Prognostic Significance of T Wave Alternans

NCT ID: NCT00006501

Last Updated: 2015-12-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

549 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-01-31

Study Completion Date

2012-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate whether T Wave Alternans can predict ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in a prospective epidemiologic natural history study.

The prospective epidemiologic pilot study included 550 patients that had left ventricular dysfunction and no history of sustained ventricular arrhythmias. The primary hypothesis tested was whether there was an increased risk of having an arrhythmic event when T Wave Alternans was present in the patient. The secondary aims included comparing risk due to T Wave Alternans between the ischemic patients and non-ischemic patients and assessing whether T Wave Alternans remained an independent predictor of risk upon adjustment for other known risk factors for arrhythmic events such as ejection fraction, ventricular ectopy, NSVT, average NN interval, and RR interval variability.

The study approach was a standard epidemiologic surveillance technique. The subject population consisted of individuals with Class I to III heart failure who will underwent a TWA and Holter monitor test and then were followed for up to two years or until arrhythmic events occured.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sudden cardiac death accounts for approximately 400,000 deaths each year in the United States and remains a health problem of epidemic proportions. Most sudden cardiac deaths are caused by fatal ventricular arrhythmias. An effort aimed at the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death requires efficient identification of patients who are at high enough risk for having these arrhythmias to warrant aggressive prophylactic therapy. A number of recently completed, randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) can prevent sudden cardiac death in a highly selected group of high-risk patients. When these trials are viewed together, the only patients in whom the prophylactic implantation of an ICD has proven benefit are those patients identified by documented, spontaneous or inducible, sustained ventricular arrhythmias.

Two randomized treatment trials (MADIT II, SCD-HEFT) tested the hypothesis that implantation of an ICD would reduce mortality in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and left ventricular dysfunction without any further risk tratification. However, the implications of these two trials-implantation of an ICD in every patient with CHF-were unlikely to be accepted either by the medical community or by health care payers. More efficient methods of risk stratification were necessary to identify those patients with CHF who were most likely to benefit from prophylactic treatment with an ICD.

T Wave Alternans is a subtle every-other-beat variation in electrocardiographic T waves that is prognostic of patients at high risk for life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. It has recently been shown that T Wave Alternans (TWA) measured during exercise is strongly associated with inducible monomorphic CVT and with subsequent spontaneous arrhythmic events. This preliminary data suggest that TWA may be an efficient and non-invasive surrogate for electrophysiologic testing to screen patients who may be at high-risk for sudden cardiac death.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Diseases Ventricular Arrhythmia Ventricular Fibrillation Death, Sudden, Cardiac Heart Arrest

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ECG recording

After the tests are completed, people who enroll in this study are followed by telephone, 1, 4, 8, 12 16, 20 and 24 months. During these follow-up telephone calls a research coordinator asks about the participant's health condition and about cardiovascular medications that are being taken.

ECG

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A diagnostic tool that is routinely used to assess the electrical and muscular functions of the heart (non-experimental).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ECG

A diagnostic tool that is routinely used to assess the electrical and muscular functions of the heart (non-experimental).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Electrocardiogram

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with left ventricular dusfunction
2. Patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy

Exclusion Criteria

1\. Patients not at high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Bigger

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor Emeritus of Medicine and Pharmacology, Columbia University

John Bigger

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Columbia University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bloomfield DM, Bigger JT, Steinman RC, Namerow PB, Parides MK, Curtis AB, Kaufman ES, Davidenko JM, Shinn TS, Fontaine JM. Microvolt T-wave alternans and the risk of death or sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jan 17;47(2):456-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.026. Epub 2005 Dec 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16412877 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01HL064862

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

AAAB1399

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id