Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Hodgkin's Disease
NCT ID: NCT00002561
Last Updated: 2020-04-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
405 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1994-01-25
2012-01-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of radiation therapy, with or without chemotherapy, with chemotherapy alone in treating patients with stage I or stage IIA Hodgkin's disease.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
RT or No RT Following Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Stage III/IV Hodgkin's Disease
NCT00002462
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Hodgkin's Lymphoma
NCT00003389
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma
NCT00041210
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Hodgkin's Lymphoma
NCT00005584
Radiation Therapy With or Without Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Previously Untreated Stage I or Stage II Hodgkin's Lymphoma
NCT00379041
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by center. Patients who are under age 40 and have lymphocyte-predominant or nodular sclerosing histology, an erythrocyte sedimentation rate less than 50, and fewer than 4 disease sites (supradiaphragmatic or pelvic node sites) are assigned to cohort 1 (good prognosis). All other patients are assigned to cohort 2 (poor prognosis). Cohort 1: Arm I: Patients with supradiaphragmatic disease undergo radiotherapy to the supradiaphragmatic lymph node areas (mantle region), spleen, and para-aortic lymph nodes 5 days a week for 4 weeks. Patients with pelvic disease undergo radiotherapy to an "inverted-Y" field (excluding the spleen) 5 days a week for 4 weeks. Arm II: Patients receive doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine IV on days 1 and 15 (ABVD). Treatment continues every 4 weeks for a total of 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with complete remission (CR) after course 2 receive 2 additional courses past CR. Patients with partial remission (PR) after course 2 receive 4 additional courses past PR. Patients with unconfirmed/uncertain complete remission (CRu) receive 2-4 additional courses past CRu. Cohort 2: Arm III: Patients receive ABVD as in arm II, followed 4-6 weeks later by concurrent radiotherapy to the mantle region and upper abdomen to the level of L2 5 days a week for 4 weeks. Alternatively, radiotherapy may also be administered sequentially to the mantle region 5 days a week for 4 weeks and then to the upper abdomen to the level of L2 5 days a week for 4 weeks. Arm IV: Patients receive ABVD only as in arm II. Patients with disease progression after treatment in arms II or IV are considered for radiotherapy. Quality of life is assessed on day 1 of each course of chemotherapy (arms II-IV) and on day 28 of the last course of chemotherapy (arms II and IV); on the first and final days of radiotherapy (arms I and III); at 4 weeks and at 3, 6, and 12 months after completion of radiotherapy (arms I and III) or chemotherapy (arms II and IV); and then annually for 2-10 years. Patients are followed at months 3, 6, and 12 and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 450 patients will be accrued for this study within 7.5 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Radiotherapy or ABVD + Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy
bleomycin sulfate
10 units/m2
dacarbazine
375mg/m2
doxorubicin hydrochloride
25mg/m2
vinblastine
6mg/m2
radiation therapy
35Gy in 20 fractions (daily)
ABVD Alone
ABVD Alone
bleomycin sulfate
10 units/m2
dacarbazine
375mg/m2
doxorubicin hydrochloride
25mg/m2
vinblastine
6mg/m2
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
bleomycin sulfate
10 units/m2
dacarbazine
375mg/m2
doxorubicin hydrochloride
25mg/m2
vinblastine
6mg/m2
radiation therapy
35Gy in 20 fractions (daily)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
iii) Pleural Effusion and Ascites: The presence of a pleural effusion or ascites will be considered as evidence of Hodgkin's disease even if cytological examination is negative. These patients would be assessed as having probable Stage IV disease and therefore would be ineligible. Patients assessed on Xray as having pleural thickening or "blunting" of the costophrenic angle only may be eligible. iv) Extra-nodal vs. Stage IV Disease: Patients with disease involving a single extra-nodal site may be considered as "limited-stage" provided all disease can be included in a standard radiation field. Patients with extra-nodal disease that cannot be included in such a field (eg, lung, bone) or with multiple sites of extra-nodal disease are not eligible for this trial.
* Pulmonary function tests must be done in patients with symptomatic lung disease. FVC, FEV-1 and DLCO must be ≥ 60% of predicted value. Patients with asthma controlled by medication are eligible if the above criteria are met.
* Patient's age is ≥ 16 years. (Note that the lower age limit at each centre will be determined by that centre's policy regarding the age at which an individual may sign their own consent.)
* Patient must not have received previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
* Laboratory requirements:
granulocytes ≥ 1.5 x 109/L (S.I.) or ≥ 1.5 x 103/uL (U.S.) platelets ≥ 125 x 109/L (S.I.) or ≥ 125 x 103/uL (U.S.) bilirubin ≤ 2.5 x UNL (unless due to hemolytic anemia) serum creatinine ≤ 2 x UNL
* Patient must have been seen by both a radiation oncologist and medical oncologist who agree the patient is able to receive protocol radiation therapy.
* Patient consent must be obtained according to local Institutional and/or University Human Experimentation Committee requirements. It will be the responsibility of the local participating investigators to obtain the necessary local clearance, and to indicate in writing to the NCIC CTG Clinical Trials Coordinator that such clearance has been obtained, before the trial can commence in that centre. Because of differing requirements, a standard consent form for the trial will not be provided but a sample form is given. The patient must sign the consent form prior to randomization. Please note that the consent form for this study must contain a statement which gives permission for the NCICCTG and monitoring agencies to review patient records.
* Availability of patient for follow-up and quality of life (QoL) assessments. Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up. Investigators must assure themselves that patients registered on this trial will be available for complete documentation of the treatment, toxicity and follow-up. Comparison of quality of life is an end-point of this study. Patients must have completed the pre-randomization quality of life assessment and be willing to complete future assessments. The only exceptions will be patients who are unable to read english or french. Patients on study are expected to complete all the quality of life assessments but, should this not prove possible, they will be retained in the study for all other analyses.
Ineligibility Criteria
* Prior or concurrent malignancies, except adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin. (Patients with prior carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix are not eligible.)
* Cardiac disease defined as symptomatic congestive heart failure or coronary artery disease, known valvular (other than asymptomatic mitral valve prolapse) or congenital heart disease (other than asymptomatic atrial septal defects) or need for cardiac medications. Hypertension controlled with drug therapy is not an exclusion criterion.
* Other major medical illness judged likely by the local investigator to preclude safe administration of protocol treatment or required follow-up.
* Patients with stage IA disease (who might be treated with involved-field only irradiation) defined by meeting all of the following criteria:
i) lymphocyte predominant or nodular sclerosing histology ii) disease bulk \< 3 cm iii) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) \< 50 iv) unilateral high - neck only disease, defined as disease located above the upper border of the thyroid cartilage or isolated epitrochlear adenopathy
* Patients with very unfavourable clinical stage I-IIA disease defined as bulky adenopathy. Bulky adenopathy is defined as a palpable nodal mass greater than 10 cm. in diameter or a mediastinal mass with a maximum mass diameter measuring greater than or equal to 1/3 the maximum chest wall diameter (see Appendix III).
* Patients with intra-abdominal disease. (Patients with pelvic disease: ileofemoral, inguinal or parailiac nodes are eligible for this study.)
* Patients with B symptoms.
* Patients known to have a positive antibody test for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or who have a clinical diagnosis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. HIV testing is not a requirement for study entry.
* Patients who have undergone a staging laparotomy.
* Female patients who are pregnant. Note: men and women of childbearing age must be advised in the use of adequate contraception.
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
NETWORK
NCIC Clinical Trials Group
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ralph M. Meyer, MD, FRCPC
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Margaret and Charles Juravinski Cancer Centre
Jane N. Winter, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
BCCA - Vancouver Island Cancer Centre
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
The Vitalite Health Network - Dr. Leon Richard
Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
Regional Health Authority B, Zone 2
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
QEII Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Health Sciences North
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Trillium Health Partners - Credit Valley Hospital
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Stronach Regional Health Centre at Southlake
Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Lakeridge Health Oshawa
Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Algoma District Cancer Program
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada
Humber River Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Sinai Health System
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
CIUSSS de l'Est-de-I'lle-de-Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Allan Blair Cancer Centre
Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Saskatoon Cancer Centre
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Instituto del Radio O. Alberti Spedali Civili
Brescia, , Italy
Policlinico Monteluce/Univ. Degli Studi Di Perugia
Perugia, , Italy
Royal South Hants Hospital
Southampton, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Macdonald DA, Ding K, Gospodarowicz MK, Wells WA, Pearcey RG, Connors JM, Winter JN, Horning SJ, Djurfeldt MS, Shepherd LE, Meyer RM. Patterns of disease progression and outcomes in a randomized trial testing ABVD alone for patients with limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2007 Oct;18(10):1680-4. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm287. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
Macdonald DA, Gospodarowicz MK, Wells WA, et al.: Relapse patterns and subsequent outcomes of patients treated on the NCIC CTG HD.6 (ECOG JHD06) randomized trial evaluating ABVD alone in patients with limited stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). [Abstract] Blood 106 (11): A-817, 2005.
Meyer RM, Gospodarowicz MK, Connors JM, Pearcey RG, Bezjak A, Wells WA, Burns BF, Winter JN, Horning SJ, Dar AR, Djurfeldt MS, Ding K, Shepherd LE; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Randomized comparison of ABVD chemotherapy with a strategy that includes radiation therapy in patients with limited-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 20;23(21):4634-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.085. Epub 2005 Apr 18.
Meyer R, Gospodarowicz M, Connors J, et al.: A randomized phase III comparison of single - modality ABVD with a strategy that includes radiation therapy in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease: the HD-6 trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial JHD06). [Abstract] Blood 102 (11 Pt 1): A-81, 2003.
Hay AE, Klimm B, Chen BE, Goergen H, Shepherd LE, Fuchs M, Gospodarowicz MK, Borchmann P, Connors JM, Markova J, Crump M, Lohri A, Winter JN, Dorken B, Pearcey RG, Diehl V, Horning SJ, Eich HT, Engert A, Meyer RM; Conducted by the NCIC Clinical Trials Group (Canada) and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). An individual patient-data comparison of combined modality therapy and ABVD alone for patients with limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec;24(12):3065-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt389. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
Meyer RM, Gospodarowicz MK, Connors JM, Pearcey RG, Wells WA, Winter JN, Horning SJ, Dar AR, Shustik C, Stewart DA, Crump M, Djurfeldt MS, Chen BE, Shepherd LE; NCIC Clinical Trials Group; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. ABVD alone versus radiation-based therapy in limited-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 2;366(5):399-408. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111961. Epub 2011 Dec 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CAN-NCIC-HD6
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
E-JHD06
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NCI-V94-0427
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000063481
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
HD6
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.