High-Dose Intravenous (IV) Cyclophosphamide Versus Monthly IV Cyclophosphamide

NCT ID: NCT00005778

Last Updated: 2008-11-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2000-01-31

Study Completion Date

2006-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares the effectiveness of high-dose cyclophosphamide treatment with the "gold standard" treatment, monthly intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide, in people with moderate to severe lupus that does not respond to high-dose corticosteroid therapy. We will give patients either IV cyclophosphamide (750 milligrams per square meter of body surface area) monthly for 6 months, followed by quarterly maintenance therapy, or high-dose IV cyclophosphamide (50 milligrams per kilogram body weight per day) for the first four days of the study. Patients will be followed for 24 months after therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE or lupus) remains the prototypic autoimmune disease. Recent data show that its incidence has tripled since 1970 and its prevalence is 1 in 800 in Rochester, Minnesota. The natural history of lupus in our cohort is one of (1) relapsing/ remitting or (2) chronic activity, with only 17 percent of patients having periods of long quiescence. Over 75 percent of our African-American patients and 50 percent of our Caucasian patients have renal (kidney) involvement. Over 50 percent suffer permanent damage in one or more organ systems, and over 15 percent have renal failure.

Researchers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have shown that, for patients with severe lupus, especially with renal involvement, monthly IV pulse cyclophosphamide (500 to 1000 mg/m squared BSA) for 6 months followed by quarterly maintenance for 2 years is superior to high-dose corticosteroid treatment. NIH and others have shown that IV pulse cyclophosphamide is also effective for severe lupus in other organs. However, even monthly IV cyclophosphamide is not successful in all cases, and it, too, has associated toxicity, especially premature ovarian failure. For that reason, we have pioneered the use of high-dose immunoablative cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg) in 10 patients with severe lupus refractory to other treatments.

Because of the initial success of this approach, including 75 percent complete response (on no medications) in renal lupus, we are conducting a controlled trial of high-dose immunoablative cyclophosphamide versus the "gold standard" monthly IV cyclophosphamide in people with moderate to severe lupus refractory to high-dose corticosteroid therapy. We will give patients either 750 mg/m2 of body surface area IV cyclophosphamide monthly for 6 months, followed by quarterly maintenance therapy (we will readmit patients, if necessary, for infections or other complications) or cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg/d intravenously on days 1-4. We will calculate the dose of cyclophosphamide according to ideal body weight. Patients are scheduled to receive only one course of therapy. We will follow patients according to the infective guidelines for BMT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Cytoxan Cyclophosphamide High-dose immunoablative therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High-dose immunoablative therapy

1. High dose cyclophosphamide for 4 days.
2. NIH monthly IV cytoxan for 6 months followed by quarterly for 2 years.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Four or more ACR criteria (90), as revised by Hochberg (91) for the classification of SLE.
* Involvement of one or more of the following organ systems (renal, neurologic, hematologic, cardiac, pulmonary, cutaneous, gastrointestinal) of moderate-to-severe severity as indicated by an "A" score on the BILAG, a "2" or "3" for severity on SLAM, or severe enough to require hospitalization if the organ involvement was not "captured" on either the BILAG or SLAM instruments.
* A lack of response to daily corticosteroids in moderate-to-high doses (0.5 -1 mg prednisone/kg/day or equivalent anti-inflammatory dose of methyprednisolone, dexamethasone, or triamicinolone). When cyclophosphamide is the accepted standard of care (renal and neurologic), the maximally tolerated dose of prednisone will be sufficient to meet the corticosteroid criterion. The ideal body weight will be used for this criterion in patients who are morbidly obese. The equivalent dose of triamcinolone (4mg triamcinolone=5mg prednisone) can be used to meet the criterion.

And/or:

* A lack of response to IV pulse corticosteroids (1 gram methylprednisolone or 180 mg dexamethasone).
* Duration of treatment to determine lack of response is 3 days or longer for neurologic, renal, hematologic, pulmonary, or cardiac lupus, one month or longer for serositis.

And/or:

* Equivalent degree of immunosuppression with azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclosporin, or mycophenolate mofetil. Equivalent degrees of immunosuppression are: azathioprine - 100 mg daily or more; methotrexate - 7.5 mg weekly or more; cyclosporin - 150 mg daily or more; mycophenolate mofetil - 1000 mg daily or more. Duration to determine lack of response should be one month or longer.

And/or:

* Appropriate other treatment (such as intravenous immunoglobulin for hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia).
* SLE patients seeking treatment for neurological complaints will be evaluated by a neurologist to concur that the patient meets eligibility criteria.
* Appropriate other treatment for cutaneous lupus patients may include combination antimalarial drugs (such as the combination of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with quinacrine).
* Patients may enter the trial if they received one dose of IV cyclophosphamide to "temporize" or "stablize" them prior to screening visit or after signing consent or if previous IV cyclophosphamide was for a PAST organ system, and patient presents with NEW organ system requiring IV cyclophosphamide.
* Insurance or other source of funds to pay for expenses related to this trial.

Exlcusion Criteria:

* Age less than 18 years and over 70 years.
* Any risk of pregnancy - ALL female patients must have an effective means of birth control or be infertile due to hysterectomy, fallopian tube surgery, or menopause.
* Previous completion of the NIH IV cyclophosphamide protocol.
* Cardiac ejection fraction \< 45%.
* Serum creatinine \> 3.0 mg/dL.
* FVC or FEV \< 50% predicted.
* Bilirubin \> 2.0, transaminases \> 2x normal.
* Patients who are preterminal or moribund.
* SLE patients presenting with arthritis for entry organ system.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Johns Hopkins University

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michelle Petri, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Johns Hopkins University Division of Rheumatology

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Drexel University School of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical College of Wisconsin, Division of Rheumatology

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Brodsky RA, Petri M, Smith BD, Seifter EJ, Spivak JL, Styler M, Dang CV, Brodsky I, Jones RJ. Immunoablative high-dose cyclophosphamide without stem-cell rescue for refractory, severe autoimmune disease. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Dec 15;129(12):1031-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-12-199812150-00007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9867758 (View on PubMed)

Brodsky RA, Sensenbrenner LL, Jones RJ. Complete remission in severe aplastic anemia after high-dose cyclophosphamide without bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 1996 Jan 15;87(2):491-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8555470 (View on PubMed)

Brodsky RA, Smith BD. Bone marrow transplantation for autoimmune diseases. Curr Opin Oncol. 1999 Mar;11(2):83-6. doi: 10.1097/00001622-199903000-00002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10188071 (View on PubMed)

Levite M, Zinger H, Zisman E, Reisner Y, Mozes E. Beneficial effects of bone marrow transplantation on the serological manifestations and kidney pathology of experimental systemic lupus erythematosus. Cell Immunol. 1995 Apr 15;162(1):138-45. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1995.1061.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7704902 (View on PubMed)

Petri M, Jones RJ, Brodsky RA. High-dose cyclophosphamide without stem cell transplantation in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Jan;48(1):166-73. doi: 10.1002/art.10752.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12528116 (View on PubMed)

Petri M. Cyclophosphamide: new approaches for systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2004;13(5):366-71. doi: 10.1191/0961203303lu1028oa.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15230294 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NIAMS-046

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

N01 AR92243

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id