Second-look Surgery With or Without Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Recurrent Colorectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00005944

Last Updated: 2021-02-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1999-07-01

Study Completion Date

2003-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Giving chemotherapy drugs in different ways may kill more tumor cells.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase II trial to compare the effectiveness of second-look surgery with or without intraperitoneal infusions of mitomycin and fluorouracil in treating patients who have colorectal cancer that is recurrent to the peritoneum.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the effect of second look surgery with or without intraperitoneal mitomycin and fluorouracil on the 3 year survival rate of patients with colorectal cancer who are at high risk for peritoneal cavity cancer. II. Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens. III. Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to center, risk group, presence of symptoms (yes vs no), and isolated disease (yes vs no). After primary surgery, all patients receive 6 months of chemotherapy consisting of leucovorin calcium IV followed by fluorouracil IV over 10 minutes on days 1-5 every 4 weeks. Patients then undergo second look surgery or laparoscopy at 8-12 months. Second look surgery or laparoscopy may be performed earlier if markers increase progressively for unknown reasons or symptoms of peritoneal cancer occur. Patients with recurrent disease that can be resected are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Patients with no residual disease or with unresectable disease are followed for survival. Arm I: Patients undergo complete resection of all detectable lesions followed immediately by intraperitoneal (IP) mitomycin on day 0 and fluorouracil IP on days 1-4. Patients also receive systemic chemotherapy consisting of leucovorin calcium IV over 2 hours and fluorouracil IV bolus, followed by fluorouracil IV over 22 hours on days 1 and 2. Systemic chemotherapy repeats every 2 weeks for 6 months. Arm II: Patients undergo complete or partial resection and then receive systemic chemotherapy as in arm I. Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then every 4 months for 3 years. All patients (including nonrandomized patients) are followed every 4 months for 3 years.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 152 patients (76 randomized) will be accrued for this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer Metastatic Cancer Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

fluorouracil

Intervention Type DRUG

leucovorin calcium

Intervention Type DRUG

mitomycin C

Intervention Type DRUG

conventional surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

laparoscopic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Primary diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum and meeting one of the following risk criteria during the primary surgery: Perforated bowel (spontaneous or not) Occlusion Peritoneal deposits Invasion of serosa of more than 4 cm diameter Concurrent ovarian metastases Randomization eligibility: Presence of proven recurrent peritoneal disease (only one micronodule of 1 mm sufficient) at second look laparotomy Total resection of macroscopic lesions possible (local recurrence, lymph node or hepatic metastases)

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 70 and under Performance status: Not specified Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: WBC at least 1,500/mm3 Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Creatinine no greater than 1.4 mg/dL Cardiovascular: No cardiac condition that would increase surgical risk Pulmonary: No pulmonary condition that would increase surgical risk Other: No other condition that would increase surgical risk No other malignancy within the past 5 years except basal cell skin cancer

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: No concurrent immunotherapy Chemotherapy: No other concurrent chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: No concurrent hormonal therapy Radiotherapy: No concurrent anticancer radiotherapy Surgery: See Disease Characteristics
Minimum Eligible Age

0 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UNICANCER

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dominique Elias, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Sart-Tilman

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

CHR de Besancon - Hopital Jean Minjoz

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Institut Bergonie

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

CHU Ambroise Pare

Boulogne-Billancourt, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Regional de Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

Centre Leon Berard

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Institut J. Paoli and I. Calmettes

Marseille, , France

Site Status

CHU de la Timone

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Centre Regional de Lutte Contre le Cancer - Centre Val d'Aurelle

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

CHR Hotel Dieu

Nantes, , France

Site Status

CRLCC Nantes - Atlantique

Nantes-Saint Herblain, , France

Site Status

Hopital L'Archet - 2

Nice, , France

Site Status

C.H.R. de Nimes - Hopital Caremeau

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

CHR D'Orleans - Hopital de la Source

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire

Reims, , France

Site Status

Centre Paul Strauss

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Institut Gustave Roussy

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FRE-FNCLCC-97018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EU-20010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000067833

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.