Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Hodgkin's Disease

NCT ID: NCT00002561

Last Updated: 2020-04-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

405 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1994-01-25

Study Completion Date

2012-01-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Combining more than one drug or combining chemotherapy with radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of radiation therapy, with or without chemotherapy, with chemotherapy alone in treating patients with stage I or stage IIA Hodgkin's disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the 12-year survival of patients with clinical stage I-IIA Hodgkin's disease treated with radiotherapy with or without doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) versus ABVD only. II. Compare the freedom from progression at 5 and 10 years in patients treated with these regimens. III. Compare the complete remission rate, freedom from secondary disease progression at 5 and 10 years, and cause-specific survival at 5, 10, and 15 years in patients treated with these regimens. IV. Compare the short- and long-term toxicity of these regimens in these patients. V. Compare the quality of life of patients in patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by center. Patients who are under age 40 and have lymphocyte-predominant or nodular sclerosing histology, an erythrocyte sedimentation rate less than 50, and fewer than 4 disease sites (supradiaphragmatic or pelvic node sites) are assigned to cohort 1 (good prognosis). All other patients are assigned to cohort 2 (poor prognosis). Cohort 1: Arm I: Patients with supradiaphragmatic disease undergo radiotherapy to the supradiaphragmatic lymph node areas (mantle region), spleen, and para-aortic lymph nodes 5 days a week for 4 weeks. Patients with pelvic disease undergo radiotherapy to an "inverted-Y" field (excluding the spleen) 5 days a week for 4 weeks. Arm II: Patients receive doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine IV on days 1 and 15 (ABVD). Treatment continues every 4 weeks for a total of 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with complete remission (CR) after course 2 receive 2 additional courses past CR. Patients with partial remission (PR) after course 2 receive 4 additional courses past PR. Patients with unconfirmed/uncertain complete remission (CRu) receive 2-4 additional courses past CRu. Cohort 2: Arm III: Patients receive ABVD as in arm II, followed 4-6 weeks later by concurrent radiotherapy to the mantle region and upper abdomen to the level of L2 5 days a week for 4 weeks. Alternatively, radiotherapy may also be administered sequentially to the mantle region 5 days a week for 4 weeks and then to the upper abdomen to the level of L2 5 days a week for 4 weeks. Arm IV: Patients receive ABVD only as in arm II. Patients with disease progression after treatment in arms II or IV are considered for radiotherapy. Quality of life is assessed on day 1 of each course of chemotherapy (arms II-IV) and on day 28 of the last course of chemotherapy (arms II and IV); on the first and final days of radiotherapy (arms I and III); at 4 weeks and at 3, 6, and 12 months after completion of radiotherapy (arms I and III) or chemotherapy (arms II and IV); and then annually for 2-10 years. Patients are followed at months 3, 6, and 12 and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 450 patients will be accrued for this study within 7.5 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hodgkin Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Radiotherapy or ABVD + Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

bleomycin sulfate

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

10 units/m2

dacarbazine

Intervention Type DRUG

375mg/m2

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

25mg/m2

vinblastine

Intervention Type DRUG

6mg/m2

radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

35Gy in 20 fractions (daily)

ABVD Alone

ABVD Alone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

bleomycin sulfate

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

10 units/m2

dacarbazine

Intervention Type DRUG

375mg/m2

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

25mg/m2

vinblastine

Intervention Type DRUG

6mg/m2

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bleomycin sulfate

10 units/m2

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

dacarbazine

375mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

doxorubicin hydrochloride

25mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

vinblastine

6mg/m2

Intervention Type DRUG

radiation therapy

35Gy in 20 fractions (daily)

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

ii) Bone Disease: Lytic or blastic lesions seen on plain radiographs or abnormalities on bone scan consistent with Hodgkin's disease will be considered as bone involvement with Hodgkin's disease. These patients would therefore be assessed as having Stage IV disease and would be ineligible.

iii) Pleural Effusion and Ascites: The presence of a pleural effusion or ascites will be considered as evidence of Hodgkin's disease even if cytological examination is negative. These patients would be assessed as having probable Stage IV disease and therefore would be ineligible. Patients assessed on Xray as having pleural thickening or "blunting" of the costophrenic angle only may be eligible. iv) Extra-nodal vs. Stage IV Disease: Patients with disease involving a single extra-nodal site may be considered as "limited-stage" provided all disease can be included in a standard radiation field. Patients with extra-nodal disease that cannot be included in such a field (eg, lung, bone) or with multiple sites of extra-nodal disease are not eligible for this trial.

* Pulmonary function tests must be done in patients with symptomatic lung disease. FVC, FEV-1 and DLCO must be ≥ 60% of predicted value. Patients with asthma controlled by medication are eligible if the above criteria are met.
* Patient's age is ≥ 16 years. (Note that the lower age limit at each centre will be determined by that centre's policy regarding the age at which an individual may sign their own consent.)
* Patient must not have received previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
* Laboratory requirements:

granulocytes ≥ 1.5 x 109/L (S.I.) or ≥ 1.5 x 103/uL (U.S.) platelets ≥ 125 x 109/L (S.I.) or ≥ 125 x 103/uL (U.S.) bilirubin ≤ 2.5 x UNL (unless due to hemolytic anemia) serum creatinine ≤ 2 x UNL

* Patient must have been seen by both a radiation oncologist and medical oncologist who agree the patient is able to receive protocol radiation therapy.
* Patient consent must be obtained according to local Institutional and/or University Human Experimentation Committee requirements. It will be the responsibility of the local participating investigators to obtain the necessary local clearance, and to indicate in writing to the NCIC CTG Clinical Trials Coordinator that such clearance has been obtained, before the trial can commence in that centre. Because of differing requirements, a standard consent form for the trial will not be provided but a sample form is given. The patient must sign the consent form prior to randomization. Please note that the consent form for this study must contain a statement which gives permission for the NCICCTG and monitoring agencies to review patient records.
* Availability of patient for follow-up and quality of life (QoL) assessments. Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up. Investigators must assure themselves that patients registered on this trial will be available for complete documentation of the treatment, toxicity and follow-up. Comparison of quality of life is an end-point of this study. Patients must have completed the pre-randomization quality of life assessment and be willing to complete future assessments. The only exceptions will be patients who are unable to read english or french. Patients on study are expected to complete all the quality of life assessments but, should this not prove possible, they will be retained in the study for all other analyses.

Ineligibility Criteria

* Prior or concurrent malignancies, except adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin. (Patients with prior carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix are not eligible.)
* Cardiac disease defined as symptomatic congestive heart failure or coronary artery disease, known valvular (other than asymptomatic mitral valve prolapse) or congenital heart disease (other than asymptomatic atrial septal defects) or need for cardiac medications. Hypertension controlled with drug therapy is not an exclusion criterion.
* Other major medical illness judged likely by the local investigator to preclude safe administration of protocol treatment or required follow-up.
* Patients with stage IA disease (who might be treated with involved-field only irradiation) defined by meeting all of the following criteria:

i) lymphocyte predominant or nodular sclerosing histology ii) disease bulk \< 3 cm iii) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) \< 50 iv) unilateral high - neck only disease, defined as disease located above the upper border of the thyroid cartilage or isolated epitrochlear adenopathy
* Patients with very unfavourable clinical stage I-IIA disease defined as bulky adenopathy. Bulky adenopathy is defined as a palpable nodal mass greater than 10 cm. in diameter or a mediastinal mass with a maximum mass diameter measuring greater than or equal to 1/3 the maximum chest wall diameter (see Appendix III).
* Patients with intra-abdominal disease. (Patients with pelvic disease: ileofemoral, inguinal or parailiac nodes are eligible for this study.)
* Patients with B symptoms.
* Patients known to have a positive antibody test for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or who have a clinical diagnosis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. HIV testing is not a requirement for study entry.
* Patients who have undergone a staging laparotomy.
* Female patients who are pregnant. Note: men and women of childbearing age must be advised in the use of adequate contraception.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

NCIC Clinical Trials Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ralph M. Meyer, MD, FRCPC

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Margaret and Charles Juravinski Cancer Centre

Jane N. Winter, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tom Baker Cancer Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Cross Cancer Institute

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

BCCA - Vancouver Island Cancer Centre

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

The Vitalite Health Network - Dr. Leon Richard

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Regional Health Authority B, Zone 2

Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

QEII Health Sciences Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Health Sciences North

Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Trillium Health Partners - Credit Valley Hospital

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Stronach Regional Health Centre at Southlake

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Lakeridge Health Oshawa

Oshawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Algoma District Cancer Program

Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Humber River Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sinai Health System

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

CIUSSS de l'Est-de-I'lle-de-Montreal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Allan Blair Cancer Centre

Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Saskatoon Cancer Centre

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Instituto del Radio O. Alberti Spedali Civili

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Policlinico Monteluce/Univ. Degli Studi Di Perugia

Perugia, , Italy

Site Status

Royal South Hants Hospital

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada Italy United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Macdonald DA, Ding K, Gospodarowicz MK, Wells WA, Pearcey RG, Connors JM, Winter JN, Horning SJ, Djurfeldt MS, Shepherd LE, Meyer RM. Patterns of disease progression and outcomes in a randomized trial testing ABVD alone for patients with limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2007 Oct;18(10):1680-4. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm287. Epub 2007 Sep 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17846017 (View on PubMed)

Macdonald DA, Gospodarowicz MK, Wells WA, et al.: Relapse patterns and subsequent outcomes of patients treated on the NCIC CTG HD.6 (ECOG JHD06) randomized trial evaluating ABVD alone in patients with limited stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). [Abstract] Blood 106 (11): A-817, 2005.

Reference Type RESULT

Meyer RM, Gospodarowicz MK, Connors JM, Pearcey RG, Bezjak A, Wells WA, Burns BF, Winter JN, Horning SJ, Dar AR, Djurfeldt MS, Ding K, Shepherd LE; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Randomized comparison of ABVD chemotherapy with a strategy that includes radiation therapy in patients with limited-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 20;23(21):4634-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.085. Epub 2005 Apr 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15837968 (View on PubMed)

Meyer R, Gospodarowicz M, Connors J, et al.: A randomized phase III comparison of single - modality ABVD with a strategy that includes radiation therapy in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease: the HD-6 trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial JHD06). [Abstract] Blood 102 (11 Pt 1): A-81, 2003.

Reference Type RESULT

Hay AE, Klimm B, Chen BE, Goergen H, Shepherd LE, Fuchs M, Gospodarowicz MK, Borchmann P, Connors JM, Markova J, Crump M, Lohri A, Winter JN, Dorken B, Pearcey RG, Diehl V, Horning SJ, Eich HT, Engert A, Meyer RM; Conducted by the NCIC Clinical Trials Group (Canada) and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). An individual patient-data comparison of combined modality therapy and ABVD alone for patients with limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec;24(12):3065-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt389. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24121121 (View on PubMed)

Meyer RM, Gospodarowicz MK, Connors JM, Pearcey RG, Wells WA, Winter JN, Horning SJ, Dar AR, Shustik C, Stewart DA, Crump M, Djurfeldt MS, Chen BE, Shepherd LE; NCIC Clinical Trials Group; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. ABVD alone versus radiation-based therapy in limited-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 2;366(5):399-408. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111961. Epub 2011 Dec 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22149921 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAN-NCIC-HD6

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

E-JHD06

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NCI-V94-0427

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000063481

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

HD6

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.