Ifosfamide or Doxorubicin in Treating Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma

NCT ID: NCT00003212

Last Updated: 2012-01-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

780 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1998-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether ifosfamide or doxorubicin is more effective for advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of ifosfamide with that of doxorubicin in treating patients who have advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES: I. Determine the progression free survival rate in patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma treated with either of two different regimens of ifosfamide or doxorubicin. II. Assess the toxic effects of these therapies and response rate in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized into one of 3 arms (continuous ifosfamide, ifosfamide daily for 3 days, or doxorubicin). Patients are stratified by performance status (0 vs 1), liver involvement (no vs yes), histological type (leiomyosarcoma vs synovial sarcoma vs other), and histological grade (1 vs 2 vs 3). Arm I: Patients receive doxorubicin by bolus infusion for 5-20 minutes once every 3 weeks. Arm II: Patients receive ifosfamide by intravenous infusion for 4 hours on days 1, 2, and 3 every three weeks. Arm III: Patients receive ifosfamide by intravenous infusion for 72 hours every 3 weeks. Patients are assessed after every 2 courses of therapy. Each course of therapy consists of 3 weeks of treatment. Patients may receive a maximum of 6 courses of therapy in the absence of toxicity and disease progression. Patients are followed every 12 weeks for survival.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 780 patients (260 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sarcoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

ifosfamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically proven advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma including the following: Malignant fibrous histiocytoma Liposarcoma Rhabdomyosarcoma Synovial sarcoma Malignant paraganglioma Fibrosarcoma Leiomyosarcoma Angiosarcoma including haemangiopericytoma Neurogenic sarcoma Unclassified sarcoma Mixed mesodermal tumor of the uterus Measurable disease with evidence of progression in prior 6 weeks No symptomatic or known CNS metastases

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 15 to 65 Performance status: WHO 0-1 Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: WBC at least 3000/mm3 Neutrophil count greater than 2,000/mm3 Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 Hepatic: Bilirubin no greater 1.75 mg/dL Albumin at least 25 g/L Renal: Creatinine clearance greater than 70 mL/min Cardiovascular: No history of uncontrolled cardiovascular disease Other: Fertile women must use effective contraception No other severe medical illness including psychosis No prior primary malignant tumor except: Adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix Basal cell carcinoma

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: No prior chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: No radiotherapy to the sole index lesion Surgery: Not specified
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paul C. Lorigan, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

U.Z. Gasthuisberg

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Aarhus Kommunehospital

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Centre Leon Berard

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Institut Gustave Roussy

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Grosshadern

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

National Institute of Oncology

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Antoni van Leeuwenhoekhuis

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leiden University Medical Center

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

University Medical Center Nijmegen

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam Cancer Institute

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

National Cancer Institute - Bratislava

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Hospital Insular de Gran Canaria

Las Palmas, , Spain

Site Status

St. James's Hospital

Leeds, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Marsden NHS Trust

London, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Middlesex Hospital- Meyerstein Institute

London, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Christie Hospital N.H.S. Trust

Manchester, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcastle General Hospital

Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust

Nottingham, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Weston Park Hospital

Sheffield, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Denmark France Germany Hungary Netherlands Poland Slovakia Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lorigan P, Verweij J, Papai Z, Rodenhuis S, Le Cesne A, Leahy MG, Radford JA, Van Glabbeke MM, Kirkpatrick A, Hogendoorn PC, Blay JY; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Study. Phase III trial of two investigational schedules of ifosfamide compared with standard-dose doxorubicin in advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 20;25(21):3144-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7717.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17634494 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EORTC-62971

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EORTC-62971

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.