatment: Plasma Exchange (PE) and Cyclophosphamide; note that these form a majority of enrollees due to limited availability of validated FPF assay (such an assay has not yet been developed to an extent that it could be applied to all enrollees of this current trial; see Outcome Measures for more details)
|
FPF Assayed Pre-Tx as Low, PE + Cyclophosphamide Completed
n=1 Participants
Protocol Groups A/B/C (FPF \< 0.6); group size is limited due to limited availability of validated FPF assay and discrepancy with protocol groups due to low-FPF participants receiving PE and Cyclophosphamide (contrast to protocol Figure 1)
|
FPF Assayed Pre-Tx as High, PE + Cyclophosphamide Completed
n=2 Participants
Protocol Group D (FPF 0.6 or greater pre-initial Transplant); group size is limited due to limited availability of validated FPF assay
|
Total
n=15 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
39.5 years at consent
n=5 Participants
|
63 years at consent
n=7 Participants
|
19 years at consent
n=5 Participants
|
37 years at consent
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Treated for Prior Recurrence
Yes
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Treated for Prior Recurrence
No
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Time from onset/diagnosis of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis to study enrollment/consent
|
10 years
n=5 Participants
|
6 years
n=7 Participants
|
1.5 years
n=5 Participants
|
8 years
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: every 3 months up to a year followed with native kidneysPopulation: all participants, regardless of amount of follow-up
Outcomes for FSGS occurring in native kidneys: A. Complete remission: proteinuria \<0.3 g/d ; B. Partial remission: proteinuria between 0.3 and 2 g/d ; C. Incomplete response: proteinuria between 2 and 3.5 g/d ; D. Relapse: return to proteinuria ≥3.5 g/d ; Note that counts within each category A-D may be summarized relative to remaining categories, as a proportion (relative to complement of the whole group count) with calculations implicitly based on zero/one valued binary variables, whose means are proportions, so to report 95% confidence intervals calculated using an exact binomial distribution.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
FPF NOT Assayed, Plasma Exchange + Cyclophosphamide Completed
n=12 Participants
Participants complete both series of protocol treatment, Plasma Exchange and Cyclophosphamide.
|
FPF Assayed Pre-Tx as Low, PE + Cyclophosphamide Completed
n=1 Participants
Protocol Groups A/B/C (FPF \< 0.6); group size is limited due to limited availability of validated FPF assay and discrepancy with protocol groups due to low-FPF participants receiving PE and Cyclophosphamide (contrast to protocol Figure 1)
|
FPF Assayed Pre-Tx as High, PE + Cyclophosphamide Completed
n=2 Participants
Protocol Group D (FPF 0.6 or greater pre-initial Transplant)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Reduction in Proteinuria in Recurrent FSGS Following Renal Transplant With Plasma Exchange and Cyclophosphamide.
A. Complete remission: proteinuria <0.3 g/d
|
0 proportion of participants with outcome
Interval 0.0 to 0.00049
|
0 proportion of participants with outcome
Interval 0.0 to 0.975
|
0.5 proportion of participants with outcome
Interval 0.01258 to 0.9874
|
|
Reduction in Proteinuria in Recurrent FSGS Following Renal Transplant With Plasma Exchange and Cyclophosphamide.
B. Partial remission: proteinuria in [0.3,2] g/d
|
0.25 proportion of participants with outcome
Interval 0.05486 to 0.5719
|
0 proportion of participants with outcome
Interval 0.0 to 0.975
|
0 proportion of participants with outcome
Interval 0.0 to 0.8419
|
|
Reduction in Proteinuria in Recurrent FSGS Following Renal Transplant With Plasma Exchange and Cyclophosphamide.
C. Incomplete response: proteinuria in (2,3.5) g/d
|
0 proportion of participants with outcome
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
0 proportion of participants with outcome
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
0 proportion of participants with outcome
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
|
Reduction in Proteinuria in Recurrent FSGS Following Renal Transplant With Plasma Exchange and Cyclophosphamide.
D. Relapse: return to proteinuria ≥3.5 g/d
|
0.1667 proportion of participants with outcome
Interval 0.02086 to 0.4841
|
1 proportion of participants with outcome
Interval 0.025 to 1.0
|
0 proportion of participants with outcome
Interval 0.0 to 0.8419
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: End of studyPopulation: Participants with FPF, without FPF and control subjects who have also had RNA expression profiling done in PBMCs.
No RNA expression profiles have been obtained as FSGS Permeability Factor (FPF) levels NOT available -- its assay has not yet been developed to an extent that it could be applied to all enrollees of this current trial. Note that provisional values (targeting current candidate molecule: cardiotrophin-like cytokine 1) were assayed for 3 of the first 4 enrollees using assay by Dr. Virginia Savin, whose lab is actively investigating a molecular identification of FPF using an isolation approach based on sequential precipitation results in a 100-fold purification, but the fraction remains a complex mixture on SDS-PAGE (Sharma 1999). Other investigators of FPF include: 1. Terry Phillips at NIH developed an assay that looked promising but after his retirement it has not been possible for other researchers to get this working. 2. Avi Rosenberg, NCI has developed a promising ELISA-style assay, as well as some work in a mass spectrometry assay, and this is being further refined.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: End of studyProvisional assay of a molecular identification of FPF (current candidate: cardiotrophin-like cytokine 1) using an isolation approach based on sequential precipitation results in a 100-fold purification. Note: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis Permeability Factor (FPF) assay had not yet been developed to an extent that it could be applied to all enrollees in the current trial; provisional values were assayed for 3 of the first 4 enrollees using a version implemented by Dr. Virginia Savin, whose lab is actively investigating the above isolation approach, but the fraction remains a complex mixture on SDS-PAGE (Sharma 1999). Other investigators of FPF, mentioned here for interested readers of this trial report, include: 1. Terry Phillips at NIH developed an assay that looked promising prior to his retirement. 2. Avi Rosenberg, NCI has developed promising ELISA-style assay, and mass spectrometry assay, being refined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
FPF NOT Assayed, Plasma Exchange + Cyclophosphamide Completed
Participants complete both series of protocol treatment, Plasma Exchange and Cyclophosphamide.
|
FPF Assayed Pre-Tx as Low, PE + Cyclophosphamide Completed
n=1 Participants
Protocol Groups A/B/C (FPF \< 0.6); group size is limited due to limited availability of validated FPF assay and discrepancy with protocol groups due to low-FPF participants receiving PE and Cyclophosphamide (contrast to protocol Figure 1)
|
FPF Assayed Pre-Tx as High, PE + Cyclophosphamide Completed
n=2 Participants
Protocol Group D (FPF 0.6 or greater pre-initial Transplant)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Define the Kinetics of FPF in FSGS Patients Receiving Immunomodulatory Therapy or Plasma Exchange.
|
—
|
0.41 1- albumin glomerular permeability ratio
Interval 0.41 to 0.41
|
0.865 1- albumin glomerular permeability ratio
Interval 0.82 to 0.91
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: End of studyPopulation: Participants with FPF levels assayed following immunosuppressive therapies (currently none). Note: its assay had not yet been developed to an extent that it could be applied beyond the provisional values assayed for 3 of the first 4 enrollees using a version implemented by Dr.Virginia Savin, VA Medical Center/Kidney Institute, Kansas City, Missouri
Provisional assay of a molecular identification of FPF (current candidate: cardiotrophin-like cytokine 1) using an isolation approach based on sequential precipitation results in a 100-fold purification. Note: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis Permeability Factor (FPF) assay had not yet been developed to an extent that it could be applied to all enrollees in the current trial; provisional values were assayed for 3 of the first 4 enrollees using a version implemented by Dr. Virginia Savin, whose lab is actively investigating the above isolation approach, but the fraction remains a complex mixture on SDS-PAGE (Sharma 1999). Other investigators of FPF, mentioned here for interested readers of this trial report, include: 1. Terry Phillips at NIH developed an assay that looked promising prior to his retirement. 2. Avi Rosenberg, NCI has developed promising ELISA-style assay, and mass spectrometry assay, being refined.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: End of studyPopulation: Participants whose post-transplantation follow-up yields 1 or more assayed FPF levels
Provisional assay of a molecular identification of FPF (current candidate: cardiotrophin-like cytokine 1) using an isolation approach based on sequential precipitation results in a 100-fold purification. Note: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis Permeability Factor (FPF) assay had not yet been developed to an extent that it could be applied to all enrollees in the current trial; provisional values were assayed for 3 of the first 4 enrollees using a version implemented by Dr. Virginia Savin, whose lab is actively investigating the above isolation approach, but the fraction remains a complex mixture on SDS-PAGE (Sharma 1999). Other investigators of FPF, mentioned here for interested readers of this trial report, include: 1. Terry Phillips at NIH developed an assay that looked promising prior to his retirement. 2. Avi Rosenberg, NCI has developed promising ELISA-style assay, and mass spectrometry assay, being refined.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Plasma Exchange + Cyclophosphamide, Complete Treatment
FPF Assayed Pre-Tx as Low, PE + Cyclophosphamide Completed
FPF Assayed Pre-Tx as High, PE + Cyclophosphamide Completed
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Plasma Exchange + Cyclophosphamide, Complete Treatment
n=12 participants at risk
Participants for whom the Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) Permeability Factor, or FPF was not able to be assayed, yet enrolled and completed both protocol-specified interventions: the plasma exchange procedure and treatment by cyclophosphamide.
|
FPF Assayed Pre-Tx as Low, PE + Cyclophosphamide Completed
n=1 participants at risk
Original protocol Groups A/B/C (FPF \< 0.6); group size is limited due to limited availability of validated FPF assay and discrepancy with protocol groups due to low-FPF participants receiving PE and Cyclophosphamide (contrast to protocol Figure 1)
|
FPF Assayed Pre-Tx as High, PE + Cyclophosphamide Completed
n=2 participants at risk
Original protocol Group D (FPF 0.6 or greater pre-initial Transplant)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Immune system disorders
Rejection of Kidney Graft
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Entire course of study follow-up, from study enrollment to closure
|
0.00%
0/1 • Entire course of study follow-up, from study enrollment to closure
|
0.00%
0/2 • Entire course of study follow-up, from study enrollment to closure
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hemorrhagic cystitis
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Entire course of study follow-up, from study enrollment to closure
|
0.00%
0/1 • Entire course of study follow-up, from study enrollment to closure
|
0.00%
0/2 • Entire course of study follow-up, from study enrollment to closure
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate Gland
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Entire course of study follow-up, from study enrollment to closure
|
0.00%
0/1 • Entire course of study follow-up, from study enrollment to closure
|
0.00%
0/2 • Entire course of study follow-up, from study enrollment to closure
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • Entire course of study follow-up, from study enrollment to closure
|
0.00%
0/1 • Entire course of study follow-up, from study enrollment to closure
|
0.00%
0/2 • Entire course of study follow-up, from study enrollment to closure
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Jeffrey B. Kopp, MD
National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place