Fluorouracil, Gemcitabine, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Cancer of the Pancreas

NCT ID: NCT00003216

Last Updated: 2013-11-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

518 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1998-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Combining radiation therapy with chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is most effective for pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of fluorouracil and gemcitabine plus radiation therapy in treating patients with cancer of the pancreas who have undergone surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

* Compare the overall and disease-free survival of patients with resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy preceded and followed by fluorouracil vs gemcitabine.
* Compare the local-regional and distant disease control in patients treated with these regimens.
* Compare the acute and late toxic effects of these regimens in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to nodal involvement (yes vs no), tumor diameter (less than 3 cm vs 3 cm or greater), and surgical margins (negative vs positive vs unknown). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.

* Arm I: Beginning 3-8 weeks after definitive surgical resection, patients receive fluorouracil IV continuously for 3 weeks. Beginning 1-2 weeks later, patients receive fluorouracil IV continuously concurrently with radiotherapy 5 days a week for 5.5 weeks. Beginning 3-5 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients receive fluorouracil IV continuously for 4 weeks every 6 weeks for 2 courses.
* Arm II: Beginning 3-8 weeks after definitive surgical resection, patients receive gemcitabine IV once weekly for 3 weeks. Beginning 1-2 weeks later, patients receive chemoradiotherapy as in arm I. Beginning 3-5 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients receive gemcitabine IV once weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks for 3 courses.

Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 518 patients will be accrued for this study within 8.6 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

stage I pancreatic cancer stage II pancreatic cancer stage III pancreatic cancer adenocarcinoma of the pancreas stage IV pancreatic cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

fluorouracil

Intervention Type DRUG

gemcitabine hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

* Stage T1-4, N0-1 (stage I-IVA)
* No M1 or NX staging
* Primary tumor of the pancreas (pancreatic head, neck, uncinate process, or body/tail) and maximum diameter/dimension and tumor status at surgical margin known
* Prior potentially curative gross resection within 3-8 weeks before study
* No non-adenocarcinomas, adenosquamous carcinomas, islet cell carcinomas, cystadenomas, cystadenocarcinomas, carcinoid tumors, duodenal carcinomas, distal bile duct carcinoma, or ampullary carcinoma
* No recurrent disease
* Post-resection CA-19-9 level required

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age:

* 18 and over

Performance status:

* Karnofsky 60-100%

Life expectancy:

* Not specified

Hematopoietic:

* WBC at least 3,000/mm\^3
* Platelet count at least 100,000/mm\^3

Hepatic:

* Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
* SGOT no greater than 5 times ULN

Renal:

* Creatinine no greater than 1.5 times ULN

Other:

* No significant nausea or vomiting
* No prior malignancy within the past 5 years except nonmelanomatous skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
* Able to maintain adequate nutrition (at least 1,500 calories/day)

* Feeding tube allowed
* Not pregnant
* Negative pregnancy test
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy:

* Not specified

Chemotherapy:

* No prior chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy:

* Not specified

Radiotherapy:

* No prior radiotherapy

Surgery:

* See Disease Characteristics
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

SWOG Cancer Research Network

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

William F. Regine, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Lucille P. Markey Cancer Center at University of Kentucky

Al B. Benson, MD, FACP

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center

John S. MacDonald, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Beth Israel Comprehensive Cancer Center - West Side Campus

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

MBCCOP - Gulf Coast

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Greater Phoenix

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Phoenix (Carl T. Hayden)

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Tucson

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Arizona Cancer Center

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Little Rock (McClellan)

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center

Duarte, California, United States

Site Status

USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - West Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic - Martinez

Martinez, California, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Bay Area Tumor Institute

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

University of California Davis Medical Center

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital

Santa Rosa, California, United States

Site Status

David Grant Medical Center

Travis Air Force Base, California, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado Cancer Center

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Denver

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

MBCCOP - Howard University Cancer Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Atlanta Regional

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center

Fort Gordon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Cancer Research Center of Hawaii

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Tripler Army Medical Center

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

MBCCOP - University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Chicago (Westside Hospital)

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Central Illinois

Decatur, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Hines (Hines Junior VA Hospital)

Hines, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Loyola University Medical Center

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Wichita

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Wichita

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Lexington

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, University of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

MBCCOP - LSU Medical Center

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Tulane University School of Medicine

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - New Orleans

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center - Shreveport

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Shreveport

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Boston Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Boston (Jamaica Plain)

Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Ann Arbor

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Ann Arbor Regional

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Detroit

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Beaumont

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Providence Hospital - Southfield

Southfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Duluth

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Biloxi

Biloxi, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

University of Mississippi Medical Center

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Jackson

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Keesler Medical Center - Keesler AFB

Keesler Air Force Base, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Cancer Research for the Ozarks

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St. Louis University Health Sciences Center

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

CCOP - St. Louis-Cape Girardeau

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Montana Cancer Consortium

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Albuquerque

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

MBCCOP - University of New Mexico HSC

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Albany

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Western New York Urology Associates

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

St. Vincents Comprehensive Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Rochester Medical Center

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Southeast Cancer Control Consortium

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Barrett Cancer Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Columbus

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital - Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Dayton

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Dayton

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Oklahoma City

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Portland

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Columbia River Program

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Oregon Cancer Institute

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Charleston

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Greenville

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Upstate Carolina

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Brooke Army Medical Center

Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Medical Branch

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Houston

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Tech University Health Science Center

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - San Antonio (Murphy)

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Temple

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Scott and White Hospital

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Huntsman Cancer Institute

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Salt Lake City

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Eastern Virginia Medical School

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Virginia Mason Research Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Swedish Cancer Institute

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Seattle

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Northwest

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Madigan Army Medical Center

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

British Columbia Cancer Agency

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abrams RA, Winter KA, Regine WF, Safran H, Hoffman JP, Lustig R, Konski AA, Benson AB, Macdonald JS, Rich TA, Willett CG. Failure to adhere to protocol specified radiation therapy guidelines was associated with decreased survival in RTOG 9704--a phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for patients with resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 1;82(2):809-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.039. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21277694 (View on PubMed)

Berger AC, Winter K, Hoffman JP, Regine WF, Abrams RA, Safran H, Freedman GM, Benson AB 3rd, Macdonald J, Willett CG. Five year results of US intergroup/RTOG 9704 with postoperative CA 19-9 </=90 U/mL and comparison to the CONKO-001 trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Nov 1;84(3):e291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.04.035. Epub 2012 Jun 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22682806 (View on PubMed)

Farrell JJ, Bae K, Wong J, Guha C, Dicker AP, Elsaleh H. Cytidine deaminase single-nucleotide polymorphism is predictive of toxicity from gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer: RTOG 9704. Pharmacogenomics J. 2012 Oct;12(5):395-403. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2011.22. Epub 2011 May 31.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21625252 (View on PubMed)

Regine WF, Winter KA, Abrams R, Safran H, Hoffman JP, Konski A, Benson AB, Macdonald JS, Rich TA, Willett CG. Fluorouracil-based chemoradiation with either gemcitabine or fluorouracil chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: 5-year analysis of the U.S. Intergroup/RTOG 9704 phase III trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 May;18(5):1319-26. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1630-6. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21499862 (View on PubMed)

Showalter TN, Winter KA, Berger AC, Regine WF, Abrams RA, Safran H, Hoffman JP, Benson AB, MacDonald JS, Willett CG. The influence of total nodes examined, number of positive nodes, and lymph node ratio on survival after surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer: a secondary analysis of RTOG 9704. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Dec 1;81(5):1328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.1993. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20934270 (View on PubMed)

Tempero MA, Winter KA, Kim GE, et al.: S100A2 as a prognostic marker in patients receiving adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer (PC): A secondary analysis of RTOG 9704. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 29 (Suppl 15): A-4118, 2011.

Reference Type RESULT

Farrell J, Bae K, Guha C, et al.: Correlation of cytidine deaminase single nucleotide polymorphism and toxicity from gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer from RTOG 9704. [Abstract] American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, 15-17 January 2009, San Francisco, CA. A-115, 2009.

Reference Type RESULT

Farrell JJ, Elsaleh H, Garcia M, Lai R, Ammar A, Regine WF, Abrams R, Benson AB, Macdonald J, Cass CE, Dicker AP, Mackey JR. Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 levels predict response to gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2009 Jan;136(1):187-95. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.067. Epub 2008 Oct 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18992248 (View on PubMed)

Piperdi B, Ng S, Piperdi M, et al.: Single institutional experience with oral capecitabine (Cap) in adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: Gemcitabine (G) followed by Cap/RT followed by G. [Abstract] American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, 15-17 January 2009, San Francisco, CA. A-229, 2009.

Reference Type RESULT

Berger AC, Garcia M Jr, Hoffman JP, Regine WF, Abrams RA, Safran H, Konski A, Benson AB 3rd, MacDonald J, Willett CG. Postresection CA 19-9 predicts overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with adjuvant chemoradiation: a prospective validation by RTOG 9704. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 20;26(36):5918-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.6288. Epub 2008 Nov 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19029412 (View on PubMed)

Regine WF, Winter KA, Abrams RA, Safran H, Hoffman JP, Konski A, Benson AB, Macdonald JS, Kudrimoti MR, Fromm ML, Haddock MG, Schaefer P, Willett CG, Rich TA. Fluorouracil vs gemcitabine chemotherapy before and after fluorouracil-based chemoradiation following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 Mar 5;299(9):1019-26. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.9.1019.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18319412 (View on PubMed)

Abrams RA, Winter KA, Regine WF, et al.: Correlation of RTOG 9704 (adjuvant therapy (rx) of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (pan ca)) radiation therapy quality assurance scores (RTQASc) with survival (S). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-4523, 2007.

Reference Type RESULT

Berger AC, Winter K, Hoffman J, et al.: Post-resection CA 19-9 predicts overall survival (OS) in patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiation: a secondary endpoint of RTOG 9704. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-4522, 2007.

Reference Type RESULT

Regine WF, Garcia M, Berger AC, et al.: Post-resectional CA 19-9 values >90 are associated with significantly worse survival in patients with pancreatic carcinoma treated with adjuvant therapy on RTOG 9704: implications for current and future trials. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69 (3 Suppl): A-137, S78, 2007.

Reference Type RESULT

Abrams RA, Winter KA, Regine WF, et al.: RTOG 9704: radiotherapy quality assurance (QA) review and survival. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66 (3 Suppl 1): A-39, S22, 2006.

Reference Type RESULT

Regine WF, Winter KA, Abrams R, et al.: A phase III intergroup trial (RTOG 97-04) of adjuvant pre and post chemoradiation (CRT) 5-FU vs. gemcitabine (G) for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66 (3 Suppl 1): A-42, S23-4, 2006.

Reference Type RESULT

Regine WF, Winter KW, Abrams R, et al.: RTOG 9704 a phase III study of adjuvant pre and post chemoradiation (CRT) 5-FU vs. gemcitabine (G) for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-4007, 180s, 2006.

Reference Type RESULT

Reyngold M, Winter KA, Regine WF, Abrams RA, Safran H, Hoffman JP, Mowat RB, Hayes JP, Kessel IL, DiPetrillo T, Narayan S, Chen Y, Ben-Josef E, Delouya G, Suh JH, Meyer J, Haddock MG, Feldman M, Gaur R, Yost K, Peterson RA, Sherr DL, Moughan J, Crane CH. Marital Status and Overall Survival in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of an Ancillary Analysis of NRG Oncology/RTOG 9704. Oncologist. 2020 Mar;25(3):e477-e483. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0562. Epub 2019 Dec 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32162826 (View on PubMed)

Lawrence YR, Moughan J, Magliocco AM, Klimowicz AC, Regine WF, Mowat RB, DiPetrillo TA, Small W Jr, Simko JP, Golan T, Winter KA, Guha C, Crane CH, Dicker AP. Expression of the DNA repair gene MLH1 correlates with survival in patients who have resected pancreatic cancer and have received adjuvant chemoradiation: NRG Oncology RTOG Study 9704. Cancer. 2018 Feb 1;124(3):491-498. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31058. Epub 2017 Oct 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29053185 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CDR0000066076

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

E-R9704

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SWOG-R9704

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RTOG-9704

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id